Future Professionals: Student Satisfaction with the General Medicine Degree Curriculum at University of Prishtina

Q3 Social Sciences
Valbona Beqaj Zhjeqi, Diellza Thaçi, Jehona Luta, Laura Cruz
{"title":"Future Professionals: Student Satisfaction with the General Medicine Degree Curriculum at University of Prishtina","authors":"Valbona Beqaj Zhjeqi, Diellza Thaçi, Jehona Luta, Laura Cruz","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our objective is to assess the level of satisfaction of the students of the Faculty of Medicine majoring in General Medicine, in relation to the curriculum. For this study, a questionnaire with 25 questions with 5-point Likert scale answers was conducted. The face validity of the instrument was established through a focus group and expert review. No identifying information was included in the study, using implied consent. A total of 150 General Medicine students were involved in the research. Students are generally satisfied with the General Medicine program, the presentation, and implementation of the syllabus, criteria, and methods for assessment, engaging students actively, group work, developing theoretical competencies, and assistants supervising clinical practice. Students were less satisfied with the levels of training for workplaces, the inclusion of modern teaching methods, the empowerment of creativity in students, the inclusion of scientific research, and the provision of contemporary and adequate literature.  There were no significant differences in responses based on grade point average, but there were some differences based on gender. The study findings provide student input into important decisions at multiple levels of governance, starting within the faculty but with implications for broader national policy. As a critical indicator of quality, these student satisfaction measures provide administrators with a basis of evidence to conduct quality improvement, including implications for academic staff development, curricular reform, and future educational research studies.   \n  \nReceived: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our objective is to assess the level of satisfaction of the students of the Faculty of Medicine majoring in General Medicine, in relation to the curriculum. For this study, a questionnaire with 25 questions with 5-point Likert scale answers was conducted. The face validity of the instrument was established through a focus group and expert review. No identifying information was included in the study, using implied consent. A total of 150 General Medicine students were involved in the research. Students are generally satisfied with the General Medicine program, the presentation, and implementation of the syllabus, criteria, and methods for assessment, engaging students actively, group work, developing theoretical competencies, and assistants supervising clinical practice. Students were less satisfied with the levels of training for workplaces, the inclusion of modern teaching methods, the empowerment of creativity in students, the inclusion of scientific research, and the provision of contemporary and adequate literature.  There were no significant differences in responses based on grade point average, but there were some differences based on gender. The study findings provide student input into important decisions at multiple levels of governance, starting within the faculty but with implications for broader national policy. As a critical indicator of quality, these student satisfaction measures provide administrators with a basis of evidence to conduct quality improvement, including implications for academic staff development, curricular reform, and future educational research studies.     Received: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
未来的专业人士:学生对普里什蒂纳大学全科医学学位课程的满意度
我们的目的是评估医学院全科医学专业学生对课程的满意程度。在这项研究中,我们使用了一份包含 25 个问题的调查问卷,采用 5 点李克特量表进行回答。通过焦点小组和专家评审,确定了问卷的面效度。通过默示同意的方式,研究中不包含任何身份识别信息。共有 150 名全科医学专业的学生参与了研究。学生普遍对全科医学课程、教学大纲的介绍和实施、评估标准和方法、学生的积极参与、小组工作、理论能力的培养以及助教对临床实践的指导表示满意。学生对工作场所的培训水平、现代教学方法的采用、学生创造力的提高、科学研究的采用以及当代文献的提供等方面的满意度较低。 平均学分绩点没有明显差异,但性别方面存在一些差异。研究结果为多层次管理的重要决策提供了学生的意见,这些决策从院系内部开始,但对更广泛的国家政策具有影响。作为一项重要的质量指标,这些学生满意度测量结果为管理者提供了进行质量改进的证据基础,包括对学术人员发展、课程改革和未来教育研究的影响。 收到:2023年12月7日 / 接受:2024年4月28日 / 发表:2024年5月5日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书