Pain Management and Sociology Implications: The Sociomedical Problem of Pain Clinic Staff Harassment Caused by Chronic Pain Patients

Q2 Medicine
Olumuyiwa Akinwumi Bamgbade, Monisola Temidayo Sonaike, Leili Adineh-Mehr, Daniel Olutosin Bamgbade, Zaina Samir Aloul, Cherith Boatametse Thanke, Thakgalo Thibela, Grace Gaceri Gitonga, Genet Tadesse Yimam, Aria Genaelle Mwizero, Fidelia Batombari Alawa, Lahja Omagano Kamati, Nolubabalo Patience Ralasi, Mwewa Chansa
{"title":"Pain Management and Sociology Implications: The Sociomedical Problem of Pain Clinic Staff Harassment Caused by Chronic Pain Patients","authors":"Olumuyiwa Akinwumi Bamgbade, Monisola Temidayo Sonaike, Leili Adineh-Mehr, Daniel Olutosin Bamgbade, Zaina Samir Aloul, Cherith Boatametse Thanke, Thakgalo Thibela, Grace Gaceri Gitonga, Genet Tadesse Yimam, Aria Genaelle Mwizero, Fidelia Batombari Alawa, Lahja Omagano Kamati, Nolubabalo Patience Ralasi, Mwewa Chansa","doi":"10.5812/aapm-144263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with chronic pain often experience psychological issues. They may also exhibit harassing behaviors toward healthcare staff. This complex sociomedical issue necessitates increased attention. Objectives: This study analyzed incidents of staff harassment caused by chronic pain patients. It examined the characteristics of chronic pain patients who harassed clinic staff, as well as the causative or associated factors. The study also explored the management and outcomes of these harassment incidents. Methods: This prospective observational study involved 1102 chronic pain patients who received treatment at a pain clinic. Data were prospectively collected on patients' gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, injury insurance claims, and incidents of staff harassment caused by patients. Results: Pain clinic staff were harassed by 121 patients (11 %). Among the harassers, females constituted 70.2 % and males 29.8 %. Additionally, 50.4 % of the harassers were unemployed, with unemployed patients causing more staff harassments (P = 0.001). A significant portion, 86 %, of the harassers had injury insurance claims and were associated with a higher incidence of staff harassments (P = 0.002). Patients making disability insurance claims also caused more staff harassments (P = 0.001). Among the harassers, 50.4 % demanded higher drug doses, and 50 % did not have regular primary healthcare providers. The types of harassment included insults (34.7 %), threats (19.8 %), retaliations (3.3 %), and sexual harassment (42.2 %). All cases of sexual harassment were addressed; the patients involved were counseled. Most harassment incidents were resolved through tactful communication. Of the harassers, 9.9 % were discharged from the clinic. Conclusions: Harassment of pain clinic staff by chronic pain patients is significant. This sociomedical issue may be worsening due to factors such as opioid misuse, racism, the pandemic, and socioeconomic challenges. While most chronic pain patients are reasonable, some can be challenging. This study confirmed that the majority of patients who harassed staff were female, unemployed, had made injury insurance claims, and demanded higher drug doses. Abusive patients should receive anxiolytic therapy, behavioral boundaries, counseling, distraction therapy, and empathy. Pain clinics should implement staff training and support programs to protect staff from harassment. Additionally, pain clinicians should establish peer support networks to mitigate the psychological impacts of patient aggression and maintain professional well-being.