Performance of Medication Tasks: Relationship Among Patient-Reported Outcomes, Performance-Based Assessments, and Objective Assessments.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jaclyn K Schwartz, Katherine Aylmer, Samara Green, Sami Tayeb, Timothy J Wolf, Elizabeth Unni, Emily Somerville
{"title":"Performance of Medication Tasks: Relationship Among Patient-Reported Outcomes, Performance-Based Assessments, and Objective Assessments.","authors":"Jaclyn K Schwartz, Katherine Aylmer, Samara Green, Sami Tayeb, Timothy J Wolf, Elizabeth Unni, Emily Somerville","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational therapy practitioners use standardized assessments to guide their clinical decision-making, but it is unclear how well performance on standardized assessments translates to performance at home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the concurrent and predictive validity of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Exploratory study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants completed standardized assessments in a lab or at home, which were followed by home-based electronic monitoring of medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Sixty community-dwelling adults with hypertension or stroke who independently took antihypertensive medications.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Participants completed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale, the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Reasons Scale, the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Medication Management subtask, and the Executive Function Performance Test-Enhanced Medication Management subtest. Then, they used an electronic pill cap to monitor medication adherence at home for 1 month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments in the context of medication management and adherence demonstrated poor concurrent and predictive validity to medication adherence at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There is a gap between what people think they will do, what they can do on a standardized assessment, and what they actually do at home. Future research is needed to strengthen concurrent and predictive validity to clinically meaningful outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners should use caution when using standardized assessments to try to predict client performance at home. They should also continue to use a battery of assessments, clinical reasoning, and client preferences to guide their decision-making for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Occupational therapy practitioners use standardized assessments to guide their clinical decision-making, but it is unclear how well performance on standardized assessments translates to performance at home.

Objective: To understand the concurrent and predictive validity of patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.

Design: Exploratory study.

Setting: Participants completed standardized assessments in a lab or at home, which were followed by home-based electronic monitoring of medication adherence.

Participants: Sixty community-dwelling adults with hypertension or stroke who independently took antihypertensive medications.

Outcomes and measures: Participants completed the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Scale, the Hill-Bone Medication Adherence Reasons Scale, the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills Medication Management subtask, and the Executive Function Performance Test-Enhanced Medication Management subtest. Then, they used an electronic pill cap to monitor medication adherence at home for 1 month.

Results: Patient-reported outcomes and performance-based assessments in the context of medication management and adherence demonstrated poor concurrent and predictive validity to medication adherence at home.

Conclusions and relevance: There is a gap between what people think they will do, what they can do on a standardized assessment, and what they actually do at home. Future research is needed to strengthen concurrent and predictive validity to clinically meaningful outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Occupational therapy practitioners should use caution when using standardized assessments to try to predict client performance at home. They should also continue to use a battery of assessments, clinical reasoning, and client preferences to guide their decision-making for monitoring performance at home within the context of medication management and adherence.

用药任务的执行情况:患者报告结果、基于表现的评估和客观评估之间的关系。
重要性:职业治疗从业人员使用标准化评估来指导他们的临床决策,但目前尚不清楚标准化评估的结果如何转化为患者在家中的表现:目的:了解患者报告的结果和基于表现的评估在监测药物管理和依从性方面的同时有效性和预测有效性:设计:探索性研究:参与者在实验室或家中完成标准化评估,然后在家中对用药依从性进行电子监测:60名居住在社区、独立服用降压药的成人高血压或中风患者:参与者完成希尔骨用药依从性量表、希尔骨用药依从性原因量表、自我护理技能用药管理绩效评估子任务和执行功能绩效测试-强化用药管理子测试。然后,他们在家中使用电子药帽监测用药依从性,为期一个月:结果:在用药管理和用药依从性方面,患者报告的结果和基于表现的评估对在家用药依从性的并发有效性和预测有效性较差:人们认为他们会做什么、他们在标准化评估中能做什么以及他们在家实际做了什么之间存在差距。未来的研究需要加强并发有效性和预测有效性,以获得有临床意义的结果。通俗摘要:职业治疗从业者在使用标准化评估来预测客户在家中的表现时应谨慎。他们还应继续使用一系列评估、临床推理和客户偏好来指导决策,以便在药物管理和依从性的背景下监测客户在家的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信