A STUDY OF AEROBIC BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS WITH THEIR ANTIBIOGRAM IN A TERITARY CARE HOSPITAL

P. V. SUJITHA PRIYA, P. VENKATA RAMANA, A. D. Rani, P. V. PRASANNA KUMAR
{"title":"A STUDY OF AEROBIC BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS WITH THEIR ANTIBIOGRAM IN A TERITARY CARE HOSPITAL","authors":"P. V. SUJITHA PRIYA, P. VENKATA RAMANA, A. D. Rani, P. V. PRASANNA KUMAR","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Surgical site infections [SSI] are regarded as a serious clinical issue and is associated with higher morbidity and death rates. SSIs are defined as infections that develop in the body area where surgery was performed and classified as superficial, deep, and organ-specific. The pathophysiology of SSIs has been linked to both exogenous contamination by medical professionals or contaminated surgical instruments and endogenous contamination by skin flora. The age, obesity, diet, and preoperative hospitalization risk variables were categorized as intrinsic to the SSI. This study undertaken to assess the prevalence of SSI and the microorganisms linked to it and to determine the antibiogram of all isolates \nMethods: A hospital-based prospective study conducted at Government General Hospital, Kakinada during January 2023 to December 2023. Patient information was documented, including the procedure type, kind of wound infection, wound class [clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated], and the total number of days spent in the hospital. Pus sample was collected and subjected to Gram stain, culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing done by standard microbiological procedure. \nResults: A total of 1506 procedures were performed in which 60 cases [3.9%] developed SSI. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated followed by S. aureus, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae and Proteus spp. Maximum ESBL production [25%] seen in E. coli. S. aureus and E. faecalis were Susceptible to Teicoplanin, Linezolid. Gram negative bacteria were susceptible to Amikacin, Piperacillin–Tazobactam. \nConclusion: In the present study, the rate of infection is 3.9%. The common isolate was E. coli and there is an emerging drug resistance. To prevent SSIs i would suggest that frequent surveillance, appropriate pre and postsurgical management, rigorous adherence to hospital infection control protocols, and prevention of bacterial drug resistance are crucial.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Surgical site infections [SSI] are regarded as a serious clinical issue and is associated with higher morbidity and death rates. SSIs are defined as infections that develop in the body area where surgery was performed and classified as superficial, deep, and organ-specific. The pathophysiology of SSIs has been linked to both exogenous contamination by medical professionals or contaminated surgical instruments and endogenous contamination by skin flora. The age, obesity, diet, and preoperative hospitalization risk variables were categorized as intrinsic to the SSI. This study undertaken to assess the prevalence of SSI and the microorganisms linked to it and to determine the antibiogram of all isolates Methods: A hospital-based prospective study conducted at Government General Hospital, Kakinada during January 2023 to December 2023. Patient information was documented, including the procedure type, kind of wound infection, wound class [clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated], and the total number of days spent in the hospital. Pus sample was collected and subjected to Gram stain, culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing done by standard microbiological procedure. Results: A total of 1506 procedures were performed in which 60 cases [3.9%] developed SSI. Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated followed by S. aureus, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae and Proteus spp. Maximum ESBL production [25%] seen in E. coli. S. aureus and E. faecalis were Susceptible to Teicoplanin, Linezolid. Gram negative bacteria were susceptible to Amikacin, Piperacillin–Tazobactam. Conclusion: In the present study, the rate of infection is 3.9%. The common isolate was E. coli and there is an emerging drug resistance. To prevent SSIs i would suggest that frequent surveillance, appropriate pre and postsurgical management, rigorous adherence to hospital infection control protocols, and prevention of bacterial drug resistance are crucial.
一家三级护理医院对手术部位感染需氧细菌学特征及其抗生素图谱的研究
目的:手术部位感染(SSI)被认为是一个严重的临床问题,与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。SSI 被定义为在进行手术的身体部位发生的感染,分为浅表、深部和器官特异性感染。SSI 的病理生理学与医务人员或受污染手术器械的外源性污染和皮肤菌群的内源性污染有关。年龄、肥胖、饮食和术前住院风险变量被归类为 SSI 的内在因素。本研究旨在评估 SSI 的发病率及其相关微生物,并确定所有分离菌株的抗生素谱:2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,在卡基纳达政府综合医院开展了一项基于医院的前瞻性研究。记录患者信息,包括手术类型、伤口感染类型、伤口等级(清洁、清洁-污染和污染)以及住院总天数。采集脓液样本,并按照标准微生物学程序进行革兰氏染色、培养和抗生素敏感性检测。结果共进行了 1506 例手术,其中 60 例(3.9%)出现 SSI。大肠杆菌是最常见的分离菌,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌、粪大肠杆菌、肺炎双球菌和变形杆菌。金黄色葡萄球菌和粪大肠杆菌对替考拉宁、利奈唑胺敏感。革兰氏阴性菌对阿米卡星、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦敏感。结论在本研究中,感染率为 3.9%。常见的分离菌是大肠杆菌,并且出现了耐药性。为了预防 SSI,我建议必须经常进行监测、进行适当的术前术后管理、严格遵守医院感染控制规程以及预防细菌耐药性的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信