Valentin Verdon, Lucie Malard, Flavien Collart, Antoine Adde, Erika Yashiro, Enrique Lara Pandi, Heidi Mod, David Singer, Hélène Niculita‐Hirzel, Nicolas Guex, Antoine Guisan
{"title":"Can we accurately predict the distribution of soil microorganism presence and relative abundance?","authors":"Valentin Verdon, Lucie Malard, Flavien Collart, Antoine Adde, Erika Yashiro, Enrique Lara Pandi, Heidi Mod, David Singer, Hélène Niculita‐Hirzel, Nicolas Guex, Antoine Guisan","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil microbes play a key role in shaping terrestrial ecosystems. It is therefore essential to understand what drives their distribution. While multivariate analyses have been used to characterise microbial communities and drivers of their spatial patterns, few studies have focused on predicting the distribution of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Here, we evaluate the potential of species distribution models (SDMs) to predict the presence–absence and relative abundance distribution of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protist ASVs in the western Swiss Alps. Advanced automated selection of abiotic covariates was used to circumvent the lack of knowledge on the ecology of each ASV. Presence–absence SDMs could be fitted for most ASVs, yielding better predictions than null models. Relative abundance SDMs performed less well, with low fit and predictive power overall, but displayed a good capacity to differentiate between sites with high and low relative abundance of the modelled ASV. SDMs for bacteria and archaea displayed better predictive power than for fungi and protists, suggesting a closer link of the former with the abiotic covariates used. Microorganism distributions were mostly related to edaphic covariates. In particular, pH was the most selected covariate across models. The study shows the potential of using SDM frameworks to predict the distribution of ASVs obtained from topsoil DNA. It also highlights the need for further development of precise edaphic mapping and scenario modelling to enhances prediction of microorganism distributions in the future.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil microbes play a key role in shaping terrestrial ecosystems. It is therefore essential to understand what drives their distribution. While multivariate analyses have been used to characterise microbial communities and drivers of their spatial patterns, few studies have focused on predicting the distribution of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). Here, we evaluate the potential of species distribution models (SDMs) to predict the presence–absence and relative abundance distribution of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protist ASVs in the western Swiss Alps. Advanced automated selection of abiotic covariates was used to circumvent the lack of knowledge on the ecology of each ASV. Presence–absence SDMs could be fitted for most ASVs, yielding better predictions than null models. Relative abundance SDMs performed less well, with low fit and predictive power overall, but displayed a good capacity to differentiate between sites with high and low relative abundance of the modelled ASV. SDMs for bacteria and archaea displayed better predictive power than for fungi and protists, suggesting a closer link of the former with the abiotic covariates used. Microorganism distributions were mostly related to edaphic covariates. In particular, pH was the most selected covariate across models. The study shows the potential of using SDM frameworks to predict the distribution of ASVs obtained from topsoil DNA. It also highlights the need for further development of precise edaphic mapping and scenario modelling to enhances prediction of microorganism distributions in the future.
土壤微生物在塑造陆地生态系统方面发挥着关键作用。因此,了解其分布的驱动因素至关重要。虽然多元分析已被用于描述微生物群落的特征及其空间模式的驱动因素,但很少有研究侧重于预测扩增子序列变体(ASV)的分布。在这里,我们评估了物种分布模型(SDMs)预测瑞士阿尔卑斯山西部细菌、古菌、真菌和原生动物 ASV 的存在-不存在和相对丰度分布的潜力。利用先进的非生物协变量自动选择技术,避免了对每种 ASV 生态学知识的缺乏。大多数ASV都可以拟合出存在-不存在SDM,其预测结果优于空模型。相对丰度模式的表现较差,总体拟合度和预测能力较低,但在区分建模 ASV 相对丰度高和相对丰度低的地点方面表现良好。与真菌和原生生物相比,细菌和古细菌的 SDM 预测能力更强,这表明细菌和古细菌与所用的非生物协变量有更密切的联系。微生物的分布主要与环境协变量有关。其中,pH 值是各模型中选择最多的协变量。这项研究表明,使用 SDM 框架预测从表层土壤 DNA 中获得的 ASV 分布具有潜力。该研究还强调了进一步开发精确的土壤环境绘图和情景建模的必要性,以加强对未来微生物分布的预测。
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.