DISKURSUS QIYAS NAHWI PERSPEKTIF IBN MADA DAN ABU ASWAD AD- DU’ALI

Hairuddin Arsyad, Aji Rizqi Ramadhan, A. Sopian
{"title":"DISKURSUS QIYAS NAHWI PERSPEKTIF IBN MADA DAN ABU ASWAD AD- DU’ALI","authors":"Hairuddin Arsyad, Aji Rizqi Ramadhan, A. Sopian","doi":"10.20414/tsaqafah.v23i1.10012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are four nahwu postulates agreed upon by the majority of ulama, namely as-sima', al-ijma', al-qiyas, and istishab al-hal. Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali agreed on four components of Qias, namely al-asal, furu', illat, and law. However, this research aims to identify his contribution to the field of nahwi science and identify the contrasting views that occur between Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali in the use of qias in ulus nahwi. The research method used is qualitative with a literature study as a source of data collection. Data analysis techniques include an in-depth analysis of the contributions of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-dual in the field of Usul Nahwi and a contrast to the use of Qias Nahwi as law. The result of this research is that in the discourse on Qiyas Nahwi, the perspectives of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad al-Du'ali present different but complementary approaches. Ibn Mada emphasized structure and precision in applying Qiyas, while Abu Asad al-Du'ali was more inclined towards context and flexibility in using this method. These two approaches enrich our understanding of how Qiyas can be applied effectively in understanding and applying the law.","PeriodicalId":206355,"journal":{"name":"El-Tsaqafah : Jurnal Jurusan PBA","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El-Tsaqafah : Jurnal Jurusan PBA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v23i1.10012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are four nahwu postulates agreed upon by the majority of ulama, namely as-sima', al-ijma', al-qiyas, and istishab al-hal. Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali agreed on four components of Qias, namely al-asal, furu', illat, and law. However, this research aims to identify his contribution to the field of nahwi science and identify the contrasting views that occur between Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-Du'ali in the use of qias in ulus nahwi. The research method used is qualitative with a literature study as a source of data collection. Data analysis techniques include an in-depth analysis of the contributions of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad Ad-dual in the field of Usul Nahwi and a contrast to the use of Qias Nahwi as law. The result of this research is that in the discourse on Qiyas Nahwi, the perspectives of Ibn Mada and Abu Aswad al-Du'ali present different but complementary approaches. Ibn Mada emphasized structure and precision in applying Qiyas, while Abu Asad al-Du'ali was more inclined towards context and flexibility in using this method. These two approaches enrich our understanding of how Qiyas can be applied effectively in understanding and applying the law.
Discursus qiyas nahwi perspektif ibn mada dan abu aswad ad- du'ali
大多数乌拉玛都认同四种 "真主之说 "的假设,即 as-sima'、al-ijma'、al-qiyas 和 istishab al-hal。伊本-马达和艾布-阿斯瓦德-阿杜阿里同意 Qias 的四个组成部分,即 al-asal、furu'、illat 和 law。然而,本研究旨在确定伊本-马达对纳维科学领域的贡献,并确定伊本-马达和艾布-阿斯瓦德-阿杜阿里在使用乌卢斯-纳维中的 "卡阿斯 "时出现的对立观点。采用的研究方法是定性研究,以文献研究作为数据收集来源。数据分析技术包括深入分析伊本-马达和艾布-阿斯瓦德-阿杜阿利在《乌苏勒-纳赫维》领域的贡献,并与作为法律使用的《基阿斯-纳赫维》进行对比。研究结果表明,伊本-马达和艾布-阿斯瓦德-杜阿利在论述 Qiyas Nahwi 时,提出了不同但互补的观点。伊本-马达在应用 Qiyas 时强调结构和精确性,而艾布-阿斯瓦德-杜阿里在使用这种方法时则更倾向于语境和灵活性。这两种方法丰富了我们对如何有效应用 Qiyas 理解和应用法律的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信