Effect of lactic acid bacterial starter KUB-G2 on grass silage quality and its microbial community performed using 140-ton plastic bag silos: a large-scale study

Phatthanaphong Therdtatha, Orawan La-Ongkham, Massalin Nakphaichit, Chaowarit Mapato, Sunthorn Rungruang, Jiro Nakayama, Sunee Nitisinprasert
{"title":"Effect of lactic acid bacterial starter KUB-G2 on grass silage quality and its microbial community performed using 140-ton plastic bag silos: a large-scale study","authors":"Phatthanaphong Therdtatha, Orawan La-Ongkham, Massalin Nakphaichit, Chaowarit Mapato, Sunthorn Rungruang, Jiro Nakayama, Sunee Nitisinprasert","doi":"10.15586/qas.v16isp1.1442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the effectiveness of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) starters in 140 tons of signal grass silage. We compared a locally developed starter, a combination of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KUB-SP1-3 and Pediococcus acidilactici KUB-M6 (KUB-G2) with a commercial starter. We monitored the chemical and microbiological properties of silage at ensiling (day 0) and after 21 days. The results indicated that KUB-G2 produced high-quality silage. There were no significant differences in total viable microbes, lactic acid, or propionic acid contents between the starters. However, the silage produced with KUB-G2 had a lower acetic acid content than that produced with the commercial starter. KUB-G2 also resulted in a narrower microbiome profile dominated by Pediococci whereas the control group displayed a broader range of bacterial taxa with colonization by Lactiplantibacillus and Lentilactobacillus. These findings suggested that KUB-G2, with its distinct microbial profile, is a suitable replacement for imported commercial starters in large-scale signal grass silage production.","PeriodicalId":20738,"journal":{"name":"Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/qas.v16isp1.1442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) starters in 140 tons of signal grass silage. We compared a locally developed starter, a combination of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum KUB-SP1-3 and Pediococcus acidilactici KUB-M6 (KUB-G2) with a commercial starter. We monitored the chemical and microbiological properties of silage at ensiling (day 0) and after 21 days. The results indicated that KUB-G2 produced high-quality silage. There were no significant differences in total viable microbes, lactic acid, or propionic acid contents between the starters. However, the silage produced with KUB-G2 had a lower acetic acid content than that produced with the commercial starter. KUB-G2 also resulted in a narrower microbiome profile dominated by Pediococci whereas the control group displayed a broader range of bacterial taxa with colonization by Lactiplantibacillus and Lentilactobacillus. These findings suggested that KUB-G2, with its distinct microbial profile, is a suitable replacement for imported commercial starters in large-scale signal grass silage production.
乳酸菌启动剂 KUB-G2 对使用 140 吨塑料袋青贮窖青贮草料质量及其微生物群落的影响:一项大规模研究
本研究调查了乳酸菌(LAB)启动剂在 140 吨信号草青贮中的效果。我们将本地开发的启动剂(植物乳杆菌 KUB-SP1-3 和酸性柄球菌 KUB-M6 (KUB-G2)的组合)与商业启动剂进行了比较。我们监测了青贮饲料在贮藏(第 0 天)和 21 天后的化学和微生物特性。结果表明,KUB-G2 生产出了优质青贮饲料。两种发酵剂的微生物总存活率、乳酸或丙酸含量没有明显差异。不过,使用 KUB-G2 生产的青贮的乙酸含量低于使用商业发酵剂生产的青贮。此外,KUB-G2 还导致以犬 杆菌为主的微生物群谱较窄,而对照组的细菌类群范围较广,乳杆菌和扁豆乳杆菌的定植率较高。这些研究结果表明,KUB-G2 具有独特的微生物群谱,适合在大规模信号草青贮生产中替代进口的商业启动剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信