Anogenital Distance in Male Children with Normal External Genitelia and Those with Undescended Testis: A Comparative Study

Omebe Egwu, EkenzeSebastian Okwuchukwu, Elebute Abiodun, Obasi Aja, Afogu Nwali, Ulebe Obasi, Akpaette Clement
{"title":"Anogenital Distance in Male Children with Normal External Genitelia and Those with Undescended Testis: A Comparative Study","authors":"Omebe Egwu, EkenzeSebastian Okwuchukwu, Elebute Abiodun, Obasi Aja, Afogu Nwali, Ulebe Obasi, Akpaette Clement","doi":"10.11648/j.sf.20240502.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anogenital distance (AGD) is a hormone dependent anatomical landmark that serves as a measure of perineal growth. Previous studies have shown that it is shorter in children with undescended testis (UDT) when compared with those with normal external genitalia (NEG). In sub-Saharan Africa, however, there is paucity of information regarding the relationship between AGD and UDT, hence the need for this study. Objective: To determine whether AGD parameters are shorter in children with UDT when compared to those with normal external genitalia. Method: Three AGD parameters were measured using a digital caliper in 86 children (43 with UDT and 43 with normal external genitalia). These parameters include anoscrotal distance (ASD), anopenal distance 1 (APD1) and anopenal distance 2 (APD2). Data was collected over a 12-month period and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 25 software. Results: Forty-three (43) boys with UDT were matched against the same number of boys with normal external genitalia in our study. There were no statistically significant differences among the two groups in the mean age, height, weight, body-mass index (BMI), gestational age and birth weight. The mean anoscrotal distance (ASD) and ASD index were 39.05±8.14 mm and 2.23±1.17mm/kg for the test group and 44.92±7.81mm and 2.79±1.07mm/kg for the control group respectively. The differences in the mean ASD and the mean ASD index between the test and the control groups were statistically significant with p < 0.05. The mean anopenile distance 1 (APD1) and anopenile distance 2 (APD2) were 77.33±13.09mm and 96.20±8.49mm for the test group and 80.63±10.15 mm and 97.48±12.86mm for the control group respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the APD1 and APD2 between the 2 groups. Conclusion: The study showed that boys with UDT had consistently shorter AGD parameters than those with well descended testis.\n","PeriodicalId":516926,"journal":{"name":"Science Frontiers","volume":" 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240502.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anogenital distance (AGD) is a hormone dependent anatomical landmark that serves as a measure of perineal growth. Previous studies have shown that it is shorter in children with undescended testis (UDT) when compared with those with normal external genitalia (NEG). In sub-Saharan Africa, however, there is paucity of information regarding the relationship between AGD and UDT, hence the need for this study. Objective: To determine whether AGD parameters are shorter in children with UDT when compared to those with normal external genitalia. Method: Three AGD parameters were measured using a digital caliper in 86 children (43 with UDT and 43 with normal external genitalia). These parameters include anoscrotal distance (ASD), anopenal distance 1 (APD1) and anopenal distance 2 (APD2). Data was collected over a 12-month period and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) version 25 software. Results: Forty-three (43) boys with UDT were matched against the same number of boys with normal external genitalia in our study. There were no statistically significant differences among the two groups in the mean age, height, weight, body-mass index (BMI), gestational age and birth weight. The mean anoscrotal distance (ASD) and ASD index were 39.05±8.14 mm and 2.23±1.17mm/kg for the test group and 44.92±7.81mm and 2.79±1.07mm/kg for the control group respectively. The differences in the mean ASD and the mean ASD index between the test and the control groups were statistically significant with p < 0.05. The mean anopenile distance 1 (APD1) and anopenile distance 2 (APD2) were 77.33±13.09mm and 96.20±8.49mm for the test group and 80.63±10.15 mm and 97.48±12.86mm for the control group respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the APD1 and APD2 between the 2 groups. Conclusion: The study showed that boys with UDT had consistently shorter AGD parameters than those with well descended testis.
外生殖器正常与睾丸未降男童的肛门距离:一项比较研究
背景:肛门距离(AGD)是一个依赖于激素的解剖标志,可作为会阴发育的衡量标准。以往的研究表明,与外生殖器正常(NEG)的儿童相比,睾丸未降(UDT)儿童的睾丸距离较短。然而,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,有关 AGD 与 UDT 之间关系的信息却很少,因此有必要进行这项研究。研究目的确定与外生殖器正常的儿童相比,尿道下裂儿童的 AGD 参数是否更短。方法:使用测量仪测量 AGD 的三个参数:使用数字卡尺测量 86 名儿童(43 名 UDT 儿童和 43 名外生殖器正常儿童)的三个 AGD 参数。这些参数包括肛门阴囊距离 (ASD)、肛门外侧距离 1 (APD1) 和肛门外侧距离 2 (APD2)。数据收集为期 12 个月,并使用社会科学统计软件包(IBM SPSS)第 25 版软件进行分析。结果在我们的研究中,43 名患有 UDT 的男孩与相同数量的外生殖器正常男孩进行了配对。两组男童在平均年龄、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)、胎龄和出生体重方面均无统计学差异。试验组的平均阴囊距离(ASD)和ASD指数分别为(39.05±8.14)毫米和(2.23±1.17)毫米/千克,对照组分别为(44.92±7.81)毫米和(2.79±1.07)毫米/千克。试验组和对照组的平均 ASD 和平均 ASD 指数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。试验组平均无张力距离1(APD1)和无张力距离2(APD2)分别为(77.33±13.09)mm和(96.20±8.49)mm,对照组分别为(80.63±10.15)mm和(97.48±12.86)mm。两组间 APD1 和 APD2 的差异无统计学意义。结论研究表明,与睾丸下降良好的男孩相比,睾丸下降过快男孩的 AGD 参数一直较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信