Aerobic high-intensity interval training and maximal strength training in patients with unspecific musculoskeletal disorders improve V̇O2peak and maximal strength more than moderate training

Håkon Hov, Geir Eithun, Eivind Wang, Jan Helgerud
{"title":"Aerobic high-intensity interval training and maximal strength training in patients with unspecific musculoskeletal disorders improve V̇O2peak and maximal strength more than moderate training","authors":"Håkon Hov,&nbsp;Geir Eithun,&nbsp;Eivind Wang,&nbsp;Jan Helgerud","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving peak oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2peak</sub>) and maximal strength are key objectives of rehabilitation for patients with unspecific musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Although high-intensity training yield superior outcomes for these factors, patients with MSDs may not tolerate high-intensity due to pain and fear. Therefore, we examined the effect and feasibility of incorporating aerobic high-intensity intervals (HIITs) and maximal strength training (MST) in a standard clinical rehabilitation program for patients with unspecific MSDs. 73 patients (45 ± 10 years) with MSDs partaking in a standard, public, and 4-week rehabilitation program were randomized to high-intensity training (HG: 4 × 4 minutes intervals at ∼90% of maximal heart rate; HR<sub>max</sub>, and 4 × 4 repetitions leg press at ∼90% of 1 repetition maximum; 1RM, with maximal intended velocity) or keep todays treatment of low-to moderate-intensity training (MG: various cycling, walking, and/or running activities at ∼70%–80% of HR<sub>max</sub> and 3 × 8 − 10 repetitions leg press at ∼75% of 1RM without maximal intended velocity). HG improved V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> (12 ± 7%) and leg press 1RM (43 ± 34%) more than moderate-intensity group (V̇O<sub>2peak</sub>; 5 ± 6%, 1RM; 19 ± 18%, both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). We observed that no adverse events and no between-group differences in dropout rate or self-reported quality of life (both <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). There were positive correlations between improved V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> and improved physical (<i>p</i> = 0.024) and emotional (0.016) role functioning. We conclude that both high-intensity interval training and MST are feasible and improve V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> and maximal strength more than standard low-to moderate-intensity treatment of patients with unspecific MSDs. Our findings suggest that high-intensity training should be implemented as a part of standard clinical care of this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) and maximal strength are key objectives of rehabilitation for patients with unspecific musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Although high-intensity training yield superior outcomes for these factors, patients with MSDs may not tolerate high-intensity due to pain and fear. Therefore, we examined the effect and feasibility of incorporating aerobic high-intensity intervals (HIITs) and maximal strength training (MST) in a standard clinical rehabilitation program for patients with unspecific MSDs. 73 patients (45 ± 10 years) with MSDs partaking in a standard, public, and 4-week rehabilitation program were randomized to high-intensity training (HG: 4 × 4 minutes intervals at ∼90% of maximal heart rate; HRmax, and 4 × 4 repetitions leg press at ∼90% of 1 repetition maximum; 1RM, with maximal intended velocity) or keep todays treatment of low-to moderate-intensity training (MG: various cycling, walking, and/or running activities at ∼70%–80% of HRmax and 3 × 8 − 10 repetitions leg press at ∼75% of 1RM without maximal intended velocity). HG improved V̇O2peak (12 ± 7%) and leg press 1RM (43 ± 34%) more than moderate-intensity group (V̇O2peak; 5 ± 6%, 1RM; 19 ± 18%, both p < 0.001). We observed that no adverse events and no between-group differences in dropout rate or self-reported quality of life (both p > 0.05). There were positive correlations between improved V̇O2peak and improved physical (p = 0.024) and emotional (0.016) role functioning. We conclude that both high-intensity interval training and MST are feasible and improve V̇O2peak and maximal strength more than standard low-to moderate-intensity treatment of patients with unspecific MSDs. Our findings suggest that high-intensity training should be implemented as a part of standard clinical care of this patient population.

Abstract Image

有氧高强度间歇训练和最大力量训练对非特异性肌肉骨骼疾病患者的有氧高强度间歇训练和最大力量训练比中等强度训练更能提高 VampesO2 峰值和最大力量
提高峰值摄氧量(V.M.O2peak)和最大力量是非特异性肌肉骨骼疾病(MSDs)患者康复的主要目标。虽然高强度训练在这些因素上取得了更好的效果,但 MSD 患者可能会因疼痛和恐惧而无法忍受高强度训练。因此,我们研究了将有氧高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和最大力量训练(MST)纳入针对非特异性 MSD 患者的标准临床康复计划的效果和可行性。73 名参加标准、公共和为期 4 周康复计划的 MSD 患者(45 ± 10 岁)被随机分配到高强度训练(HG:4 × 4 分钟间歇,最大心率∼90%;HRmax;4 × 4 次腿部推举,最大推举次数∼90%;1RM,最大速度)或保持目前的中低强度训练(MG:各种自行车、步行和/或跑步活动,速度为最大心率的 70%至 80%;3 × 8 - 10 次腿部推举,速度为最大 1RM 的 75%,但不达到最大预期速度)。与中等强度组相比,高强度组的峰值脉搏容积(12±7%)和压腿1RM(43±34%)均有提高(峰值脉搏容积;5±6%,1RM;19±18%,均为P 0.05)。峰值脉动值的改善与身体(p = 0.024)和情感(0.016)角色功能的改善呈正相关。我们得出的结论是,高强度间歇训练和 MST 都是可行的,而且与标准的中低强度治疗相比,高强度间歇训练更能改善非特异性 MSD 患者的 V̇O2peak 和最大力量。我们的研究结果表明,高强度训练应作为这类患者的标准临床治疗的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信