A Comparative Numerical Study of Effectiveness of Cold Aisle Containment in Data Centers by Varying Rack Porosity Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Q2 Mathematics
Chethana G D, Sadashivegowda
{"title":"A Comparative Numerical Study of Effectiveness of Cold Aisle Containment in Data Centers by Varying Rack Porosity Using Computational Fluid Dynamics","authors":"Chethana G D, Sadashivegowda","doi":"10.37934/cfdl.16.9.94113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depending on specific needs and workloads, several racks with varied component densities may be used in a data center. As server density increases, porosity decreases, and the opposite is also true. A frequently used method called cold aisle containment separates hot air and cold air flows in data center settings to improve cooling effectiveness. In this paper, the performance of a data center is investigated using computational fluid dynamics, and the influence of porosity on cold aisle containment is evaluated using well-established non-dimensional performance parameters. The value of RTI without containment increased with an increase in porosity and a maximum RTI of 217 was found with a porosity of 0.75. Regardless of the rack number and porosity, containment provides the optimal RTI values. The results indicate that the SHI and RHI values for rack 1 for all porosities, without confinement, are outside of the permissible range and at higher porosities containment has no significant effects on SHI and RHI. RCILO values for racks 2, 3, and 4, with or without containment, fall within the 80-85% range, indicating temperatures below 13°C. RCIHI value is 1 for all cases considered indicating no rack is out of the recommended temperature of 25°C.","PeriodicalId":9736,"journal":{"name":"CFD Letters","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CFD Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.16.9.94113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depending on specific needs and workloads, several racks with varied component densities may be used in a data center. As server density increases, porosity decreases, and the opposite is also true. A frequently used method called cold aisle containment separates hot air and cold air flows in data center settings to improve cooling effectiveness. In this paper, the performance of a data center is investigated using computational fluid dynamics, and the influence of porosity on cold aisle containment is evaluated using well-established non-dimensional performance parameters. The value of RTI without containment increased with an increase in porosity and a maximum RTI of 217 was found with a porosity of 0.75. Regardless of the rack number and porosity, containment provides the optimal RTI values. The results indicate that the SHI and RHI values for rack 1 for all porosities, without confinement, are outside of the permissible range and at higher porosities containment has no significant effects on SHI and RHI. RCILO values for racks 2, 3, and 4, with or without containment, fall within the 80-85% range, indicating temperatures below 13°C. RCIHI value is 1 for all cases considered indicating no rack is out of the recommended temperature of 25°C.
利用计算流体力学对通过改变机架孔隙率实现数据中心冷通道隔离的效果进行数值比较研究
根据具体需求和工作负载,一个数据中心可能会使用多个不同组件密度的机架。随着服务器密度的增加,孔隙率会降低,反之亦然。在数据中心环境中,一种常用的方法叫做冷通道隔离,它能将热气流和冷气流分开,从而提高冷却效果。本文使用计算流体动力学对数据中心的性能进行了研究,并使用成熟的非尺寸性能参数评估了多孔性对冷通道封闭的影响。随着孔隙率的增加,无封闭的 RTI 值也随之增加,当孔隙率为 0.75 时,RTI 最大值为 217。无论桨架数和孔隙率如何,密封都能提供最佳的 RTI 值。结果表明,在没有封闭的情况下,所有孔隙率的机架 1 的 SHI 和 RHI 值都超出了允许范围,在孔隙率较高的情况下,封闭对 SHI 和 RHI 没有显著影响。机架 2、3 和 4 的 RCILO 值(无论有无封闭)均在 80-85% 的范围内,表明温度低于 13°C。所有情况下的 RCIHI 值均为 1,表明没有一个机架超出 25°C 的推荐温度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CFD Letters
CFD Letters Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信