Yi Luo, Huijing Wang, Junjun Cao, Jinxiao Li, Qun Tian, Guoyong Leng, Dev Niyogi
{"title":"Evaluation of machine learning-dynamical hybrid method incorporating remote sensing data for in-season maize yield prediction under drought","authors":"Yi Luo, Huijing Wang, Junjun Cao, Jinxiao Li, Qun Tian, Guoyong Leng, Dev Niyogi","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective yield forecasting is a key strategy for adaptation when facing food loss to climate variability. Currently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an emerging remote-sensing index owing to its high relevance to plant photosynthesis, and sensitivity to drought. Despite many studies have focused on drought monitoring and production assessment by SIF, little puts it into practice for in-season yield prediction. In this study, we combined multi-source satellite and meteorological data, especially coupling with subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) dynamic atmospheric prediction climate model (IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2), with an addition of SIF, to predict maize yields in the U.S. Corn Belt, based on the developed machine learning dynamical hybrid model (MHCF). By comparison, we found that SIF performed well in the correlation analysis with yield, with average correlations up to 0.719 in August. Then we utilized different algorithms, different models (S2S data for MHCF, climate data for the Benchmark), and different input combinations to train and predict maize yields. All four algorithms using SIF significantly improved prediction performance. S2S + VIs + SIF combination (FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF) can achieve the best performance, while the XGBoost algorithm reached 0.897 of R<sup>2</sup>. With the best combination, it can achieve 4 months before maize harvest (with R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.85, and RMSE < 13 bu/acre). In 2012, the year had a severe drought, although predictive capability decreased in all the predictions, the models with SIF still maintained robust and improved the prediction (improved R<sup>2</sup> by 5.92%, and RMSE decreased by 18.08% of XGBoost). According to the study, it can be expected, the combination of MHCF and SIF will play a greater role in subseasonal yield prediction. We also provide an operational proposition of hybrid yield forecasting method to fully integrating climate prediction and machine learning for early notice of crop production losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10149-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective yield forecasting is a key strategy for adaptation when facing food loss to climate variability. Currently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an emerging remote-sensing index owing to its high relevance to plant photosynthesis, and sensitivity to drought. Despite many studies have focused on drought monitoring and production assessment by SIF, little puts it into practice for in-season yield prediction. In this study, we combined multi-source satellite and meteorological data, especially coupling with subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) dynamic atmospheric prediction climate model (IAP-CAS FGOALS-f2), with an addition of SIF, to predict maize yields in the U.S. Corn Belt, based on the developed machine learning dynamical hybrid model (MHCF). By comparison, we found that SIF performed well in the correlation analysis with yield, with average correlations up to 0.719 in August. Then we utilized different algorithms, different models (S2S data for MHCF, climate data for the Benchmark), and different input combinations to train and predict maize yields. All four algorithms using SIF significantly improved prediction performance. S2S + VIs + SIF combination (FGOALS-f2、NDVI、EVI、SIF) can achieve the best performance, while the XGBoost algorithm reached 0.897 of R2. With the best combination, it can achieve 4 months before maize harvest (with R2 value of 0.85, and RMSE < 13 bu/acre). In 2012, the year had a severe drought, although predictive capability decreased in all the predictions, the models with SIF still maintained robust and improved the prediction (improved R2 by 5.92%, and RMSE decreased by 18.08% of XGBoost). According to the study, it can be expected, the combination of MHCF and SIF will play a greater role in subseasonal yield prediction. We also provide an operational proposition of hybrid yield forecasting method to fully integrating climate prediction and machine learning for early notice of crop production losses.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.