Comparison of Recovery Rate and Early Complications Between Primary Resection and Two-stage Operation in the Treatment of Acute Non- Complicated Sigmoid Volvulus

M. R. Alam, Koushik Sikder, Md Ferdoush Rayhan, Mohammad Imrul Hasan Chowdhury, Ashrafur Rahman, Md Tarek Hasan, Shovon Sayeed
{"title":"Comparison of Recovery Rate and Early Complications Between Primary Resection and Two-stage Operation in the Treatment of Acute Non- Complicated Sigmoid Volvulus","authors":"M. R. Alam, Koushik Sikder, Md Ferdoush Rayhan, Mohammad Imrul Hasan Chowdhury, Ashrafur Rahman, Md Tarek Hasan, Shovon Sayeed","doi":"10.3329/jrpmc.v9i1.72722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study compares recovery rates and early complications associated with primary resection and a two-stage operation in treating acute sigmoid volvulus, a gastrointestinal emergency requiring prompt intervention. Proper diagnosis and appropriate operative approaches are crucial for lifesaving treatment. Objectives: This study was aim to compair of recovery rate and early complecations between two operative procedures. Methods: The cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from May to October 2015in National Institute Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh, involved 50 patients with acute non-complicated sigmoid volvulus, randomly divided into two groups, with the outcome variable being the only difference between two groups. Results: Two stage operation patients experienced 24% stomal complications, while one stage operation patients did not experience any late complication. The mean time for one stage operation was longer, and one stage operation resulted in 200 ml blood loss compared to 156 ml in two stage operations. Conclusion: In consideration of anastomotic leakage, operative time, operative blood loss post-operative hospital stay, two stage operation was better than primary resection.\nJ Rang Med Col. March 2024; Vol. 9, No. 1: 59-64","PeriodicalId":370900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","volume":"311 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jrpmc.v9i1.72722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compares recovery rates and early complications associated with primary resection and a two-stage operation in treating acute sigmoid volvulus, a gastrointestinal emergency requiring prompt intervention. Proper diagnosis and appropriate operative approaches are crucial for lifesaving treatment. Objectives: This study was aim to compair of recovery rate and early complecations between two operative procedures. Methods: The cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from May to October 2015in National Institute Cancer Research and Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh, involved 50 patients with acute non-complicated sigmoid volvulus, randomly divided into two groups, with the outcome variable being the only difference between two groups. Results: Two stage operation patients experienced 24% stomal complications, while one stage operation patients did not experience any late complication. The mean time for one stage operation was longer, and one stage operation resulted in 200 ml blood loss compared to 156 ml in two stage operations. Conclusion: In consideration of anastomotic leakage, operative time, operative blood loss post-operative hospital stay, two stage operation was better than primary resection. J Rang Med Col. March 2024; Vol. 9, No. 1: 59-64
原位切除术与两段式手术在治疗急性非并发乙状结肠膀胱术中的治愈率和早期并发症比较
背景:这项研究比较了初级切除术和两阶段手术在治疗急性乙状结肠腹腔积液(一种需要及时干预的胃肠道急症)时的康复率和早期并发症。正确的诊断和适当的手术方法是挽救生命的关键。研究目的本研究旨在比较两种手术方法的痊愈率和早期治愈率。方法这项横断面分析研究于 2015 年 5 月至 10 月在孟加拉国达卡 Mohakhali 的国立癌症研究所和医院进行,共涉及 50 名急性非并发乙状结肠空卷症患者,随机分为两组,结果变量是两组之间的唯一差异。结果显示两期手术患者出现 24% 的口腔并发症,而一期手术患者未出现任何后期并发症。一期手术的平均时间更长,一期手术的失血量为 200 毫升,而二期手术的失血量为 156 毫升。结论从吻合口漏、手术时间、手术失血量、术后住院时间等方面考虑,两期手术优于一期切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信