Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Benjamin C Pierson, Amanda Banaag, Miranda Lynn Janvrin, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos
{"title":"Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.","authors":"Benjamin C Pierson, Amanda Banaag, Miranda Lynn Janvrin, Tracey Pérez Koehlmoos","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs decision) has already had profound impact on reproductive health care in the United States. Some studies have reported increased incidence of vasectomy after the Dobbs decision. The Military Health System (MHS) provides a unique opportunity to evaluate this relationship in a universally insured, geographically representative population. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of vasectomies among all male beneficiaries in the MHS, ages 18 to 64, from 2018 to 2022. Beneficiaries receiving a vasectomy were identified via billing data extraction from the MHS Data Repository (MDR). Descriptive statistics of demographic factors of all those receiving a vasectomy in the study period were evaluated. Crude and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate for differences in demographic variables in those receiving a vasectomy pre-Dobb's decision as compared to after the Dobb's decision. The total number of men receiving a vasectomy each month over the study period was analyzed, as were the numbers in a state immediately implementing abortion access restrictions (Texas), and one without any restrictions on abortion access (Virginia). Our analysis found that men receiving a vasectomy post-Dobbs decision were more likely to be younger, unmarried, and of junior military rank than prior to the Dobbs decision. In the months following the Dobbs decision in 2022 (June-December), there was a 22.1% increase in vasectomy utilization as compared to the averages of those months in 2018-2021. Further, it was found that the relative increase in vasectomy after the Dobbs decision was greater in Texas (29.3%) compared to Virginia (10.6%). Our findings highlight the impact of the Dobbs decision on reproductive health care utilization outside of abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00905-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs decision) has already had profound impact on reproductive health care in the United States. Some studies have reported increased incidence of vasectomy after the Dobbs decision. The Military Health System (MHS) provides a unique opportunity to evaluate this relationship in a universally insured, geographically representative population. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of vasectomies among all male beneficiaries in the MHS, ages 18 to 64, from 2018 to 2022. Beneficiaries receiving a vasectomy were identified via billing data extraction from the MHS Data Repository (MDR). Descriptive statistics of demographic factors of all those receiving a vasectomy in the study period were evaluated. Crude and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate for differences in demographic variables in those receiving a vasectomy pre-Dobb's decision as compared to after the Dobb's decision. The total number of men receiving a vasectomy each month over the study period was analyzed, as were the numbers in a state immediately implementing abortion access restrictions (Texas), and one without any restrictions on abortion access (Virginia). Our analysis found that men receiving a vasectomy post-Dobbs decision were more likely to be younger, unmarried, and of junior military rank than prior to the Dobbs decision. In the months following the Dobbs decision in 2022 (June-December), there was a 22.1% increase in vasectomy utilization as compared to the averages of those months in 2018-2021. Further, it was found that the relative increase in vasectomy after the Dobbs decision was greater in Texas (29.3%) compared to Virginia (10.6%). Our findings highlight the impact of the Dobbs decision on reproductive health care utilization outside of abortion.

Abstract Image

罗伊诉韦德案翻案后军队医疗系统中输精管切除术的发生率。
多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(多布斯案判决)已经对美国的生殖保健产生了深远的影响。一些研究报告称,多布斯案判决后,输精管切除术的发生率有所增加。军事卫生系统(MHS)提供了一个独特的机会,在一个普遍投保、具有地域代表性的人群中评估这种关系。我们在 2018 年至 2022 年期间对军事医疗系统中 18 至 64 岁的所有男性受益人进行了输精管结扎手术的回顾性横断面研究。接受输精管结扎手术的受益人是通过从医疗保险系统数据存储库(MDR)中提取账单数据确定的。对研究期间所有接受输精管结扎手术者的人口统计学因素进行了描述性统计评估。使用粗略和多变量逻辑回归模型来评估在多布决定之前和之后接受输精管结扎手术的男性在人口统计学变量方面的差异。我们分析了研究期间每月接受输精管结扎手术的男性总人数,以及立即实施堕胎限制的州(得克萨斯州)和没有堕胎限制的州(弗吉尼亚州)的人数。我们的分析发现,与多布斯决定之前相比,多布斯决定之后接受输精管结扎手术的男性更有可能更年轻、未婚、军衔更低。在 2022 年多布斯裁决后的几个月(6 月至 12 月),输精管结扎术的使用率比 2018-2021 年这几个月的平均值增加了 22.1%。此外,我们还发现,与弗吉尼亚州(10.6%)相比,得克萨斯州(29.3%)在多布斯裁决后输精管切除术的相对增幅更大。我们的研究结果凸显了多布斯决定对人工流产以外的生殖保健利用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信