INTESTINAL FUNCTIONAL END-TO-END STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS WITH ENDOVASCULAR GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS STAPLERS IN SMALL DOGS AND CATS

{"title":"INTESTINAL FUNCTIONAL END-TO-END STAPLED ANASTOMOSIS WITH ENDOVASCULAR GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS STAPLERS IN SMALL DOGS AND CATS","authors":"","doi":"10.20319/icrlsh.2024.8485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses (FEESA) are reported to have lower complication rates than hand-sewn anastomoses in dogs, however, the size of standard gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) staplers prevents their use in small patients due to the reduced intestinal diameter. Our study investigates the use of endovascular gastrointestinal (endo-GIA) staplers to perform functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis in small dogs (≤ 10 kg) and cats. Methods: Retrospective study approved by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Ethics Review Panel (approval number 2022-144). The medical record databases of five referral hospitals were searched for patients that underwent an intestinal FEESA using an endo-GIA stapler. Dogs with a body weight ≤10 kg and cats were included. Patients were excluded if the available follow-up was less than ten days post-surgery, unless a major complication developed. Outcomes of interest for each patient included diagnosis, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications and survival time. Estimated survival was generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival curves were tested by log-rank test. Results: Twenty-five patients (10 dogs and 15 cats) were enrolled in the study. The mean body weight was 5.18 kg (range 2.6 – 10 kg). Nine patients were diagnosed with neoplasia, 16 with non-neoplastic disease. The median follow-up was 126 days (range 18-896 days). No major complications were recorded. Five patients developed minor postoperative complications that included 3 superficial surgical site infections. Eighteen patients were alive at the end of the study, one was lost at follow-up. Of the 6 patients who died, none were dead because of complications from the intestinal surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was not reached. Survival was significantly longer for patients with non-neoplastic versus neoplastic disease (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of endo-GIA stapling devices is safe and effective to perform functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis in small patients.","PeriodicalId":260489,"journal":{"name":"LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20319/icrlsh.2024.8485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intestinal functional end-to-end stapled anastomoses (FEESA) are reported to have lower complication rates than hand-sewn anastomoses in dogs, however, the size of standard gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) staplers prevents their use in small patients due to the reduced intestinal diameter. Our study investigates the use of endovascular gastrointestinal (endo-GIA) staplers to perform functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis in small dogs (≤ 10 kg) and cats. Methods: Retrospective study approved by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Ethics Review Panel (approval number 2022-144). The medical record databases of five referral hospitals were searched for patients that underwent an intestinal FEESA using an endo-GIA stapler. Dogs with a body weight ≤10 kg and cats were included. Patients were excluded if the available follow-up was less than ten days post-surgery, unless a major complication developed. Outcomes of interest for each patient included diagnosis, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications and survival time. Estimated survival was generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between survival curves were tested by log-rank test. Results: Twenty-five patients (10 dogs and 15 cats) were enrolled in the study. The mean body weight was 5.18 kg (range 2.6 – 10 kg). Nine patients were diagnosed with neoplasia, 16 with non-neoplastic disease. The median follow-up was 126 days (range 18-896 days). No major complications were recorded. Five patients developed minor postoperative complications that included 3 superficial surgical site infections. Eighteen patients were alive at the end of the study, one was lost at follow-up. Of the 6 patients who died, none were dead because of complications from the intestinal surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was not reached. Survival was significantly longer for patients with non-neoplastic versus neoplastic disease (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of endo-GIA stapling devices is safe and effective to perform functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis in small patients.
用血管内胃肠吻合订书机为小型犬猫进行肠道功能性端对端订书吻合术
据报道,在狗身上,肠道功能性端端缝合吻合术(FEESA)的并发症发生率低于手缝吻合术,但由于肠道直径较小,标准胃肠吻合术(GIA)订书机的尺寸使其无法用于小型患者。我们的研究调查了在小型犬(≤ 10 千克)和猫中使用血管内胃肠道(endo-GIA)订书机进行功能性端对端肠道吻合术的情况。方法:英国皇家兽医学院伦理审查小组批准的回顾性研究(批准号 2022-144)。研究人员在五家转诊医院的病历数据库中搜索了使用内GIA订书机进行肠道FEESA手术的患者。其中包括体重≤10 千克的狗和猫。除非出现重大并发症,否则术后随访时间少于十天的患者将被排除在外。每位患者的相关结果包括诊断、术中并发症、术后并发症和存活时间。估计存活时间根据卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)法计算。生存曲线之间的差异通过对数秩检验进行检验。结果25 名患者(10 只狗和 15 只猫)参加了研究。平均体重为 5.18 千克(2.6 - 10 千克不等)。9名患者被确诊为肿瘤,16名患者被确诊为非肿瘤性疾病。随访时间中位数为 126 天(18-896 天不等)。没有重大并发症的记录。五名患者出现了轻微的术后并发症,其中包括 3 例浅表手术部位感染。研究结束时有 18 名患者存活,1 名患者在随访时死亡。在死亡的 6 名患者中,没有人死于肠道手术并发症。Kaplan-Meier估计存活率未达标。非肿瘤性疾病患者的生存期明显长于肿瘤性疾病患者(P = 0.005)。结论:我们的研究表明,使用内GIA订书机装置对小患者进行功能性端对端肠吻合术是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信