Carbon Cycle Models Quantify for a Green and Low-Carbon Economy

G. Ahamer
{"title":"Carbon Cycle Models Quantify for a Green and Low-Carbon Economy","authors":"G. Ahamer","doi":"10.47852/bonviewglce42022240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels represent the largest anthropogenic disruption of the natural global carbon cycle and lead to an undesirable increase in atmospheric CO2 levels. The so-called \"carbon-neutral\" renewable energy source biomass appears to be a promising replacement for fossil fuels. The \"Combined Energy and Biosphere Model\" (CEBM), was developed as a method for calculating the atmospheric CO2 content after intensive use of biomass. It includes (i) a biosphere part computing the annual cycle of carbon in the biosphere on 2,433 grid elements covering the continents’ plant mass and soil, as well as (ii) an energy economic part for calculating the fossil CO2 emissions of 119 countries. As the history of understanding the carbon cycle (including quantification of plant growth and decay by formulae, inclusion of deforestation, fossil fuel use and the fertilizer effect) shows, such a global carbon cycle model (as the CEBM) provides the needed methodology to assess the net effects of large-scale biomass energy use on the plant’s atmosphere. Results show that biomass (in a systemic view) is “only half as carbon neutral” as previously thought, even on a principal level. The conclusions indicate that (even if biomass is a valuable mitigation strategy) its global potential is limited. When interpreting CEBM scenarios, as a very first priority, reducing the current annual increase in energy demand is most highly needed for preserving climate.","PeriodicalId":504488,"journal":{"name":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewglce42022240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels represent the largest anthropogenic disruption of the natural global carbon cycle and lead to an undesirable increase in atmospheric CO2 levels. The so-called "carbon-neutral" renewable energy source biomass appears to be a promising replacement for fossil fuels. The "Combined Energy and Biosphere Model" (CEBM), was developed as a method for calculating the atmospheric CO2 content after intensive use of biomass. It includes (i) a biosphere part computing the annual cycle of carbon in the biosphere on 2,433 grid elements covering the continents’ plant mass and soil, as well as (ii) an energy economic part for calculating the fossil CO2 emissions of 119 countries. As the history of understanding the carbon cycle (including quantification of plant growth and decay by formulae, inclusion of deforestation, fossil fuel use and the fertilizer effect) shows, such a global carbon cycle model (as the CEBM) provides the needed methodology to assess the net effects of large-scale biomass energy use on the plant’s atmosphere. Results show that biomass (in a systemic view) is “only half as carbon neutral” as previously thought, even on a principal level. The conclusions indicate that (even if biomass is a valuable mitigation strategy) its global potential is limited. When interpreting CEBM scenarios, as a very first priority, reducing the current annual increase in energy demand is most highly needed for preserving climate.
碳循环模型量化绿色低碳经济
化石燃料燃烧产生的二氧化碳排放是对全球自然碳循环的最大人为破坏,并导致大气中二氧化碳水平的不良上升。所谓的 "碳中性 "可再生能源生物质似乎是一种很有前途的化石燃料替代品。能源与生物圈综合模型"(CEBM)是作为一种计算大量使用生物质后大气中二氧化碳含量的方法而开发的。该模型包括(i)生物圈部分,计算生物圈中碳的年循环周期,网格元素有 2433 个,涵盖各大洲的植物和土壤;(ii)能源经济部分,计算 119 个国家的化石二氧化碳排放量。碳循环的历史(包括通过公式量化植物的生长和腐烂、纳入森林砍伐、化石燃料使用和肥料效应)表明,这种全球碳循环模型(如 CEBM)提供了评估大规模生物质能源使用对植物大气净影响所需的方法。结果表明,生物质(从系统角度看)"只有以前认为的碳中性的一半",即使在主要层面上也是如此。结论表明(即使生物质能是一种有价值的减排策略),其全球潜力也是有限的。在解释经济、社会和环境管理(CEBM)方案时,首要任务是减少目前每年增加的能源需求,这是保护气候的最迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信