Environmental Influences on the Drying Rate of Spray Applied Disinfestants from Horticultural Production Surfaces

Warren E. Copes, Quentin Read, Barbara J. Smith
{"title":"Environmental Influences on the Drying Rate of Spray Applied Disinfestants from Horticultural Production Surfaces","authors":"Warren E. Copes, Quentin Read, Barbara J. Smith","doi":"10.1094/phytofr-03-24-0019-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drying rates of disinfestants commonly applied to horticultural plant production surfaces were evaluated under cool to hot weather and under laboratory conditions to characterize the range of drying times and how this relates to contact times specified on product labels. Drying rates of six disinfestants [isopropyl alcohol (IPA), two quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), two peroxygen compounds (PXs), sodium hypochlorite (bleach)] and water were evaluated when applied to six substrate materials (concrete, galvanized metal, polypropylene ground fabric, polyethylene plastic sheet, pressure-treated pine, and twin-wall clear polycarbonate) based on the weather variables of solar radiation, temperature, and relative humidity. Differences were evident at the point of application. Disinfestants with low (IPA, both QACs and one PX) and high (bleach, one PX and water) surface tension provided approximately 100% and 60% coverage, respectively, when applied to horizontal, non-porous solid materials. Disinfestants applied to horizontal porous materials (concrete, fabric and wood) persisted on the surface for a mean of only 9 to 113 sec because solutions were actively drawn into the substrates internal structure. Disinfestants applied to vertical twin-wall greenhouse material flowed off, while retaining only a maximum beaded wetness coverage of 14%. A Bayesian analysis procedure was used to model drying effects of disinfestants correlated with substrate and weather variables based on posterior marginal and prediction trends. Generally, the fastest drying rate occurred in the first 2.5 min, and approximately 50% of coverage was retained by 5 min. The evaporative process was variable with distinct interactions occurring among the experimental variables.","PeriodicalId":508090,"journal":{"name":"PhytoFrontiers™","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PhytoFrontiers™","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/phytofr-03-24-0019-r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drying rates of disinfestants commonly applied to horticultural plant production surfaces were evaluated under cool to hot weather and under laboratory conditions to characterize the range of drying times and how this relates to contact times specified on product labels. Drying rates of six disinfestants [isopropyl alcohol (IPA), two quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), two peroxygen compounds (PXs), sodium hypochlorite (bleach)] and water were evaluated when applied to six substrate materials (concrete, galvanized metal, polypropylene ground fabric, polyethylene plastic sheet, pressure-treated pine, and twin-wall clear polycarbonate) based on the weather variables of solar radiation, temperature, and relative humidity. Differences were evident at the point of application. Disinfestants with low (IPA, both QACs and one PX) and high (bleach, one PX and water) surface tension provided approximately 100% and 60% coverage, respectively, when applied to horizontal, non-porous solid materials. Disinfestants applied to horizontal porous materials (concrete, fabric and wood) persisted on the surface for a mean of only 9 to 113 sec because solutions were actively drawn into the substrates internal structure. Disinfestants applied to vertical twin-wall greenhouse material flowed off, while retaining only a maximum beaded wetness coverage of 14%. A Bayesian analysis procedure was used to model drying effects of disinfestants correlated with substrate and weather variables based on posterior marginal and prediction trends. Generally, the fastest drying rate occurred in the first 2.5 min, and approximately 50% of coverage was retained by 5 min. The evaporative process was variable with distinct interactions occurring among the experimental variables.
环境对园艺生产表面喷洒消毒剂干燥速度的影响
在凉爽到炎热的天气条件下和实验室条件下,对园艺植物生产表面常用消毒剂的干燥速率进行了评估,以确定干燥时间的范围以及干燥时间与产品标签上规定的接触时间之间的关系。根据太阳辐射、温度和相对湿度等天气变量,评估了六种消毒剂 [异丙醇 (IPA)、两种季铵化合物 (QAC)、两种过氧化合物 (PX)、次氯酸钠(漂白剂)] 和水用于六种基质材料(混凝土、镀锌金属、聚丙烯地面织物、聚乙烯塑料板、经压力处理的松木和双壁透明聚碳酸酯)时的干燥速率。施用时的差异非常明显。表面张力低(IPA、两种 QAC 和一种 PX)和表面张力高(漂白剂、一种 PX 和水)的消毒剂在用于水平无孔固体材料时,覆盖率分别约为 100% 和 60%。施用在水平多孔材料(混凝土、织物和木材)上的消毒剂在表面上的平均停留时间仅为 9 到 113 秒,因为溶液会被主动吸入基材的内部结构。施用在垂直双层温室材料上的消杀剂则会流走,而最大的珠状湿润覆盖率仅为 14%。根据后验边际和预测趋势,使用贝叶斯分析程序建立了与基质和天气变量相关的消毒剂干燥效果模型。一般来说,前 2.5 分钟的干燥速度最快,到 5 分钟时,覆盖率保持在 50%左右。蒸发过程是多变的,实验变量之间存在明显的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信