Comparative study of wake mean flows with submerged macroroughness elements

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学
Afeef Ahmad, Mohammad Ziaur Rahman, Naima Reggad, Addrita Haque, Abul Basar Mohammad Baki
{"title":"Comparative study of wake mean flows with submerged macroroughness elements","authors":"Afeef Ahmad,&nbsp;Mohammad Ziaur Rahman,&nbsp;Naima Reggad,&nbsp;Addrita Haque,&nbsp;Abul Basar Mohammad Baki","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01354-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large roughness elements (LREs) play a crucial role in river and stream restoration, influencing flow patterns, inducing turbulence and enhancing habitat suitability. Despite their widespread use, uncertainties exist in the literature concerning the spatial variation of three-dimensional (3D) mean flow characteristics. This study attempts to address this gap by conducting a comparative analysis of three simplified LREs—quasi-spherical boulder, artificial vegetation patch, and wooden log—focusing on their effects on downstream mean flow characteristics. The findings of this research reveal notable deviations in streamwise, transverse, and vertical downstream velocity profiles for each LRE compared to reference velocity profiles. These deviations eventually tend to realign with the reference velocity profiles. Each LRE exhibited a distinctive trend for downstream depth-averaged velocity in each direction. The reach averaged shear velocity downstream of the boulder was the highest among the three LREs, followed by the wooden log and then the vegetation patch. The streamwise velocity profiles for each LRE do not adhere to the typical logarithmic velocity distribution of von Karman–Prandtl. Particularly, the wooden log generates the largest wake zone and exhibits a higher streamwise velocity deficit compared to other LREs. Moreover, it demonstrates the highest divergence from reference transverse velocity, resulting in an extended recirculation zone. These observations suggest that the use of wooden logs has the potential to enhance habitat diversity in natural streams and can be effectively integrated into stream restoration projects aimed at improving aquatic ecosystems, thereby contributing to the sustainable management of river environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"72 6","pages":"4559 - 4573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-024-01354-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large roughness elements (LREs) play a crucial role in river and stream restoration, influencing flow patterns, inducing turbulence and enhancing habitat suitability. Despite their widespread use, uncertainties exist in the literature concerning the spatial variation of three-dimensional (3D) mean flow characteristics. This study attempts to address this gap by conducting a comparative analysis of three simplified LREs—quasi-spherical boulder, artificial vegetation patch, and wooden log—focusing on their effects on downstream mean flow characteristics. The findings of this research reveal notable deviations in streamwise, transverse, and vertical downstream velocity profiles for each LRE compared to reference velocity profiles. These deviations eventually tend to realign with the reference velocity profiles. Each LRE exhibited a distinctive trend for downstream depth-averaged velocity in each direction. The reach averaged shear velocity downstream of the boulder was the highest among the three LREs, followed by the wooden log and then the vegetation patch. The streamwise velocity profiles for each LRE do not adhere to the typical logarithmic velocity distribution of von Karman–Prandtl. Particularly, the wooden log generates the largest wake zone and exhibits a higher streamwise velocity deficit compared to other LREs. Moreover, it demonstrates the highest divergence from reference transverse velocity, resulting in an extended recirculation zone. These observations suggest that the use of wooden logs has the potential to enhance habitat diversity in natural streams and can be effectively integrated into stream restoration projects aimed at improving aquatic ecosystems, thereby contributing to the sustainable management of river environments.

Abstract Image

采用浸没式大粗糙度元素的平均尾流比较研究
大型粗糙度元素(LREs)在河流和溪流修复中发挥着至关重要的作用,它能影响水流模式、引起湍流并提高栖息地的适宜性。尽管大型粗糙度元素被广泛使用,但文献中关于三维(3D)平均流特性的空间变化仍存在不确定性。本研究试图通过对三种简化的 LRE(准球形巨石、人工植被斑块和木质原木)进行比较分析,重点研究它们对下游平均水流特征的影响,从而弥补这一空白。研究结果表明,与参考流速剖面图相比,每个 LRE 的流向、横向和垂直下游流速剖面图都存在明显偏差。这些偏差最终趋向于与参考流速剖面重新吻合。每个 LRE 在每个方向上的下游深度平均速度都呈现出独特的趋势。在三个 LRE 中,巨石下游的河段平均剪切速度最高,其次是木质圆木,然后是植被斑块。每个 LRE 的流向速度曲线都不符合 von Karman-Prandtl 的典型对数速度分布。特别是,与其他 LRE 相比,木质圆木产生了最大的唤醒区,并表现出更高的流向速度赤字。此外,它与参考横向速度的偏差最大,导致再循环区扩大。这些观察结果表明,使用木质原木有可能提高自然溪流的生境多样性,并能有效地融入旨在改善水生生态系统的溪流修复项目,从而促进河流环境的可持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信