A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL FOR INTRAOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA: RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

Pavan Kumar Garg, Nand Kishore Joshi, SUNIL CHAUHAN
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLONIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL FOR INTRAOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA: RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, INTERVENTIONAL STUDY","authors":"Pavan Kumar Garg, Nand Kishore Joshi, SUNIL CHAUHAN","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, though advantageous over traditional surgery, presents hemodynamic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum, systemic CO2 absorption, and patient positioning. Clonidine and Fentanyl are evaluated for their effectiveness in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability, considering their different pharmacological actions. \nMethods: This randomized, double-blind interventional study involved 72 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Participants were allocated into two groups, receiving either IV Clonidine or IV Fentanyl. Hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate and blood pressure, were monitored and compared. \nResults: Clonidine demonstrated superior control over heart rate and blood pressure compared to Fentanyl, with statistically significant differences observed in the intraoperative period and post-intubation, indicating enhanced hemodynamic stability. \nConclusion: Clonidine is more effective than Fentanyl in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This suggests a potential preference for Clonidine as a premedicant in such surgical procedures, highlighting the need for tailored anesthetic techniques.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, though advantageous over traditional surgery, presents hemodynamic challenges due to pneumoperitoneum, systemic CO2 absorption, and patient positioning. Clonidine and Fentanyl are evaluated for their effectiveness in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability, considering their different pharmacological actions. Methods: This randomized, double-blind interventional study involved 72 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Participants were allocated into two groups, receiving either IV Clonidine or IV Fentanyl. Hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate and blood pressure, were monitored and compared. Results: Clonidine demonstrated superior control over heart rate and blood pressure compared to Fentanyl, with statistically significant differences observed in the intraoperative period and post-intubation, indicating enhanced hemodynamic stability. Conclusion: Clonidine is more effective than Fentanyl in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This suggests a potential preference for Clonidine as a premedicant in such surgical procedures, highlighting the need for tailored anesthetic techniques.
在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者术中稳定血流动力学的氯尼定与芬太尼的比较研究:随机、双盲、干预性研究
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术虽然比传统手术更有优势,但由于腹腔积气、全身二氧化碳吸收和患者体位等原因,给血流动力学带来了挑战。考虑到氯硝西泮和芬太尼的药理作用不同,我们对这两种药物维持术中血流动力学稳定的效果进行了评估。方法:这项随机双盲干预研究涉及 72 名在全身麻醉下接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。参与者被分为两组,分别接受静脉注射氯硝安定或静脉注射芬太尼。研究人员对包括心率和血压在内的血液动力学参数进行了监测和比较。结果显示与芬太尼相比,氯尼丁对心率和血压的控制更佳,在术中和插管后观察到的差异具有统计学意义,表明血液动力学稳定性增强。结论:对于接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,氯硝安定在维持术中血流动力学稳定方面比芬太尼更有效。这表明在此类外科手术中可能更倾向于使用氯硝安定作为术前镇痛剂,突出了对定制麻醉技术的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信