Improving a practical course assignment for mechatronics education

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Juho Alatalo, J. Torvela, Toni Liedes
{"title":"Improving a practical course assignment for mechatronics education","authors":"Juho Alatalo, J. Torvela, Toni Liedes","doi":"10.1177/03064190241253427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hands-on learning is widely recognized as an essential component of mechatronics education. In this article, we describe an implementation of a student work assignment in an advanced course in mechatronics. The article compares the previous free-form project with the new common-form exercise. The purpose is to renew the form, execution, and grading of the assignment, for better control over the learning outcomes and focusing the workload of the teaching staff without needlessly limiting the students’ own exploration of the topic. The evaluation is based on the teachers’ observations and the students’ feedback. In the assignment, the students will design and build a controllable see-saw mechanism powered by ordinary computer cooling fans. Similar experiments are commonly used for teaching in the form of ready-made plans, kits or complete devices. In our version, we wanted to involve the students in the lower level design to better illustrate the effects of mechanical details on the control system. The updated exercise was well received, the students reported clearer understanding of the synergy between the different disciplines of mechatronics, and the teachers were able to provide more comprehensive assistance on questions. Some challenges were identified, including a lack of analytical research by the students when not specifically prompted to do so. In our opinion this renewed approach is flexible enough to accommodate students from various backgrounds and helps the teachers to better adjust the supplied materials according to their students’ particular needs.","PeriodicalId":39952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190241253427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hands-on learning is widely recognized as an essential component of mechatronics education. In this article, we describe an implementation of a student work assignment in an advanced course in mechatronics. The article compares the previous free-form project with the new common-form exercise. The purpose is to renew the form, execution, and grading of the assignment, for better control over the learning outcomes and focusing the workload of the teaching staff without needlessly limiting the students’ own exploration of the topic. The evaluation is based on the teachers’ observations and the students’ feedback. In the assignment, the students will design and build a controllable see-saw mechanism powered by ordinary computer cooling fans. Similar experiments are commonly used for teaching in the form of ready-made plans, kits or complete devices. In our version, we wanted to involve the students in the lower level design to better illustrate the effects of mechanical details on the control system. The updated exercise was well received, the students reported clearer understanding of the synergy between the different disciplines of mechatronics, and the teachers were able to provide more comprehensive assistance on questions. Some challenges were identified, including a lack of analytical research by the students when not specifically prompted to do so. In our opinion this renewed approach is flexible enough to accommodate students from various backgrounds and helps the teachers to better adjust the supplied materials according to their students’ particular needs.
改进机电一体化教育的实践课程作业
实践学习被广泛认为是机电一体化教育的重要组成部分。本文介绍了机电一体化高级课程中学生作业的实施情况。文章比较了以前的自由形式项目和新的通用形式练习。目的是更新作业的形式、执行和评分,以便更好地控制学习成果,集中教学人员的工作量,同时又不无谓地限制学生对课题的自主探索。评价的依据是教师的观察和学生的反馈。在作业中,学生将设计并制作一个以普通电脑散热风扇为动力的可控跷跷板装置。类似的实验通常以现成的图纸、套件或完整装置的形式用于教学。在我们的版本中,我们希望让学生参与底层设计,以更好地说明机械细节对控制系统的影响。更新后的练习广受好评,学生们对机电一体化不同学科之间的协同作用有了更清晰的认识,教师们也能就问题提供更全面的帮助。我们也发现了一些挑战,包括学生在没有特别提示的情况下缺乏分析研究。我们认为,这种更新的方法非常灵活,足以适应来自不同背景的学生,并有助于教师根据学生的特殊需要更好地调整所提供的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education is aimed at teachers and trainers of mechanical engineering students in higher education and focuses on the discussion of the principles and practices of training professional, technical and mechanical engineers and those in related fields. It encourages articles about new experimental methods, and laboratory techniques, and includes book reviews and highlights of recent articles in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信