CORRELATIONS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE RISKS AND KNOWLEDGE VULNERABILITIES ALONG KNOWLEDGE PROCESSES

Ștefan Andrei Neştian, Alexandra Luciana Guță, S. Tiță
{"title":"CORRELATIONS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE RISKS AND KNOWLEDGE VULNERABILITIES ALONG KNOWLEDGE PROCESSES","authors":"Ștefan Andrei Neştian, Alexandra Luciana Guță, S. Tiță","doi":"10.24818/imc/2023/02.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is a continuation of a study conducted in 2023 on the subject of knowledge vulnerabilities and risks in knowledge processes, within private companies. The initial study has been presented at an international conference and aimed to put forward measuring scales for the concepts of “knowledge vulnerabilities” and “knowledge risks”, using a new ontology developed by Brătianu et al. (2022) in order to develop an instrument for measuring both knowledge risks and knowledge vulnerabilities. The present study aims to analyze the relationships that we found between the components of a latent variable that we named “types of knowledge vulnerabilities” and the components of another latent variable, namely “types of knowledge risks”. This paper uses the components that were identified for types of knowledge vulnerabilities and for types of knowledge risks in the previous study, based on a sample of 117 valid questionnaires, the respondents being managers and employees (non-managers) from private companies from various fields of activity. The main findings of this study show that vulnerabilities related to knowledge loss and knowledge use present moderate positive and statistically significant correlations with all the knowledge risks components and that vulnerabilities related to emotional and spiritual knowledge dynamics presents a strong positive correlation with the risks with a similar name.","PeriodicalId":296892,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Management Conference","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/imc/2023/02.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is a continuation of a study conducted in 2023 on the subject of knowledge vulnerabilities and risks in knowledge processes, within private companies. The initial study has been presented at an international conference and aimed to put forward measuring scales for the concepts of “knowledge vulnerabilities” and “knowledge risks”, using a new ontology developed by Brătianu et al. (2022) in order to develop an instrument for measuring both knowledge risks and knowledge vulnerabilities. The present study aims to analyze the relationships that we found between the components of a latent variable that we named “types of knowledge vulnerabilities” and the components of another latent variable, namely “types of knowledge risks”. This paper uses the components that were identified for types of knowledge vulnerabilities and for types of knowledge risks in the previous study, based on a sample of 117 valid questionnaires, the respondents being managers and employees (non-managers) from private companies from various fields of activity. The main findings of this study show that vulnerabilities related to knowledge loss and knowledge use present moderate positive and statistically significant correlations with all the knowledge risks components and that vulnerabilities related to emotional and spiritual knowledge dynamics presents a strong positive correlation with the risks with a similar name.
知识流程中知识风险与知识脆弱性之间的相关性
这项研究是 2023 年开展的一项研究的延续,研究主题是私营企业知识流程中的知识脆弱性和风险。最初的研究已在一次国际会议上进行了介绍,目的是利用布勒蒂亚努等人(2022 年)开发的新本体论,为 "知识脆弱性 "和 "知识风险 "这两个概念提出测量量表,以开发一种测量知识风险和知识脆弱性的工具。本研究旨在分析我们发现的 "知识脆弱性类型 "潜变量的组成要素与另一个潜变量(即 "知识风险类型")的组成要素之间的关系。本文使用了前一项研究中为 "知识脆弱性类型 "和 "知识风险类型 "确定的组成部分,以 117 份有效问卷为样本,受访者为来自不同活动领域的私营公司的管理人员和员工(非管理人员)。这项研究的主要结果表明,与知识损失和知识使用有关的脆弱性与所有知识风险组成部分呈中度正相关,且在统计上具有显著意义;与情感和精神知识动态有关的脆弱性与名称相似的风险呈强正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信