A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA
Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru
{"title":"A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA","authors":"Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy. \nMethods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points. \nResults: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points. \nConclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy.
Methods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points.
Results: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points.
Conclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.