MRI-CEUS fusion-guided lymphatic mapping as a preoperative strategy for lymphedema patients undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
{"title":"MRI-CEUS fusion-guided lymphatic mapping as a preoperative strategy for lymphedema patients undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is useful in mapping lymphatic vessels in upper limb lymphedema; this study was aimed to evaluate its efficiency in lower limb lymphedema and investigate whether magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) enhance the efficiency of CEUS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study enrolled 48 patients with lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery who received MRL and/or CEUS in addition to conventional indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography. The number of anastomotic sites and the duration per site (DPS) for LVA surgery were described and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 48 patients subjected to analysis, it was observed that 12 (25%), 20 (41.67%), and 16 (33.33%) of them received ICG, ICG+CEUS, and ICG+CEUS+MRL, respectively. The ICG+CEUS group demonstrated a significant increase in the number of LVAs (median, 5; range, 4-7), compared with the ICG group (median, 2; range, 1-4) (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Moreover, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group exhibited a higher number of LVAs (median, 8; range, 7-8.25) compared with both the ICG+CEUS and ICG groups (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). For lower limb lymphedema, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group displayed an elevated number of LVAs (median, 8; interquartile range, 7-9) (<em>P</em> = .003), in contrast to the ICG group (median, 3; interquartile range, 1.75-4.25). Furthermore, the DPS in the ICG+CEUS+MRL group (median, 50.56; interquartile range, 48.13-59.29) (<em>P</em> = .005) exhibited a remarkable decrease when compared with the ICG group (median, 131.25; interquartile range, 86.75-198.13]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MRL-CEUS fusion demonstrates superior performance in the identification of lymphatic vessels for lymphedema.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X24002257/pdfft?md5=980ba3393c59d6efba3d47afb5746a64&pid=1-s2.0-S2213333X24002257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X24002257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is useful in mapping lymphatic vessels in upper limb lymphedema; this study was aimed to evaluate its efficiency in lower limb lymphedema and investigate whether magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) enhance the efficiency of CEUS.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 48 patients with lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery who received MRL and/or CEUS in addition to conventional indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography. The number of anastomotic sites and the duration per site (DPS) for LVA surgery were described and compared.

Results

Among the 48 patients subjected to analysis, it was observed that 12 (25%), 20 (41.67%), and 16 (33.33%) of them received ICG, ICG+CEUS, and ICG+CEUS+MRL, respectively. The ICG+CEUS group demonstrated a significant increase in the number of LVAs (median, 5; range, 4-7), compared with the ICG group (median, 2; range, 1-4) (P < .001). Moreover, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group exhibited a higher number of LVAs (median, 8; range, 7-8.25) compared with both the ICG+CEUS and ICG groups (P < .001). For lower limb lymphedema, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group displayed an elevated number of LVAs (median, 8; interquartile range, 7-9) (P = .003), in contrast to the ICG group (median, 3; interquartile range, 1.75-4.25). Furthermore, the DPS in the ICG+CEUS+MRL group (median, 50.56; interquartile range, 48.13-59.29) (P = .005) exhibited a remarkable decrease when compared with the ICG group (median, 131.25; interquartile range, 86.75-198.13]).

Conclusions

MRL-CEUS fusion demonstrates superior performance in the identification of lymphatic vessels for lymphedema.

MRI-CEUS 融合引导下的淋巴管图绘制作为淋巴管静脉吻合手术淋巴水肿患者的术前策略
研究目的对比增强超声(CEUS)可用于绘制上肢淋巴水肿的淋巴管图,本研究旨在评估其在下肢淋巴水肿中的效率,并探讨磁共振淋巴管成像(MRL)是否可提高CEUS的效率:这项回顾性研究纳入了 48 名接受淋巴-静脉吻合术(LVA)手术的淋巴水肿患者,他们除了接受传统的吲哚菁绿(ICG)淋巴管造影术外,还接受了 MRL 和/或 CEUS。对 LVA 手术的吻合部位数量和每个部位的持续时间(DPS)进行了描述和比较:在接受分析的 48 例患者中,有 12 例(25%)、20 例(41.67%)和 16 例(33.33%)分别接受了 ICG、ICG+CEUS 和 ICG+CEUS+MRL。与 ICG 组(中位数,2 [范围,1 - 4])相比,ICG+CEUS 组的 LVA 数量显著增加(中位数,5 [范围,4 - 7])(p < .001)。此外,与 ICG+CEUS 组和 ICG 组相比,ICG+CEUS+MRL 组显示出更多的 LVA(中位数,8 [范围,7 - 8.25])(p < .001)。在下肢淋巴水肿方面,ICG+CEUS+MRL 组的 LVA 数量较多(中位数,8 [四分位间范围,7 - 9])(p = .003),而 ICG 组的 LVA 数量较少(中位数,3 [四分位间范围,1.75 - 4.25])。此外,ICG+CEUS+MRL 组的 DPS(中位数,50.56 [四分位间范围,48.13 - 59.29])(p = .005)与 ICG 组(中位数,131.25 [四分位间范围,86.75 - 198.13])相比显著下降:结论:MRL-CEUS 融合在淋巴水肿的淋巴管识别方面表现优异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders SURGERYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE&n-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
328
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信