Exploring the human dimensions of harmful algal blooms through a well-being framework to increase resilience in a changing world

Stephanie K. Moore, Maggie Broadwater, Curtis Cha, Q. Dortch, Chris J. Harvey, Karma C. Norman, Justin Pearce, Carrie Pomeroy, J. Samhouri
{"title":"Exploring the human dimensions of harmful algal blooms through a well-being framework to increase resilience in a changing world","authors":"Stephanie K. Moore, Maggie Broadwater, Curtis Cha, Q. Dortch, Chris J. Harvey, Karma C. Norman, Justin Pearce, Carrie Pomeroy, J. Samhouri","doi":"10.1371/journal.pclm.0000411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is expected to alter harmful algal bloom (HAB) dynamics in marine and freshwater systems around the world, with some regions already experiencing significant increases in HAB events. There has been considerable investment of effort to identify, characterize, track, and predict the direction and magnitude of HAB response to climate variability and change. In comparison, far less effort has been devoted to understanding how human communities respond to HABs in a changing world. Harmful algal blooms alter social-ecological interactions and can have negative consequences for human well-being. This is especially true for fishing communities because their resource-based economies operate at the interface of the natural environment and society. Identifying the components of human well-being that are most affected by HABs can advance ecosystem assessment and inform choices about climate-ready management strategies in and across complex systems. This study uses a framework for considering human well-being in management contexts to explore the effects of HABs of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. on US West Coast fishing communities. We find that HABs, and the management strategies to address them, affect almost every domain of human well-being; however, less than half of these effects meet the criteria to be considered by federal disaster response and recovery programs that provide relief to impacted communities. Moreover, much of the data used to measure the effects of HABs that are eligible for consideration by these programs are not consistently collected, which could lead to inequitable access to disaster relief. Our analysis provides a starting point for communities to develop a suite of high-quality indicators of human well-being to evaluate HAB impacts, assess the effectiveness of management actions and the equity of management outcomes, and track adaptation to system dynamics and external pressures.","PeriodicalId":510827,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Climate","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is expected to alter harmful algal bloom (HAB) dynamics in marine and freshwater systems around the world, with some regions already experiencing significant increases in HAB events. There has been considerable investment of effort to identify, characterize, track, and predict the direction and magnitude of HAB response to climate variability and change. In comparison, far less effort has been devoted to understanding how human communities respond to HABs in a changing world. Harmful algal blooms alter social-ecological interactions and can have negative consequences for human well-being. This is especially true for fishing communities because their resource-based economies operate at the interface of the natural environment and society. Identifying the components of human well-being that are most affected by HABs can advance ecosystem assessment and inform choices about climate-ready management strategies in and across complex systems. This study uses a framework for considering human well-being in management contexts to explore the effects of HABs of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. on US West Coast fishing communities. We find that HABs, and the management strategies to address them, affect almost every domain of human well-being; however, less than half of these effects meet the criteria to be considered by federal disaster response and recovery programs that provide relief to impacted communities. Moreover, much of the data used to measure the effects of HABs that are eligible for consideration by these programs are not consistently collected, which could lead to inequitable access to disaster relief. Our analysis provides a starting point for communities to develop a suite of high-quality indicators of human well-being to evaluate HAB impacts, assess the effectiveness of management actions and the equity of management outcomes, and track adaptation to system dynamics and external pressures.
通过福祉框架探索藻类密集孳生为害的人文因素,以提高在不断变化的世界中的复原力
气候变化预计将改变世界各地海洋和淡水系统中有害藻华(HAB)的动态,一些地区的有害藻华事件已经显著增加。人们投入了大量精力来识别、描述、跟踪和预测有害藻华对气候变异和变化的反应方向和程度。相比之下,在了解人类社区如何应对不断变化的世界中的有害藻华方面,投入的精力要少得多。有害藻华改变了社会与生态之间的相互作用,并可能对人类福祉造成负面影响。对渔业社区来说尤其如此,因为它们以资源为基础的经济运行在自然环境和社会的交界处。确定人类福祉中受有害藻华影响最大的部分,可以推进生态系统评估,并为在复杂系统中和跨系统选择气候就绪的管理策略提供信息。本研究使用了一个在管理环境中考虑人类福祉的框架,来探讨伪尼姑状藻类有害藻华对美国西海岸渔业社区的影响。我们发现,HABs 以及应对 HABs 的管理策略几乎影响了人类福祉的每一个领域;然而,这些影响中只有不到一半符合向受影响社区提供救济的联邦灾难响应和恢复计划所考虑的标准。此外,用于衡量有害藻华影响的许多数据都没有得到一致的收集,而这些数据符合这些计划的考虑标准,这可能会导致获得救灾救济的机会不公平。我们的分析为各社区提供了一个起点,以制定一套高质量的人类福祉指标来评估有害藻华的影响、评估管理行动的有效性和管理结果的公平性,并跟踪对系统动态和外部压力的适应情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信