Effects of pre-emergence herbicide on targeted post-emergence herbicide application in plasticulture production

IF 5.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ana C. Buzanini, Arnold Schumann, Nathan S. Boyd
{"title":"Effects of pre-emergence herbicide on targeted post-emergence herbicide application in plasticulture production","authors":"Ana C. Buzanini, Arnold Schumann, Nathan S. Boyd","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10150-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smart spray technology developed at the University of Florida was designed to reduce off-target applications when applying postemergence (POST) herbicides for weed control in plasticulture systems. A trial was conducted in the fall of 2021 and spring of 2022 to evaluate smart spray technology in row middles in a banana pepper field at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Balm, FL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeted POST-herbicide applications in plasticulture pepper row middles in the presence or absence of a pre-emergent (PRE) herbicide. Flumioxazin reduced broadleaf and overall weed densities in both seasons and lowered grass density in the spring. Two targeted applications reduced the nutsedge density in spring compared to the two banded applications. No significant pepper damage was observed in any treatments. Applied POST herbicide volume following PRE-herbicide was reduced by 84% and 54% for fall and spring respectively. In the absence of a PRE herbicide, targeted applications reduced POST-herbicide volumes by 30% and 45% for fall and spring respectively. No reduction in weed control or pepper yield was observed when comparing targeted with banded applications. Overall, the use of smart spray technology for POST herbicides in row middles reduced applied spray volume with no reduction in weed control, significant injuries on pepper, or negative effects on yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10150-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart spray technology developed at the University of Florida was designed to reduce off-target applications when applying postemergence (POST) herbicides for weed control in plasticulture systems. A trial was conducted in the fall of 2021 and spring of 2022 to evaluate smart spray technology in row middles in a banana pepper field at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center in Balm, FL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of targeted POST-herbicide applications in plasticulture pepper row middles in the presence or absence of a pre-emergent (PRE) herbicide. Flumioxazin reduced broadleaf and overall weed densities in both seasons and lowered grass density in the spring. Two targeted applications reduced the nutsedge density in spring compared to the two banded applications. No significant pepper damage was observed in any treatments. Applied POST herbicide volume following PRE-herbicide was reduced by 84% and 54% for fall and spring respectively. In the absence of a PRE herbicide, targeted applications reduced POST-herbicide volumes by 30% and 45% for fall and spring respectively. No reduction in weed control or pepper yield was observed when comparing targeted with banded applications. Overall, the use of smart spray technology for POST herbicides in row middles reduced applied spray volume with no reduction in weed control, significant injuries on pepper, or negative effects on yield.

Abstract Image

芽前除草剂对塑料栽培生产中芽后定向除草剂施用的影响
佛罗里达大学开发的智能喷雾技术旨在减少萌芽后(POST)除草剂在塑料栽培系统中用于控制杂草时的脱靶应用。2021 年秋季和 2022 年春季进行了一项试验,以评估智能喷雾技术在佛罗里达州巴尔姆市墨西哥湾研究与教育中心香蕉胡椒田行间的应用情况。这项研究的目的是评估在施用或未施用萌芽前(PRE)除草剂的情况下,有针对性地在塑料栽培辣椒行中间施用萌芽后除草剂的效果。氟草胺在两个季节都降低了阔叶杂草和整体杂草的密度,并在春季降低了禾本科杂草的密度。与两次带状施药相比,两次定向施药降低了春季果岭草的密度。在任何处理中都没有观察到明显的辣椒损害。在秋季和春季,施用预除草剂后的后除草剂用量分别减少了 84% 和 54%。在没有使用前除草剂的情况下,秋季和春季定向施用后除草剂的用量分别减少了 30% 和 45%。在比较定向喷洒和带状喷洒时,没有发现杂草控制或辣椒产量的减少。总之,在行中间使用智能喷雾技术喷洒后除草剂可减少喷洒量,但不会降低杂草控制效果,也不会对辣椒造成明显伤害或对产量产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Agriculture
Precision Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming. There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc. Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc. Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc. Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc. Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc. Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信