Local procedures for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis: A systematic review of prospective and controlled clinical trials

Gabriela L. Grove, Mattias A. S. Henning, Katrine Togsverd-Bo, Catherine M. DiGiorgio, Mathew M. Avram, Merete Haedersdal
{"title":"Local procedures for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis: A systematic review of prospective and controlled clinical trials","authors":"Gabriela L. Grove,&nbsp;Mattias A. S. Henning,&nbsp;Katrine Togsverd-Bo,&nbsp;Catherine M. DiGiorgio,&nbsp;Mathew M. Avram,&nbsp;Merete Haedersdal","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis are challenging to treat, and neither topical nor systemic drugs have provided optimal treatment outcomes. In the past decades, treatment with botulinum toxin (BTX) has gained status as the gold standard, but it has its limitations both in regard to duration as well as indication for osmidrosis, specifically. A variety of local interventions have been explored in both the surgical field and within energy-based devices (EBDs) for alternative in-office treatments, but a collective overview is lacking. This study sought to investigate and assess the evidence on and effect of current local procedures for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. A systematic search for prospective and controlled clinical trials in the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until 31 December 2023 was executed. Relevant literature was identified independently by two authors according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-nine studies met the criteria for final inclusion, of which 46 studies were randomized controlled trials and 13 were nonrandomized trials. The included studies were classified by procedure type. Individually, a total of 28 studies investigated BTXs, 11 studies explored EBDs, while six studies reported on surgical interventions. Additionally, 14 studies evaluated alternative procedures or investigated combinations and side-by-side comparisons of the different procedure types. The dominant evidence on efficacy and safety was of BTX A. EBDs are increasingly being investigated with microwave thermolysis appearing to be the singular most established and scientifically well-founded method. In the surgical field, less-invasive methods are gaining ground. To meet the increasing demand for individualized treatment, additional high-quality comparative studies are required for the establishment of a future variety of standard treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"3 4","pages":"972-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis are challenging to treat, and neither topical nor systemic drugs have provided optimal treatment outcomes. In the past decades, treatment with botulinum toxin (BTX) has gained status as the gold standard, but it has its limitations both in regard to duration as well as indication for osmidrosis, specifically. A variety of local interventions have been explored in both the surgical field and within energy-based devices (EBDs) for alternative in-office treatments, but a collective overview is lacking. This study sought to investigate and assess the evidence on and effect of current local procedures for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. A systematic search for prospective and controlled clinical trials in the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library until 31 December 2023 was executed. Relevant literature was identified independently by two authors according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-nine studies met the criteria for final inclusion, of which 46 studies were randomized controlled trials and 13 were nonrandomized trials. The included studies were classified by procedure type. Individually, a total of 28 studies investigated BTXs, 11 studies explored EBDs, while six studies reported on surgical interventions. Additionally, 14 studies evaluated alternative procedures or investigated combinations and side-by-side comparisons of the different procedure types. The dominant evidence on efficacy and safety was of BTX A. EBDs are increasingly being investigated with microwave thermolysis appearing to be the singular most established and scientifically well-founded method. In the surgical field, less-invasive methods are gaining ground. To meet the increasing demand for individualized treatment, additional high-quality comparative studies are required for the establishment of a future variety of standard treatments.

Abstract Image

治疗腋窝多汗症和腋臭的局部手术:前瞻性对照临床试验的系统回顾
腋窝多汗症和渗透性多汗症的治疗极具挑战性,无论是局部用药还是全身用药都无法达到最佳治疗效果。在过去的几十年中,肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)已成为治疗的金标准,但它在持续时间和适应症方面都有局限性。在外科领域和用于替代诊室治疗的能量设备(EBDs)中,人们探索了多种局部干预方法,但缺乏一个整体的概述。本研究旨在调查和评估目前治疗腋窝多汗症和腋窝湿疹的局部疗法的证据和效果。研究人员在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等数据库中对截至2023年12月31日的前瞻性对照临床试验进行了系统检索。相关文献由两位作者根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行独立鉴定。59 项研究符合最终纳入标准,其中 46 项为随机对照试验,13 项为非随机试验。纳入的研究按照手术类型进行了分类。其中,共有 28 项研究调查了 BTX,11 项研究探讨了 EBD,6 项研究报告了手术干预。此外,有 14 项研究评估了替代程序或调查了不同程序类型的组合和并排比较。有关疗效和安全性的主要证据是 BTX A。对 EBD 的研究越来越多,其中微波热解似乎是唯一最成熟、最有科学依据的方法。在外科领域,侵入性较低的方法也越来越受到重视。为了满足日益增长的个性化治疗需求,需要进行更多高质量的比较研究,以确定未来的各种标准治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信