Success rate and predictors of return to work after implementation of a formal return-to-work trajectory: A retrospective cohort study.

Work Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.3233/WOR-230412
Isabelle Boets, Steven Luyten, S. Vandenbroeck, L. Godderis
{"title":"Success rate and predictors of return to work after implementation of a formal return-to-work trajectory: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Isabelle Boets, Steven Luyten, S. Vandenbroeck, L. Godderis","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nLong term sick leave (SL) is increasing in Europe, several countries have legislative initiatives to reduce long-term absenteeism.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nWe evaluated the impact of a legally defined return-to-work (RTW) trajectory on the RTW of employees on sick leave in Belgium.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis was a retrospective register-based cohort study of employees (n = 1416) who followed an RTW trajectory in 2017. We linked workers' data from a prevention service with social security data. By multinomial logistic regression, we analysed which characteristics predicted the RTW with the same or another employer.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOne year after their RTW trajectory, 69.2% of the 1416 employees did not RTW; 10.7% returned to work with the same employer and 20.1% with a new employer. Duration of SL was an important predictor for the RTW with both the same employer and another employer. The odds of RTW were lower when the SL duration was >  6 months compared to <  6 months. Marital status, organization-size, and the occupational physician decision had a significant impact on the RTW with the same employer. Age and who initiated the RTW-trajectory were important predictors on the RTW with another employer.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOverall, 30.8% of employees returned to work after their RTW trajectory. A one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended. A stepped approach with an early, informal start of the RTW process is advised. When employees or employers fail to initiate the RTW on their own, a legally defined RTW trajectory could be useful. In particular, RTW with another employer seemed a positive effect of the RTW-trajectory.","PeriodicalId":506534,"journal":{"name":"Work","volume":"26 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Long term sick leave (SL) is increasing in Europe, several countries have legislative initiatives to reduce long-term absenteeism. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the impact of a legally defined return-to-work (RTW) trajectory on the RTW of employees on sick leave in Belgium. METHODS This was a retrospective register-based cohort study of employees (n = 1416) who followed an RTW trajectory in 2017. We linked workers' data from a prevention service with social security data. By multinomial logistic regression, we analysed which characteristics predicted the RTW with the same or another employer. RESULTS One year after their RTW trajectory, 69.2% of the 1416 employees did not RTW; 10.7% returned to work with the same employer and 20.1% with a new employer. Duration of SL was an important predictor for the RTW with both the same employer and another employer. The odds of RTW were lower when the SL duration was >  6 months compared to <  6 months. Marital status, organization-size, and the occupational physician decision had a significant impact on the RTW with the same employer. Age and who initiated the RTW-trajectory were important predictors on the RTW with another employer. CONCLUSIONS Overall, 30.8% of employees returned to work after their RTW trajectory. A one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended. A stepped approach with an early, informal start of the RTW process is advised. When employees or employers fail to initiate the RTW on their own, a legally defined RTW trajectory could be useful. In particular, RTW with another employer seemed a positive effect of the RTW-trajectory.
实施正式重返工作岗位轨迹后重返工作岗位的成功率和预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景长期病假(SL)在欧洲日益增多,一些国家已采取立法措施减少长期缺勤现象。目的我们评估了法律规定的重返工作岗位(RTW)轨迹对比利时病假员工重返工作岗位的影响。方法这是一项基于登记簿的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2017 年遵循 RTW 轨迹的员工(n = 1416)。我们将预防服务机构提供的工人数据与社会保障数据联系起来。通过多项式逻辑回归,我们分析了哪些特征可以预测在同一雇主或另一雇主处的复工情况。结果 在复工轨迹出现一年后,1416 名雇员中有 69.2% 没有复工;10.7% 在同一雇主处复工,20.1% 在新雇主处复工。在同一个雇主和另一个雇主工作的复工率中,持续工作时间是一个重要的预测因素。与小于 6 个月的持续时间相比,当持续时间大于 6 个月时,复工几率较低。婚姻状况、组织规模和职业医生的决定对与同一雇主的复工有显著影响。结论总体而言,30.8%的员工在完成复工后重返工作岗位。不建议采用一刀切的方法。建议采取阶梯式方法,尽早非正式地启动复工流程。当雇员或雇主无法自行启动复工时,法律规定的复工轨迹可能会有所帮助。特别是,与另一名雇主一起进行复工似乎是复工轨迹的一个积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信