The benefits of ‘slow’ development: towards a best practice for sustainable technical infrastructure through the Davy Notebooks Project

S. Blickhan, Eleanor Bird, Andrew Lacey, Alexis Wolf
{"title":"The benefits of ‘slow’ development: towards a best practice for sustainable technical infrastructure through the Davy Notebooks Project","authors":"S. Blickhan, Eleanor Bird, Andrew Lacey, Alexis Wolf","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2024.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we consider technical development and its role in digital humanities research efforts. We critique the concept that ‘novel’ development is crucial for innovation and tie this thinking to the corporatization of higher education. We suggest instead that sustainable technical development practices require a combination of need, creativity and reuse of existing technical infrastructure. First, we present our theory of ‘slow’ development based on this need-driven approach, then demonstrate how this theory can be applied to digital humanities research efforts using the Davy Notebooks Project as a case study. By tracing the history of this multi-phase, public crowdsourcing project and exposing the decision-making process behind its technical development, we demonstrate the promise and possibility of the ‘slow’ method proposed. When read in conjunction with the other essays in this special issue, we hope that this article will demonstrate how digital humanities methods and technical infrastructure can support and sustain traditional modes of scholarship, and the importance of applying the same careful approach to technical development that is applied to research methods more broadly.","PeriodicalId":517034,"journal":{"name":"Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science","volume":"124 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2024.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article we consider technical development and its role in digital humanities research efforts. We critique the concept that ‘novel’ development is crucial for innovation and tie this thinking to the corporatization of higher education. We suggest instead that sustainable technical development practices require a combination of need, creativity and reuse of existing technical infrastructure. First, we present our theory of ‘slow’ development based on this need-driven approach, then demonstrate how this theory can be applied to digital humanities research efforts using the Davy Notebooks Project as a case study. By tracing the history of this multi-phase, public crowdsourcing project and exposing the decision-making process behind its technical development, we demonstrate the promise and possibility of the ‘slow’ method proposed. When read in conjunction with the other essays in this special issue, we hope that this article will demonstrate how digital humanities methods and technical infrastructure can support and sustain traditional modes of scholarship, and the importance of applying the same careful approach to technical development that is applied to research methods more broadly.
缓慢 "发展的益处:通过戴维笔记本项目实现可持续技术基础设施的最佳实践
在本文中,我们探讨了技术开发及其在数字人文研究工作中的作用。我们批判了 "新颖 "开发对于创新至关重要的概念,并将这种思想与高等教育的公司化联系起来。相反,我们认为可持续的技术开发实践需要将需求、创造力和现有技术基础设施的再利用结合起来。首先,我们介绍了基于这种需求驱动方法的 "缓慢 "开发理论,然后以戴维笔记本项目为案例,展示了如何将这一理论应用于数字人文研究工作。通过追溯这个多阶段公共众包项目的历史,揭示其技术开发背后的决策过程,我们展示了所提出的 "慢 "方法的前景和可能性。结合本特刊中的其他文章,我们希望这篇文章能证明数字人文方法和技术基础设施如何支持和维持传统的学术模式,以及在技术开发中采用与更广泛的研究方法相同的谨慎方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书