An Uncertainty-Quantification Machine Learning Framework for Data-Driven Three-Dimensional Mineral Prospectivity Mapping

IF 4.8 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhiqiang Zhang, Gongwen Wang, Emmanuel John M. Carranza, Jingguo Du, Yingjie Li, Xinxing Liu, Yongjun Su
{"title":"An Uncertainty-Quantification Machine Learning Framework for Data-Driven Three-Dimensional Mineral Prospectivity Mapping","authors":"Zhiqiang Zhang, Gongwen Wang, Emmanuel John M. Carranza, Jingguo Du, Yingjie Li, Xinxing Liu, Yongjun Su","doi":"10.1007/s11053-024-10349-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The uncertainty inherent in three-dimensional (3D) mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) encompasses (a) mineral system conceptual model uncertainty stemming from geological conceptual frameworks, (b) aleatoric uncertainty, attributable to the variability and noise due to multi-source geoscience datasets collection and processing, as well as 3D geological modeling process, and (c) epistemic uncertainty due to predictive algorithm modeling. Quantifying the uncertainty of 3D MPM is a prerequisite for accepting predictive models in exploration. Previous MPM studies were centered on addressing the mineral system conceptual model uncertainty. To the best of our knowledge, few studies quantified the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties of 3D MPM. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-quantification machine learning framework to qualify aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in 3D MPM by the uncertainty-quantification random forest. Another innovation of this framework is utility of the accuracy–rejection curve to provide a quantitative uncertainty threshold for exploration target delineation. The Bayesian hyperparameter optimization tunes the hyperparameters of the uncertainty-quantification random forest automatically. The case study of 3D MPM for exploration target delineation in the Wulong gold district of China demonstrated the practicality of our framework. The aleatoric uncertainty of the 3D MPM indicates that the 3D Early Cretaceous dyke model is the main source of this uncertainty. The 3D exploration targets delineated by the uncertainty-quantification machine learning framework can benefit subsurface gold exploration in the study area.</p>","PeriodicalId":54284,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Research","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10349-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uncertainty inherent in three-dimensional (3D) mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) encompasses (a) mineral system conceptual model uncertainty stemming from geological conceptual frameworks, (b) aleatoric uncertainty, attributable to the variability and noise due to multi-source geoscience datasets collection and processing, as well as 3D geological modeling process, and (c) epistemic uncertainty due to predictive algorithm modeling. Quantifying the uncertainty of 3D MPM is a prerequisite for accepting predictive models in exploration. Previous MPM studies were centered on addressing the mineral system conceptual model uncertainty. To the best of our knowledge, few studies quantified the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties of 3D MPM. This study proposes a novel uncertainty-quantification machine learning framework to qualify aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in 3D MPM by the uncertainty-quantification random forest. Another innovation of this framework is utility of the accuracy–rejection curve to provide a quantitative uncertainty threshold for exploration target delineation. The Bayesian hyperparameter optimization tunes the hyperparameters of the uncertainty-quantification random forest automatically. The case study of 3D MPM for exploration target delineation in the Wulong gold district of China demonstrated the practicality of our framework. The aleatoric uncertainty of the 3D MPM indicates that the 3D Early Cretaceous dyke model is the main source of this uncertainty. The 3D exploration targets delineated by the uncertainty-quantification machine learning framework can benefit subsurface gold exploration in the study area.

Abstract Image

用于数据驱动的三维矿产远景测绘的不确定性量化机器学习框架
三维(3D)矿产远景测绘(MPM)中固有的不确定性包括:(a)源于地质概念框架的矿产系统概念模型的不确定性;(b)由于多源地球科学数据集的收集和处理以及三维地质建模过程中的变异性和噪声而产生的不确定性;以及(c)由于预测算法建模而产生的认识论上的不确定性。量化三维 MPM 的不确定性是在勘探中接受预测模型的先决条件。以往的多金属结核研究主要集中在解决矿物系统概念模型的不确定性。据我们所知,很少有研究对三维多孔材料测量的不确定性和认识不确定性进行量化。本研究提出了一种新颖的不确定性量化机器学习框架,通过不确定性量化随机森林对三维 MPM 中的已知不确定性和认识不确定性进行量化。该框架的另一项创新是利用准确度-拒绝曲线为勘探目标划分提供定量不确定性阈值。贝叶斯超参数优化可自动调整不确定性量化随机森林的超参数。在中国武隆金矿区进行的用于勘探目标划分的三维 MPM 案例研究证明了我们框架的实用性。三维 MPM 的不确定性表明,三维早白垩世堤坝模型是不确定性的主要来源。通过不确定性量化机器学习框架划定的三维勘探目标可为研究区域的地下金矿勘探带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Resources Research
Natural Resources Research Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: This journal publishes quantitative studies of natural (mainly but not limited to mineral) resources exploration, evaluation and exploitation, including environmental and risk-related aspects. Typical articles use geoscientific data or analyses to assess, test, or compare resource-related aspects. NRR covers a wide variety of resources including minerals, coal, hydrocarbon, geothermal, water, and vegetation. Case studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信