Thermodynamic analysis of temperature boosting of hot primary air in an ultra‐supercritical lignite‐fired power plant: Scheme comparison and performance enhancement

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 Chemical Engineering
Shaocheng Pan, Maoliang Li, Weicheng Li, Xiaolong Lin, Yinhe Liu
{"title":"Thermodynamic analysis of temperature boosting of hot primary air in an ultra‐supercritical lignite‐fired power plant: Scheme comparison and performance enhancement","authors":"Shaocheng Pan, Maoliang Li, Weicheng Li, Xiaolong Lin, Yinhe Liu","doi":"10.1002/apj.3093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lignite‐fired boilers usually encounter the insufficient drying capacity of the pulverizer due to the inherent drawback of high moisture content in fuel. In this study, four schemes of heat sources for temperature boosting of hot primary air are proposed for an ultra‐supercritical large‐scale single reheat lignite‐fired power plant according to heat sources such as inlet flue gas of air preheater (Scheme 1), the third stage extraction steam (Scheme 2), outlet steam of low‐temperature reheater (Scheme 3), and inlet flue gas of economizer (Scheme 4). The thermodynamic system models are built by using EBSILON Professional software. The thermodynamic performance of the four schemes is analyzed and compared from the perspectives of the first and second laws of thermodynamics. First law analysis indicates that the power generation standard coal consumption of Scheme 3 is reduced by 0.87, 0.42, and 0.04 g·kW−1·h−1 compared with Schemes 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Second law analysis indicates that the exergy loss of Schemes 2–4 is 3.7, 7.6, and 7.5 MW lower than that of Scheme 1. The present study may provide guidance for the energy efficiency improvement of lignite‐fired power plants.","PeriodicalId":8852,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.3093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lignite‐fired boilers usually encounter the insufficient drying capacity of the pulverizer due to the inherent drawback of high moisture content in fuel. In this study, four schemes of heat sources for temperature boosting of hot primary air are proposed for an ultra‐supercritical large‐scale single reheat lignite‐fired power plant according to heat sources such as inlet flue gas of air preheater (Scheme 1), the third stage extraction steam (Scheme 2), outlet steam of low‐temperature reheater (Scheme 3), and inlet flue gas of economizer (Scheme 4). The thermodynamic system models are built by using EBSILON Professional software. The thermodynamic performance of the four schemes is analyzed and compared from the perspectives of the first and second laws of thermodynamics. First law analysis indicates that the power generation standard coal consumption of Scheme 3 is reduced by 0.87, 0.42, and 0.04 g·kW−1·h−1 compared with Schemes 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Second law analysis indicates that the exergy loss of Schemes 2–4 is 3.7, 7.6, and 7.5 MW lower than that of Scheme 1. The present study may provide guidance for the energy efficiency improvement of lignite‐fired power plants.
超超临界褐煤燃烧发电厂热一次风升温的热力学分析:方案比较与性能提升
由于燃料含水量高的固有缺点,褐煤燃烧锅炉通常会遇到粉碎机干燥能力不足的问题。本研究根据空气预热器入口烟气(方案 1)、第三阶段抽汽(方案 2)、低温再热器出口蒸汽(方案 3)和省煤器入口烟气(方案 4)等热源,为超超临界大型单再热褐煤燃烧电厂提出了四种热一次风升温热源方案。热力学系统模型由 EBSILON Professional 软件建立。从热力学第一和第二定律的角度对四种方案的热力学性能进行了分析和比较。第一定律分析表明,与方案 1、2 和 4 相比,方案 3 的发电标准煤耗分别降低了 0.87、0.42 和 0.04 g-kW-1-h-1。第二定律分析表明,方案 2-4 的放能损失比方案 1 低 3.7、7.6 和 7.5 兆瓦。本研究可为提高褐煤燃烧发电厂的能效提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering
Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
111
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering is aimed at capturing current developments and initiatives in chemical engineering related and specialised areas. Publishing six issues each year, the journal showcases innovative technological developments, providing an opportunity for technology transfer and collaboration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering will focus particular attention on the key areas of: Process Application (separation, polymer, catalysis, nanotechnology, electrochemistry, nuclear technology); Energy and Environmental Technology (materials for energy storage and conversion, coal gasification, gas liquefaction, air pollution control, water treatment, waste utilization and management, nuclear waste remediation); and Biochemical Engineering (including targeted drug delivery applications).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信