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"271 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-144263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic pain often experience psychological issues. They may also exhibit harassing behaviors toward healthcare staff. This complex sociomedical issue necessitates increased attention. Objectives: This study analyzed incidents of staff harassment caused by chronic pain patients. It examined the characteristics of chronic pain patients who harassed clinic staff, as well as the causative or associated factors. The study also explored the management and outcomes of these harassment incidents. Methods: This prospective observational study involved 1102 chronic pain patients who received treatment at a pain clinic. Data were prospectively collected on patients' gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, injury insurance claims, and incidents of staff harassment caused by patients. Results: Pain clinic staff were harassed by 121 patients (11 %). Among the harassers, females constituted 70.2 % and males 29.8 %. Additionally, 50.4 % of the harassers were unemployed, with unemployed patients causing more staff harassments (P = 0.001). A significant portion, 86 %, of the harassers had injury insurance claims and were associated with a higher incidence of staff harassments (P = 0.002). Patients making disability insurance claims also caused more staff harassments (P = 0.001). Among the harassers, 50.4 % demanded higher drug doses, and 50 % did not have regular primary healthcare providers. The types of harassment included insults (34.7 %), threats (19.8 %), retaliations (3.3 %), and sexual harassment (42.2 %). All cases of sexual harassment were addressed; the patients involved were counseled. Most harassment incidents were resolved through tactful communication. Of the harassers, 9.9 % were discharged from the clinic. Conclusions: Harassment of pain clinic staff by chronic pain patients is significant. This sociomedical issue may be worsening due to factors such as opioid misuse, racism, the pandemic, and socioeconomic challenges. While most chronic pain patients are reasonable, some can be challenging. This study confirmed that the majority of patients who harassed staff were female, unemployed, had made injury insurance claims, and demanded higher drug doses. Abusive patients should receive anxiolytic therapy, behavioral boundaries, counseling, distraction therapy, and empathy. Pain clinics should implement staff training and support programs to protect staff from harassment. Additionally, pain clinicians should establish peer support networks to mitigate the psychological impacts of patient aggression and maintain professional well-being.
疼痛管理与社会学意义:慢性疼痛患者造成的疼痛诊所员工骚扰的社会医学问题
背景:慢性疼痛患者经常会遇到心理问题。他们还可能对医护人员表现出骚扰行为。这一复杂的社会医学问题需要得到更多关注。研究目的本研究分析了慢性疼痛患者对医护人员的骚扰事件。研究调查了骚扰诊所工作人员的慢性疼痛患者的特征,以及致病因素或相关因素。研究还探讨了这些骚扰事件的处理方法和结果。研究方法这项前瞻性观察研究涉及在疼痛诊所接受治疗的 1102 名慢性疼痛患者。研究人员前瞻性地收集了患者的性别、年龄、种族、职业、工伤保险索赔以及由患者引起的员工骚扰事件的相关数据。结果显示疼痛诊所的工作人员受到 121 名患者(11%)的骚扰。在骚扰者中,女性占 70.2%,男性占 29.8%。此外,50.4%的骚扰者为失业者,失业患者对员工造成的骚扰更多(P = 0.001)。相当一部分骚扰者(86%)有工伤保险索赔,这与较高的员工骚扰发生率有关(P = 0.002)。申请伤残保险的患者也会造成更多的员工骚扰(P = 0.001)。在骚扰者中,50.4%的人要求提高药物剂量,50%的人没有固定的初级医疗保健提供者。骚扰类型包括侮辱(34.7%)、威胁(19.8%)、报复(3.3%)和性骚扰(42.2%)。所有性骚扰案件都得到了处理;涉案病人得到了心理辅导。大多数骚扰事件都通过委婉的沟通得到了解决。在骚扰者中,9.9%的人已离开诊所。结论慢性疼痛患者对疼痛诊所工作人员的骚扰非常严重。由于阿片类药物滥用、种族主义、大流行病和社会经济挑战等因素,这一社会医学问题可能正在恶化。虽然大多数慢性疼痛患者是通情达理的,但也有一些患者可能具有挑战性。这项研究证实,骚扰医务人员的患者大多是女性、失业者、提出过伤害保险索赔,并要求更高的药物剂量。施虐患者应接受抗焦虑治疗、行为约束、心理咨询、转移注意力治疗和换位思考。疼痛诊所应实施员工培训和支持计划,以保护员工免受骚扰。此外,疼痛科临床医生应建立同伴支持网络,以减轻患者侵犯行为对心理造成的影响,并保持职业健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信