Rectal implantation cyst successfully diagnosed using endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic ultrasonography.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s12328-024-01968-1
Eisuke Kameoka, Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Takumi Yanagita, Wataru Sakamoto, Masao Kobayakawa, Yuko Hashimoto, Hiromasa Ohira
{"title":"Rectal implantation cyst successfully diagnosed using endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic ultrasonography.","authors":"Eisuke Kameoka, Takuto Hikichi, Minami Hashimoto, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Takumi Yanagita, Wataru Sakamoto, Masao Kobayakawa, Yuko Hashimoto, Hiromasa Ohira","doi":"10.1007/s12328-024-01968-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An 81-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection with instrumented anastomosis using the double stapling technique for rectal cancer 5 years ago was found to have an enlarged anastomotic mass on computed tomography. On colonoscopy, the anastomotic mass was observed as a 30-mm-sized subepithelial lesion, which was presumed to be the submucosa on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration was performed; however, no cellular components were collected. Therefore, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed to remove the entire anastomotic mass. However, any lesion in the submucosa was not detected during ESD, and the lesion was suspected to be located deeper than the submucosa. Therefore, EUS was performed from the muscule layer just below the dissected submucosa, and the mass was detected outside the muscle layer in contact with the rectal wall. Upon endoscopic incision of the muscle layer, milky white mucus was excreted into the rectal lumen. Subsequently, the scope was advanced to an area outside the muscle layer where the mass was located, which was a closed lumen with mucus retention. Surface biopsy of the closed lumen revealed normal colonic mucosa. Therefore, the subepithelial lesion was diagnosed as an implantation cyst arising outside the rectal wall.</p>","PeriodicalId":10364,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-024-01968-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An 81-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection with instrumented anastomosis using the double stapling technique for rectal cancer 5 years ago was found to have an enlarged anastomotic mass on computed tomography. On colonoscopy, the anastomotic mass was observed as a 30-mm-sized subepithelial lesion, which was presumed to be the submucosa on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration was performed; however, no cellular components were collected. Therefore, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed to remove the entire anastomotic mass. However, any lesion in the submucosa was not detected during ESD, and the lesion was suspected to be located deeper than the submucosa. Therefore, EUS was performed from the muscule layer just below the dissected submucosa, and the mass was detected outside the muscle layer in contact with the rectal wall. Upon endoscopic incision of the muscle layer, milky white mucus was excreted into the rectal lumen. Subsequently, the scope was advanced to an area outside the muscle layer where the mass was located, which was a closed lumen with mucus retention. Surface biopsy of the closed lumen revealed normal colonic mucosa. Therefore, the subepithelial lesion was diagnosed as an implantation cyst arising outside the rectal wall.

利用内窥镜肌切开术和内窥镜超声波检查成功诊断出直肠种植囊肿。
一名 81 岁的妇女在 5 年前因直肠癌接受了腹腔镜辅助低位前切除术,并使用双缝合技术进行了器械吻合。结肠镜检查时,发现吻合口肿块为 30 毫米大小的上皮下病变,内镜超声检查(EUS)推测为粘膜下病变。患者在 EUS 引导下进行了细针穿刺,但未采集到细胞成分。因此,进行了内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)以切除整个吻合口肿块。然而,ESD 期间并未发现粘膜下的任何病变,而且怀疑病变位于粘膜下的更深处。因此,从剥离的粘膜下层肌肉层开始进行 EUS,在与直肠壁接触的肌肉层外发现了肿块。内窥镜切开肌肉层后,乳白色粘液排入直肠腔。随后,将内窥镜推进到肌肉层外的肿块所在区域,这是一个封闭的管腔,有粘液滞留。对封闭的管腔进行表面活检发现结肠粘膜正常。因此,上皮下病变被诊断为直肠壁外的种植囊肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: The journal publishes Case Reports and Clinical Reviews on all aspects of the digestive tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Critical Case Reports that show originality or have educational implications for diagnosis and treatment are especially encouraged for submission. Personal reviews of clinical gastroenterology are also welcomed. The journal aims for quick publication of such critical Case Reports and Clinical Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信