Lexical Similarity in Grid Questions: An Experiment of the Effect of “Same Leading” on Respondent Behaviors

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Chan Zhang, Shuaiying Cao, Minglei Wang, Jiangyan Wang, Lirui He
{"title":"Lexical Similarity in Grid Questions: An Experiment of the Effect of “Same Leading” on Respondent Behaviors","authors":"Chan Zhang, Shuaiying Cao, Minglei Wang, Jiangyan Wang, Lirui He","doi":"10.1177/1525822x241247441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research on grid questions has mostly focused on their comparability with the item-by-item method and the use of shading to help respondents navigate through a grid. This study extends prior work by examining whether lexical similarity among grid items affects how respondents answer the questions in an experiment where we manipulated lexical similarity by adding the same leading phrase to the items in a grid (“same leading” condition). Both interpretative heuristics and survey satisficing theory suggest that such a design could increase non-differentiated answers. Based on an experiment using respondents from a Chinese opt-in panel ( n = 2,000+), we confirmed more non-differentiation in the same leading condition (than the control) for low-education respondents, while the effects were not significant for the others. This study adds to the literature that incidental survey design features can make an impact and highlights the need for more research into the effects of wording styles.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241247441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research on grid questions has mostly focused on their comparability with the item-by-item method and the use of shading to help respondents navigate through a grid. This study extends prior work by examining whether lexical similarity among grid items affects how respondents answer the questions in an experiment where we manipulated lexical similarity by adding the same leading phrase to the items in a grid (“same leading” condition). Both interpretative heuristics and survey satisficing theory suggest that such a design could increase non-differentiated answers. Based on an experiment using respondents from a Chinese opt-in panel ( n = 2,000+), we confirmed more non-differentiation in the same leading condition (than the control) for low-education respondents, while the effects were not significant for the others. This study adds to the literature that incidental survey design features can make an impact and highlights the need for more research into the effects of wording styles.
网格问题中的词汇相似性:相同引导 "对应答者行为的影响实验
之前关于网格问题的研究主要集中在网格问题与逐项法的可比性,以及使用阴影帮助受访者浏览网格。本研究对之前的研究进行了扩展,在一项实验中,我们通过在网格项目中添加相同的引导短语("相同引导 "条件)来操纵词汇的相似性,从而考察了网格项目之间的词汇相似性是否会影响受访者对问题的回答。解释启发法和调查满意度理论都表明,这种设计可能会增加无差异答案。基于一项使用中国选入小组受访者(n = 2,000+ )进行的实验,我们证实在同一引导条件下(比对照组),低学历受访者的无差异程度更高,而对其他受访者的影响并不显著。这项研究补充了偶然的调查设计特征会产生影响的文献,并强调了对措辞风格的影响进行更多研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Methods
Field Methods Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is devoted to articles about the methods used by field wzorkers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for the collection, management, and analysis data about human thought and/or human behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on the reporting of research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. High-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods-- from scientific or interpretative traditions-- dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions are all welcome in the pages of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信