Psychometric Properties of Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire: Lithuanian Version

Tadas Vadvilavičius, Donata Burčikaitė, Karolina Jakštaitytė, Tadas Petrulis
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire: Lithuanian Version","authors":"Tadas Vadvilavičius, Donata Burčikaitė, Karolina Jakštaitytė, Tadas Petrulis","doi":"10.15388/psichol.2024.70.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Valid and reliable methods are needed to assess the difficulties young people often face in making career-related decisions. A cross-sectional study was conducted to test the psychometric characteristics (internal consistency, discriminant, convergent and structural validities) of the Lithuanian version of the Career decision-making difficulties questionnaire (Gati et al., 1996) in a sample of Lithuanian students (N = 255). The results revealed that the Lithuanian version of Career decision-making difficulties has good internal consistency. Adequate convergent validity was confirmed by finding statistically significant positive relationships with indecisiveness, and discriminant validity was confirmed by finding statistically significant negative relationships with career self-efficacy. Finally, structural validity was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, which revealed that a 10-factor structure was the most appropriate. The results of the research showed that the Lithuanian version of the Career decision-making difficulties questionnaire is a suitable measurement tool, but further studies on the evaluation of the scale are needed.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"65 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/psichol.2024.70.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Valid and reliable methods are needed to assess the difficulties young people often face in making career-related decisions. A cross-sectional study was conducted to test the psychometric characteristics (internal consistency, discriminant, convergent and structural validities) of the Lithuanian version of the Career decision-making difficulties questionnaire (Gati et al., 1996) in a sample of Lithuanian students (N = 255). The results revealed that the Lithuanian version of Career decision-making difficulties has good internal consistency. Adequate convergent validity was confirmed by finding statistically significant positive relationships with indecisiveness, and discriminant validity was confirmed by finding statistically significant negative relationships with career self-efficacy. Finally, structural validity was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, which revealed that a 10-factor structure was the most appropriate. The results of the research showed that the Lithuanian version of the Career decision-making difficulties questionnaire is a suitable measurement tool, but further studies on the evaluation of the scale are needed.
职业决策困难问卷的心理测量特性:立陶宛版本
需要有效可靠的方法来评估年轻人在做出职业相关决定时经常遇到的困难。我们进行了一项横断面研究,在立陶宛学生样本(N = 255)中测试了立陶宛版职业决策困难问卷(Gati 等人,1996 年)的心理测量特征(内部一致性、判别性、收敛性和结构有效性)。结果显示,立陶宛版职业决策困难问卷具有良好的内部一致性。通过发现职业决策困难与优柔寡断之间存在统计学意义上的显著正相关关系,证实了该问卷具有充分的收敛效度;通过发现职业决策困难与职业自我效能之间存在统计学意义上的显著负相关关系,证实了该问卷具有充分的区分效度。最后,通过确认性因素分析确认了结构效度,该分析表明 10 个因素的结构是最合适的。研究结果表明,立陶宛版职业决策困难问卷是一个合适的测量工具,但还需要对量表进行进一步的评估研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信