Reasons for encounters, diagnoses, and admission rate among emergency referrals at an urban primary care clinic in Japan: A retrospective cohort study

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yoshinao Satoi MD, Masato Matsushima MD, MPH, PhD, Hiroyoshi Iwata MD, PhD
{"title":"Reasons for encounters, diagnoses, and admission rate among emergency referrals at an urban primary care clinic in Japan: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yoshinao Satoi MD,&nbsp;Masato Matsushima MD, MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Iwata MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jgf2.704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Comprehensive understanding of emergency referrals (EmR), encompassing reasons for encounters (RFEs) and diagnoses, is crucial for primary care physicians (PCPs). Comparing EmR rates and subsequent admission rates can potentially enhance the quality of primary care for EmR practice. However, no study has evaluated RFEs among patients with EmRs. This study aimed to identify RFE/diagnosis in relation to subsequent admission among patients receiving EmR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an urban family physician teaching clinic in Kawasaki City, Japan. Our cohort recruited consecutive EmR episodes with their medical records and admissions confirmed through response letters from receiving hospitals. Using the 2nd edition of the International Classification of Primary Care, we explored the frequency of RFEs and diagnoses, calculating EmR rates and admission rates as primary outcomes. Bivariate analyses were employed to compare admission and non-admission cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The present study encompassed 162 EmR episodes out of 47,901 visits, yielding an EmR rate of 3.38/1000 visits. Among 153 completely followed episodes, 99 patients were emergently admitted, resulting in a 64.7% admission rate. The admission group exhibited significantly higher age and a greater prevalence of dementia. Descriptive analysis revealed fever and pneumonia as the most frequent RFE and diagnosis, respectively, with significant differences between admission and non-admission groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present study reports EmR and admission rates following EmR, highlighting differences in patient characteristics, RFEs, and diagnoses. The findings offer insights to enhance PCPs' EmR practices and serve as a benchmark for the scope of EmR practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgf2.704","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgf2.704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Comprehensive understanding of emergency referrals (EmR), encompassing reasons for encounters (RFEs) and diagnoses, is crucial for primary care physicians (PCPs). Comparing EmR rates and subsequent admission rates can potentially enhance the quality of primary care for EmR practice. However, no study has evaluated RFEs among patients with EmRs. This study aimed to identify RFE/diagnosis in relation to subsequent admission among patients receiving EmR.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an urban family physician teaching clinic in Kawasaki City, Japan. Our cohort recruited consecutive EmR episodes with their medical records and admissions confirmed through response letters from receiving hospitals. Using the 2nd edition of the International Classification of Primary Care, we explored the frequency of RFEs and diagnoses, calculating EmR rates and admission rates as primary outcomes. Bivariate analyses were employed to compare admission and non-admission cases.

Results

The present study encompassed 162 EmR episodes out of 47,901 visits, yielding an EmR rate of 3.38/1000 visits. Among 153 completely followed episodes, 99 patients were emergently admitted, resulting in a 64.7% admission rate. The admission group exhibited significantly higher age and a greater prevalence of dementia. Descriptive analysis revealed fever and pneumonia as the most frequent RFE and diagnosis, respectively, with significant differences between admission and non-admission groups.

Conclusions

The present study reports EmR and admission rates following EmR, highlighting differences in patient characteristics, RFEs, and diagnoses. The findings offer insights to enhance PCPs' EmR practices and serve as a benchmark for the scope of EmR practice.

Abstract Image

日本城市初级保健诊所急诊转诊患者的就诊原因、诊断和入院率:回顾性队列研究
全面了解急诊转诊(EmR),包括就诊原因(RFE)和诊断,对初级保健医生(PCP)至关重要。比较急诊转诊率和后续入院率有可能提高急诊转诊实践的初级保健质量。然而,还没有研究对 EmR 患者的 RFE 进行过评估。我们在日本川崎市的一家城市家庭医生教学诊所开展了一项回顾性队列研究。我们在川崎市的城市家庭医生教学诊所进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们的队列招募了连续接受 EmR 的患者,他们的医疗记录和入院情况均通过接收医院的回信得到确认。我们使用第二版《国际初级保健分类》(International Classification of Primary Care)探讨了RFE的频率和诊断,并将EMR率和入院率作为主要结果进行计算。本研究从 47,901 次就诊中收集了 162 次 EmR,EmR 率为 3.38/1000。在 153 个完全跟踪的病例中,有 99 名患者急诊入院,入院率为 64.7%。入院组患者的年龄明显偏高,痴呆症的发病率也更高。描述性分析显示,发热和肺炎分别是最常见的急诊病例和诊断,入院组和非入院组之间存在显著差异。本研究报告了急诊病例和急诊病例后的入院率,强调了患者特征、急诊病例和诊断的差异。本研究报告了 EmR 后的 EmR 和入院率,强调了患者特征、RFE 和诊断的差异。研究结果为加强初级保健医生的 EmR 实践提供了启示,并可作为 EmR 实践范围的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General and Family Medicine
Journal of General and Family Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
79
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信