Effects of two common antibiotics on the skin microbiome of ornamental reef fishes: Implications for manipulative experiments in microbial dynamics

IF 1.1 Q3 FISHERIES
Ana Pereira, Anya Brown, Davis Strobel, Marta C. Soares, Raquel Xavier, Amy Apprill, Paul Sikkel
{"title":"Effects of two common antibiotics on the skin microbiome of ornamental reef fishes: Implications for manipulative experiments in microbial dynamics","authors":"Ana Pereira,&nbsp;Anya Brown,&nbsp;Davis Strobel,&nbsp;Marta C. Soares,&nbsp;Raquel Xavier,&nbsp;Amy Apprill,&nbsp;Paul Sikkel","doi":"10.1002/aff2.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An understanding of the mechanistic drivers of animal-microbial symbiosis and associations generally requires experiments that manipulate specific symbionts or microbial communities. As part of an ongoing study of the mechanisms that drive microbial communities in coral reef fishes, and specifically the role of cleanerfish in microbial transmission, we tested the effects of the commonly used antibiotics Enrofloxacin and Nitrofurazone on the skin microbiome of three ornamental reef fish species: the four-eyed butterflyfish, <i>Chaetodon capistratus</i> (Chaetodontidae), the cleanerfish neon goby <i>Elacatinus oceanops</i> (Gobiidae) and the beaugregory damselfish <i>Stegastes leucostictus</i> (Pomacentridae). Our main aim was to characterize dysbiosis prompted by the delivery of the two antibiotics and understand whether both could be used to establish good starting points for microbial transmission experiments. We bathed the fish in antibiotic (or no exposure in the controls), sampled the skin microbiota via swabbing at zero (before treatment) and 3 and 7 days during the treatments, and examined the microbial community using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Nitrofurazone reduced skin-associated microbial diversity in all species, whereas the same effect for Enrofloxacin was only seen in <i>S. leucostictus</i>. Although each antibiotic had its own, unique impact in microbial community, all treatments showed positive and negative shifts in the most abundant microbial taxa over time. Moreover, soon after the delivery of both antibiotics, increases in the abundance of opportunistic bacteria or potential pathogens, such as <i>Alteromonas</i> and <i>Vibrio</i>, were observed. Although both antibiotics are effective, Nitrofurazone more successfully reduces microbial diversity and therefore may be more ideal for experiments seeking to disrupt fish microbiomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An understanding of the mechanistic drivers of animal-microbial symbiosis and associations generally requires experiments that manipulate specific symbionts or microbial communities. As part of an ongoing study of the mechanisms that drive microbial communities in coral reef fishes, and specifically the role of cleanerfish in microbial transmission, we tested the effects of the commonly used antibiotics Enrofloxacin and Nitrofurazone on the skin microbiome of three ornamental reef fish species: the four-eyed butterflyfish, Chaetodon capistratus (Chaetodontidae), the cleanerfish neon goby Elacatinus oceanops (Gobiidae) and the beaugregory damselfish Stegastes leucostictus (Pomacentridae). Our main aim was to characterize dysbiosis prompted by the delivery of the two antibiotics and understand whether both could be used to establish good starting points for microbial transmission experiments. We bathed the fish in antibiotic (or no exposure in the controls), sampled the skin microbiota via swabbing at zero (before treatment) and 3 and 7 days during the treatments, and examined the microbial community using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. Nitrofurazone reduced skin-associated microbial diversity in all species, whereas the same effect for Enrofloxacin was only seen in S. leucostictus. Although each antibiotic had its own, unique impact in microbial community, all treatments showed positive and negative shifts in the most abundant microbial taxa over time. Moreover, soon after the delivery of both antibiotics, increases in the abundance of opportunistic bacteria or potential pathogens, such as Alteromonas and Vibrio, were observed. Although both antibiotics are effective, Nitrofurazone more successfully reduces microbial diversity and therefore may be more ideal for experiments seeking to disrupt fish microbiomes.

Abstract Image

两种常见抗生素对观赏珊瑚鱼皮肤微生物组的影响:微生物动态操纵实验的意义
要了解动物与微生物共生和关联的机理驱动因素,一般需要进行操纵特定共生体或微生物群落的实验。作为正在进行的珊瑚礁鱼类微生物群落驱动机制研究的一部分,特别是清洁鱼在微生物传播中的作用,我们测试了常用抗生素恩诺沙星和硝呋拉松对三种观赏珊瑚礁鱼类皮肤微生物群落的影响:我们测试了常用抗生素恩诺沙星和硝呋拉宗对三种观赏珊瑚鱼皮肤微生物组的影响:四眼蝶鱼(Chaetodon capistratus,Chaetodontidae)、清洁鱼霓虹虾虎鱼(Elacatinus oceanops,Gobiidae)和豆娘(Stegastes leucostictus,Pomacentridae)。我们的主要目的是描述这两种抗生素施用引起的菌群失调,并了解这两种抗生素是否可用于建立微生物传播实验的良好起点。我们用抗生素给鱼洗澡(或在对照组中不接触抗生素),在零点(治疗前)、治疗期间的 3 天和 7 天通过拭子采集皮肤微生物群样本,并使用 16S rRNA 基因测序方法检查微生物群落。结果表明,硝呋酮降低了所有物种的皮肤相关微生物多样性,而恩诺沙星只对白僵菌有同样的效果。虽然每种抗生素对微生物群落都有其独特的影响,但随着时间的推移,所有治疗方法都会使最丰富的微生物类群发生正负变化。此外,在使用两种抗生素后不久,还观察到机会性细菌或潜在病原体(如变形单胞菌和弧菌)的数量有所增加。虽然两种抗生素都有效,但硝呋酮能更成功地减少微生物多样性,因此可能更适合用于破坏鱼类微生物组的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信