A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru
{"title":"A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA","authors":"Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy. \nMethods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points. \nResults: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points. \nConclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy. Methods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points. Results: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points. Conclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.
使用 0.5% 布比卡因和 0.5% 左布比卡因进行头皮阻滞以插入 Mayfield 对血流动力学反应和术后镇痛效果的临床比较研究
研究目的本研究旨在比较 0.5%盐酸布比卡因和 0.5%左布比卡因用于头皮阻滞时的血流动力学反应、疗效以及开颅手术 Mayfield 插入术后的额外镇痛需求。方法:将 60 名接受择期开颅手术的美国麻醉医师协会体能状态Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级患者随机分为两组,B 组(30 人)接受 0.5% 盐酸布比卡因 25 毫升头皮阻滞,L 组(30 人)在插入 Mayfield 前 5 分钟接受 0.5% 左布比卡因 25 毫升头皮阻滞。记录不同时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏、疼痛评分(VAS 评分)、术中和术后额外镇痛剂需求。结果两组患者在所有时间点插入 Mayfield 期间和之后的脉搏率、平均动脉压均保持稳定。结论用于头皮阻滞的布比卡因和左旋布比卡因在减弱插入 Mayfield 期间的血流动力学反应方面效果相同。左旋布比卡因毒性较低,可作为头皮阻滞的安全替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信