Bacteriological profile and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among clinical suspected adult septicemia admitted patients: A study from tertiary care and teaching hospital

K. Nirmal, Priyanka Gupta, Nadeem Ahmad, Smita Nath, Narendra Pal Singh, Shukla Das
{"title":"Bacteriological profile and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among clinical suspected adult septicemia admitted patients: A study from tertiary care and teaching hospital","authors":"K. Nirmal, Priyanka Gupta, Nadeem Ahmad, Smita Nath, Narendra Pal Singh, Shukla Das","doi":"10.32677/ejms.v9i1.4530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the bacteriological profile and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among clinically suspected adult septicemia admitted patients and to study the correlation between the clinical presentation and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP] and Procalcitonin [PCT]) in the final outcomes of nosocomial sepsis in adult septicemia patients. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study of 1-year duration from November 2022 to November 2023. The study has been approved from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Adult patients with a clinical suspected diagnosis of sepsis were admitted to the medicine ward of the tertiary hospital. Blood samples of adult sepsis suspected patients samples were taken for as a part of septicemia screening. Blood culture and sensitivity were performed according to standard guidelines. The sepsis inflammatory prognostic markers CRP and PCT test were evaluated according to manufactures instruction. Results: Out of 300 clinically suspected adult septicemia patients, 93 (31%) patients were isolated culture-positive sepsis while 207 (69%) patients were culture-negative sepsis. Gram-positive organisms were more (69%) as compared to Gram-negative organisms (31%). Staphylococcus aureus was predominant among Gram-positive organisms while Acinetobacter baumanii complex (9%) followed by Enterobacter spp. (8%) isolated in Gram-negative bacilli. Culture-positive sepsis patients have CRP level ≥3.2 mg/dL (80%) and the majority (80%) of these patients have reactive PCT. Conclusions: Successful treatment of bloodstream infection depends on early diagnosis and appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. Rapid identification results and antimicrobial susceptibility tests are essential for guiding clinicians in the selection of the most appropriate treatment for patients with bloodstream infections.","PeriodicalId":363370,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/ejms.v9i1.4530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine the bacteriological profile and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among clinically suspected adult septicemia admitted patients and to study the correlation between the clinical presentation and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP] and Procalcitonin [PCT]) in the final outcomes of nosocomial sepsis in adult septicemia patients. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study of 1-year duration from November 2022 to November 2023. The study has been approved from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Adult patients with a clinical suspected diagnosis of sepsis were admitted to the medicine ward of the tertiary hospital. Blood samples of adult sepsis suspected patients samples were taken for as a part of septicemia screening. Blood culture and sensitivity were performed according to standard guidelines. The sepsis inflammatory prognostic markers CRP and PCT test were evaluated according to manufactures instruction. Results: Out of 300 clinically suspected adult septicemia patients, 93 (31%) patients were isolated culture-positive sepsis while 207 (69%) patients were culture-negative sepsis. Gram-positive organisms were more (69%) as compared to Gram-negative organisms (31%). Staphylococcus aureus was predominant among Gram-positive organisms while Acinetobacter baumanii complex (9%) followed by Enterobacter spp. (8%) isolated in Gram-negative bacilli. Culture-positive sepsis patients have CRP level ≥3.2 mg/dL (80%) and the majority (80%) of these patients have reactive PCT. Conclusions: Successful treatment of bloodstream infection depends on early diagnosis and appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. Rapid identification results and antimicrobial susceptibility tests are essential for guiding clinicians in the selection of the most appropriate treatment for patients with bloodstream infections.
临床疑似败血症成人患者的细菌学特征及其抗菌药敏感性模式:一项来自三级医疗教学医院的研究
研究目的本研究旨在确定临床疑似成人脓毒血症住院患者的细菌学特征及其抗菌药敏感性模式,并研究临床表现与炎症生物标志物(C反应蛋白[CRP]和降钙素原[PCT])在成人脓毒血症患者院内败血症最终结果中的相关性。材料与方法:这是一项描述性横断面研究,为期 1 年,从 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 11 月。该研究已获得机构伦理委员会的批准。三级医院内科病房收治了临床疑似诊断为败血症的成人患者。作为败血症筛查的一部分,对成人败血症疑似患者抽取血液样本。根据标准指南进行了血液培养和灵敏度检测。脓毒症炎症预后指标 CRP 和 PCT 测试按照制造商的说明进行评估。结果在 300 名临床疑似成人脓毒血症患者中,93 人(31%)为分离培养阳性脓毒血症患者,207 人(69%)为培养阴性脓毒血症患者。与革兰氏阴性菌(31%)相比,革兰氏阳性菌(69%)更多。革兰氏阳性菌中主要是金黄色葡萄球菌,而在革兰氏阴性杆菌中则分离出鲍曼不动杆菌复合体(9%)和肠杆菌属(8%)。培养阳性败血症患者的 CRP 水平≥3.2 毫克/分升(80%),其中大多数(80%)患者有反应性 PCT。结论是血流感染的成功治疗取决于早期诊断和抗菌药物的适当使用。快速鉴定结果和抗菌药物药敏试验对于指导临床医生为血流感染患者选择最合适的治疗方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信