Role of Retrograde Tibiopedal Access in Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Baker M. Ghoneim, Khaled M. Abdo Elhindawy, Fouad S. Fouad, Mostafa H. Abo Ellil, A. Shaker
{"title":"Role of Retrograde Tibiopedal Access in Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia","authors":"Baker M. Ghoneim, Khaled M. Abdo Elhindawy, Fouad S. Fouad, Mostafa H. Abo Ellil, A. Shaker","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde tibiopedal access as an alternative approach in cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when antegrade access has failed. A prospective study was conducted that included patients with CLI who underwent tibiopedal access after failed antegrade recanalization from January 2018 to June 2022. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcomes evaluated were technical success rate and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, mortality rate, and limb salvage rate (LSR). Forty-eight patients had CLI and Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus infrainguinal lesions. The retrograde approach was used through the anterior tibial artery in 28 patients (58%), the posterior tibial artery in 18 patients (37.5%), and the peroneal artery in 2 patients (4.5%). Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients (43 patients). There was a significant increase in the anklebrachial index after the procedure with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Twenty-two months primary patency rate was 85.2%, while secondary patency rate was 100% and LSR was 96%, respectively. There was no mortality in the series. Retrograde tibiopedal approach is an alternative option for managing peripheral arterial disease and CLI. This method offers another means of crossing lesions when antegrade access failed, and the intervention can be completed either in an antegrade or retrograde approach. As the retrograde approach does not impact access site, considered a feasible safe treatment alternative which increase the success rate of endovascular treatment.","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde tibiopedal access as an alternative approach in cases of critical limb ischemia (CLI) when antegrade access has failed. A prospective study was conducted that included patients with CLI who underwent tibiopedal access after failed antegrade recanalization from January 2018 to June 2022. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcomes evaluated were technical success rate and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, mortality rate, and limb salvage rate (LSR). Forty-eight patients had CLI and Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus infrainguinal lesions. The retrograde approach was used through the anterior tibial artery in 28 patients (58%), the posterior tibial artery in 18 patients (37.5%), and the peroneal artery in 2 patients (4.5%). Technical success was achieved in 90% of patients (43 patients). There was a significant increase in the anklebrachial index after the procedure with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Twenty-two months primary patency rate was 85.2%, while secondary patency rate was 100% and LSR was 96%, respectively. There was no mortality in the series. Retrograde tibiopedal approach is an alternative option for managing peripheral arterial disease and CLI. This method offers another means of crossing lesions when antegrade access failed, and the intervention can be completed either in an antegrade or retrograde approach. As the retrograde approach does not impact access site, considered a feasible safe treatment alternative which increase the success rate of endovascular treatment.
逆行胫骨入路在重症下肢缺血患者肢体救治中的作用
本研究旨在评估逆行胫骨血管入路作为前路入路失败的危重肢体缺血(CLI)病例的替代方法的有效性和安全性。这项前瞻性研究纳入了2018年1月至2022年6月期间前行再通路失败后接受胫骨入路手术的CLI患者。随访时间为 6、12 和 24 个月。评估的主要结果是技术成功率和主要通畅率。次要结果包括并发症发生率、死亡率和肢体挽救率(LSR)。48名患者患有CLI和跨大西洋学会间共识腹股沟病变。28名患者(58%)采用了经胫前动脉逆行入路,18名患者(37.5%)采用了经胫后动脉逆行入路,2名患者(4.5%)采用了经腓动脉逆行入路。90%的患者(43 例)取得了技术成功。术后平均随访 22 个月,踝肱指数明显增加。22 个月的初次通畅率为 85.2%,二次通畅率为 100%,LSR 为 96%。该系列手术无死亡病例。逆行胫骨路径是治疗外周动脉疾病和CLI的另一种选择。当前向入路失败时,这种方法提供了另一种穿越病变的途径,并且可以通过前向或逆行入路完成介入治疗。由于逆行入路不会影响入路部位,因此被认为是一种可行的安全治疗方法,可提高血管内治疗的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信