A Clinical Focus on Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice When Providing Dysarthria and Dysphagia Services to Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Cara Donohue, Bridget Perry, Kendrea L. (Focht) Garand
{"title":"A Clinical Focus on Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice When Providing Dysarthria and Dysphagia Services to Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis","authors":"Cara Donohue, Bridget Perry, Kendrea L. (Focht) Garand","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Traditional health care decision-making models center on clinicians making decisions for patients/caregivers based on the best available research evidence. However, this diminishes patient/caregiver involvement in their care and hinders the ability to align care plans with patient values and preferences. Shared decision making is a potentially beneficial process to implement with individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to provide more holistic, patient-centered dysarthria and dysphagia treatment. Shared decision making promotes active involvement by patients/caregivers by informing them of potential treatment options, understanding their values and preferences, and aligning their desires with treatment options to determine the most optimal individualized care plan.\n \n \n \n The benefits and barriers to incorporating shared decision making within ALS multidisciplinary clinics are discussed in this clinical focus article. Furthermore, a fictional case study example of how to apply shared decision making to dysarthria and dysphagia management of individuals with ALS is provided.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional health care decision-making models center on clinicians making decisions for patients/caregivers based on the best available research evidence. However, this diminishes patient/caregiver involvement in their care and hinders the ability to align care plans with patient values and preferences. Shared decision making is a potentially beneficial process to implement with individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to provide more holistic, patient-centered dysarthria and dysphagia treatment. Shared decision making promotes active involvement by patients/caregivers by informing them of potential treatment options, understanding their values and preferences, and aligning their desires with treatment options to determine the most optimal individualized care plan.
The benefits and barriers to incorporating shared decision making within ALS multidisciplinary clinics are discussed in this clinical focus article. Furthermore, a fictional case study example of how to apply shared decision making to dysarthria and dysphagia management of individuals with ALS is provided.
传统的医疗决策模式以临床医生根据现有的最佳研究证据为患者/护理人员做出决策为中心。然而,这削弱了患者/护理者对其护理的参与,并阻碍了根据患者的价值观和偏好调整护理计划的能力。共同决策是一种潜在的有益程序,可用于肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者,以提供更全面的、以患者为中心的构音障碍和吞咽困难治疗。共同决策可促进患者/护理人员积极参与,告知他们潜在的治疗方案,了解他们的价值观和偏好,并将他们的愿望与治疗方案相结合,以确定最佳的个性化护理计划。 这篇临床焦点文章讨论了将共同决策纳入 ALS 多学科诊所的好处和障碍。此外,文章还提供了一个虚构的案例研究,说明如何将共同决策应用于 ALS 患者的构音障碍和吞咽困难管理。