Kidney-Sparing Surgery Has Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Ureteral Urothelial Carcinoma.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kang Liu, Hongda Zhao, Chi Fai Ng, Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh, Pilar Laguna, Jean de la Rosette
{"title":"Kidney-Sparing Surgery Has Equivalent Oncological Outcomes to Radical Nephroureterectomy for Ureteral Urothelial Carcinoma.","authors":"Kang Liu, Hongda Zhao, Chi Fai Ng, Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh, Pilar Laguna, Jean de la Rosette","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction and Objective:</i></b> Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has gained increasing interest recently. However, there is limited contemporary data regarding the role of KSS in ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, we investigated the survival outcomes of ureteral urothelial carcinoma after KSS from a large, prospective international UTUC registry. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society-Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry included patients with UTUC who received KSS or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2014 and 2019. In this study, we included patients with ureteral UTUC only. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), upper tract recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the tumor features' differences between groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 391 patients with ureteral UTUC, 309 (79.0%) received RNU and 82 (21.0%) received KSS by ureteroscopy with laser ablation (<i>n</i> = 28) or segmental resection (<i>n</i> = 54). After PSM, there were no differences in OS (<i>p</i> = 0.525), CSS (<i>p</i> = 0.487), upper tract RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.147), intravesical RFS (<i>p</i> = 0.989), PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.617), and MFS (<i>p</i> = 0.336) between KSS and RNU. There were no significant differences between ureteroscopic ablation and segmental resection in OS, CSS, intravesical RFS, PFS, and MFS with RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse OS and CSS outcomes than other tumor locations following segmental resection. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with ureteral UTUC, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between KSS and RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse survival outcomes over other tumor locations following segmental resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has gained increasing interest recently. However, there is limited contemporary data regarding the role of KSS in ureteral urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, we investigated the survival outcomes of ureteral urothelial carcinoma after KSS from a large, prospective international UTUC registry. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society-Urothelial Carcinomas of the Upper Tract (CROES-UTUC) Registry included patients with UTUC who received KSS or radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2014 and 2019. In this study, we included patients with ureteral UTUC only. Study outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), upper tract recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the tumor features' differences between groups. Results: Of the 391 patients with ureteral UTUC, 309 (79.0%) received RNU and 82 (21.0%) received KSS by ureteroscopy with laser ablation (n = 28) or segmental resection (n = 54). After PSM, there were no differences in OS (p = 0.525), CSS (p = 0.487), upper tract RFS (p = 0.147), intravesical RFS (p = 0.989), PFS (p = 0.617), and MFS (p = 0.336) between KSS and RNU. There were no significant differences between ureteroscopic ablation and segmental resection in OS, CSS, intravesical RFS, PFS, and MFS with RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse OS and CSS outcomes than other tumor locations following segmental resection. Conclusions: In patients with ureteral UTUC, no significant differences in long-term survival outcomes were observed between KSS and RNU. Proximal ureteral UTUC had worse survival outcomes over other tumor locations following segmental resection.

对于输尿管尿路上皮癌,保肾手术与根治性肾切除术具有同等的肿瘤治疗效果。
导言和目的:近来,针对上尿路尿路癌(UTUC)的保肾手术(KSS)越来越受到关注。然而,有关 KSS 在输尿管尿路上皮癌中的作用的现代数据却很有限。因此,我们从一个大型前瞻性国际UTUC登记处调查了KSS术后输尿管尿路上皮癌的生存结果:内尿路学会临床研究办公室-输尿管上段癌登记处(CROES-UTUC)纳入了2014年至2019年期间接受KSS或根治性肾切除术(RNU)的UTUC患者。在本研究中,我们仅纳入了输尿管UTUC患者。研究结果包括总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、上段无复发生存期(RFS)、膀胱内RFS、无进展生存期(PFS)和无转移生存期(MFS)。为平衡组间肿瘤特征的差异,进行了倾向评分匹配(PSM):在391名输尿管UTUC患者中,309人(79.0%)接受了RNU治疗,82人(21.0%)通过输尿管镜激光消融术(28人)或节段切除术(54人)接受了KSS治疗。PSM 后,KSS 和 RNU 的 OS(p=0.525)、CSS(p=0.487)、上段 RFS(p=0.147)、膀胱内 RFS(p=0.989)、PFS(p=0.617)和 MFS(p=0.336)均无差异。输尿管镜消融术和节段切除术的 OS、CSS、膀胱内 RFS、PFS 和 MFS 与 RNU 相似。与其他肿瘤位置相比,近端输尿管UTUC在分段切除后的OS和CSS结果更差:结论:在输尿管UTUC患者中,KSS和RNU的长期生存结果无明显差异。近端输尿管UTUC在分段切除后的生存预后比其他肿瘤位置的患者差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信