Fish gill chemosensing: knowledge gaps and inconsistencies.

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Erin M Leonard, Cosima S Porteus, Deidre Brink, William K Milsom
{"title":"Fish gill chemosensing: knowledge gaps and inconsistencies.","authors":"Erin M Leonard, Cosima S Porteus, Deidre Brink, William K Milsom","doi":"10.1007/s00360-024-01553-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review, we explore the inconsistencies in the data and gaps in our knowledge that exist in what is currently known regarding gill chemosensors which drive the cardiorespiratory reflexes in fish. Although putative serotonergic neuroepithelial cells (NEC) dominate the literature, it is clear that other neurotransmitters are involved (adrenaline, noradrenaline, acetylcholine, purines, and dopamine). And although we assume that these agents act on neurons synapsing with the NECs or in the afferent or efferent limbs of the paths between chemosensors and central integration sites, this process remains elusive and may explain current discrepancies or species differences in the literature. To date it has been impossible to link the distribution of NECs to species sensitivity to different stimuli or fish lifestyles and while the gills have been shown to be the primary sensing site for respiratory gases, the location (gills, oro-branchial cavity or elsewhere) and orientation (external/water or internal/blood sensing) of the NECs are highly variable between species of water and air breathing fish. Much of what has been described so far comes from studies of hypoxic responses in fish, however, changes in CO<sub>2</sub>, ammonia and lactate have all been shown to elicit cardio-respiratory responses and all have been suggested to arise from stimulation of gill NECs. Our view of the role of NECs is broadening as we begin to understand the polymodal nature of these cells. We begin by presenting the fundamental picture of gill chemosensing that has developed, followed by some key unanswered questions about gill chemosensing in general.</p>","PeriodicalId":56033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systems and Environmental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systems and Environmental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-024-01553-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this review, we explore the inconsistencies in the data and gaps in our knowledge that exist in what is currently known regarding gill chemosensors which drive the cardiorespiratory reflexes in fish. Although putative serotonergic neuroepithelial cells (NEC) dominate the literature, it is clear that other neurotransmitters are involved (adrenaline, noradrenaline, acetylcholine, purines, and dopamine). And although we assume that these agents act on neurons synapsing with the NECs or in the afferent or efferent limbs of the paths between chemosensors and central integration sites, this process remains elusive and may explain current discrepancies or species differences in the literature. To date it has been impossible to link the distribution of NECs to species sensitivity to different stimuli or fish lifestyles and while the gills have been shown to be the primary sensing site for respiratory gases, the location (gills, oro-branchial cavity or elsewhere) and orientation (external/water or internal/blood sensing) of the NECs are highly variable between species of water and air breathing fish. Much of what has been described so far comes from studies of hypoxic responses in fish, however, changes in CO2, ammonia and lactate have all been shown to elicit cardio-respiratory responses and all have been suggested to arise from stimulation of gill NECs. Our view of the role of NECs is broadening as we begin to understand the polymodal nature of these cells. We begin by presenting the fundamental picture of gill chemosensing that has developed, followed by some key unanswered questions about gill chemosensing in general.

Abstract Image

鱼鳃化学传感:知识差距和不一致。
在这篇综述中,我们探讨了目前已知的有关驱动鱼类心肺反射的鳃化学传感器的数据中存在的不一致之处和知识空白。虽然推测的血清素能神经上皮细胞(NEC)在文献中占主导地位,但其他神经递质(肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素、乙酰胆碱、嘌呤和多巴胺)显然也参与其中。尽管我们假定这些药剂作用于与 NECs 发生突触的神经元,或作用于化学传感器与中枢整合点之间路径的传入或传出肢体,但这一过程仍然难以捉摸,这可能是目前文献中存在差异或物种差异的原因。迄今为止,还无法将 NECs 的分布与物种对不同刺激或鱼类生活方式的敏感性联系起来。虽然鳃已被证明是呼吸气体的主要感应部位,但 NECs 的位置(鳃、口支腔或其他部位)和方向(外部/水或内部/血液感应)在呼吸水和空气的鱼类物种之间存在很大差异。然而,二氧化碳、氨和乳酸盐的变化都被证明能引起心肺反应,而且都被认为是由刺激鳃部 NECs 引起的。随着我们开始了解 NECs 的多模式性质,我们对其作用的认识也在不断扩大。我们首先介绍了已形成的鳃化学传感的基本情况,然后介绍了一般鳃化学传感的一些关键未解之谜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Physiology B publishes peer-reviewed original articles and reviews on the comparative physiology of invertebrate and vertebrate animals. Special emphasis is placed on integrative studies that elucidate mechanisms at the whole-animal, organ, tissue, cellular and/or molecular levels. Review papers report on the current state of knowledge in an area of comparative physiology, and directions in which future research is needed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信