Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Uveitic Macular Edema.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1080/09273948.2024.2344709
Enny Oyeniran, Sanjeeb Bhandari, Ali Amir, Matias Soifer, Sunil Bellur, Susan Vitale, H Nida Sen, Shilpa Kodati
{"title":"Treatment Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Uveitic Macular Edema.","authors":"Enny Oyeniran, Sanjeeb Bhandari, Ali Amir, Matias Soifer, Sunil Bellur, Susan Vitale, H Nida Sen, Shilpa Kodati","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2024.2344709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept for UME (uveitic macular).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of records of patients that received aflibercept for UME from January 2017 to August 2022 was conducted. The primary outcomes were mean change in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) 6 and 12 months from the start of aflibercept treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 eyes of 12 patients were included. Indications for treatment included eyes that had previously demonstrated a history of elevated intraocular pressure secondary to a steroid response (<i>n</i> = 10) or a history of non-response or partial response to local corticosteroids (<i>n</i> = 6). Fifteen eyes (94%) demonstrated a reduction in CST after their initial injection. At 6-months, mean VA gain was 2.6 ± 7.7 letters (<i>p</i> = 0.24) from a mean VA of 67.8 ± 10.7 letters at baseline and mean CST improved by 97.6 ± 113.5 μm (<i>p</i> = 0.004) from 458.6 ± 123.1 μm at baseline. Fourteen eyes had 12-months of follow up and received a median of 4 injections over 12 visits. The mean VA at 12-months remained stable compared to baseline (mean change of -1.4 ± 12.5 letters (<i>p</i> = 0.87)) while the CST improved by a mean of 90.9 ± 114.6 μm (<i>p</i> = 0.053) compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravitreal aflibercept injections resulted in reduced central subfield thickness at all time-points. It appears to be an effective treatment alternative for UME, particularly for patients who are not responsive to local corticosteroids or who have contraindications to corticosteroid treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1145-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2024.2344709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept for UME (uveitic macular).

Methods: A retrospective review of records of patients that received aflibercept for UME from January 2017 to August 2022 was conducted. The primary outcomes were mean change in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) 6 and 12 months from the start of aflibercept treatment.

Results: A total of 16 eyes of 12 patients were included. Indications for treatment included eyes that had previously demonstrated a history of elevated intraocular pressure secondary to a steroid response (n = 10) or a history of non-response or partial response to local corticosteroids (n = 6). Fifteen eyes (94%) demonstrated a reduction in CST after their initial injection. At 6-months, mean VA gain was 2.6 ± 7.7 letters (p = 0.24) from a mean VA of 67.8 ± 10.7 letters at baseline and mean CST improved by 97.6 ± 113.5 μm (p = 0.004) from 458.6 ± 123.1 μm at baseline. Fourteen eyes had 12-months of follow up and received a median of 4 injections over 12 visits. The mean VA at 12-months remained stable compared to baseline (mean change of -1.4 ± 12.5 letters (p = 0.87)) while the CST improved by a mean of 90.9 ± 114.6 μm (p = 0.053) compared to baseline.

Conclusion: Intravitreal aflibercept injections resulted in reduced central subfield thickness at all time-points. It appears to be an effective treatment alternative for UME, particularly for patients who are not responsive to local corticosteroids or who have contraindications to corticosteroid treatment.

玻璃体内阿弗利百普治疗葡萄膜炎性黄斑水肿的疗效。
背景/目的评估玻璃体内aflibercept治疗UME(葡萄膜炎性黄斑)的疗效:对2017年1月至2022年8月期间接受aflibercept治疗UME的患者记录进行了回顾性回顾。主要结果是自开始接受aflibercept治疗6个月和12个月后视力(VA)和中央子场厚度(CST)的平均变化:结果:共纳入了 12 名患者的 16 只眼睛。治疗指征包括曾因类固醇反应继发眼压升高(10 例)或对局部皮质类固醇无反应或部分反应(6 例)。15只眼睛(94%)在首次注射后CST有所下降。6 个月后,平均视力从基线时的 67.8 ± 10.7 个字母提高到 2.6 ± 7.7 个字母(p = 0.24),平均视力从基线时的 458.6 ± 123.1 μm 提高到 97.6 ± 113.5 μm(p = 0.004)。有 14 只眼睛接受了 12 个月的随访,在 12 次随访中接受了 4 次注射。12个月后的平均视力与基线相比保持稳定(平均变化为-1.4 ± 12.5个字母(p = 0.87)),而CST与基线相比平均提高了90.9 ± 114.6 μm(p = 0.053):结论:玻璃体内注射阿弗利百普能在所有时间点上减少中央子场厚度。它似乎是治疗 UME 的一种有效替代疗法,尤其适用于对局部皮质类固醇治疗无效或有皮质类固醇治疗禁忌症的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信