A multi-analytical approach reveals flexible compound adhesive technology at Steenbokfontein Cave, Western Cape

IF 2.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Alessandro Aleo , Antonieta Jerardino , Rivka Chasan , Myrto Despotopoulou , Dominique J.M. Ngan-Tillard , Ruud W.A. Hendrikx , Geeske H.J. Langejans
{"title":"A multi-analytical approach reveals flexible compound adhesive technology at Steenbokfontein Cave, Western Cape","authors":"Alessandro Aleo ,&nbsp;Antonieta Jerardino ,&nbsp;Rivka Chasan ,&nbsp;Myrto Despotopoulou ,&nbsp;Dominique J.M. Ngan-Tillard ,&nbsp;Ruud W.A. Hendrikx ,&nbsp;Geeske H.J. Langejans","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2024.105997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evidence of different compound resin-based adhesives is present in South Africa from at least 77000 years ago. Ancient glue production is considered one of the oldest known highly complex technologies, requiring advanced technological and mental abilities. However, our current knowledge of adhesive materials, recipes, and uses in South Africa is limited by the lack of in-depth analysis and molecular characterization of residues. To deepen our knowledge of past adhesive technology, we performed a detailed multi-analytical analysis (use-wear, XRD, μ-CT, IR spectroscopy, GC-MS) of 30 Later Stone Age tools with adhesive remains from Steenbokfontein Cave, South Africa. At the site, tools made of various rocks were hafted with compound adhesives, and we identified three recipes: 1) resin/tar of <em>Widdringtonia</em> or <em>Podocarpus</em> species combined with hematite; 2) resin/tar of <em>Widdringtonia</em> or <em>Podocarpus</em> species mixed with hematite and another plant exudate; 3) resin/tar without hematite. The studied scrapers were used in hide-working activities, and the studied cutting tools were used to work animal and soft plant matters. All scrapers display evidence of intense resharpening and were discarded when no longer useable. The combination of different methods for residue analysis reveals the flexibility of adhesive technology at Steenbokfontein. Despite the consistent use of conifer resin/tar throughout the sequence, we observed that other ingredients were added or excluded independently of the tools’ raw materials and functions. Our results highlight the long-lasting tradition of using adhesive material from conifer species but also the adaptability and flexibility of adhesive traditions. The systematic application of this multi-analytical approach to Pleistocene adhesives will be useful to better characterise adhesive traditions and enhance the debate on the technological, cognitive, and behavioural implications of this technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440324000657/pdfft?md5=b14e26ec8e5a0e3da29d2921d9dfeedc&pid=1-s2.0-S0305440324000657-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440324000657","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence of different compound resin-based adhesives is present in South Africa from at least 77000 years ago. Ancient glue production is considered one of the oldest known highly complex technologies, requiring advanced technological and mental abilities. However, our current knowledge of adhesive materials, recipes, and uses in South Africa is limited by the lack of in-depth analysis and molecular characterization of residues. To deepen our knowledge of past adhesive technology, we performed a detailed multi-analytical analysis (use-wear, XRD, μ-CT, IR spectroscopy, GC-MS) of 30 Later Stone Age tools with adhesive remains from Steenbokfontein Cave, South Africa. At the site, tools made of various rocks were hafted with compound adhesives, and we identified three recipes: 1) resin/tar of Widdringtonia or Podocarpus species combined with hematite; 2) resin/tar of Widdringtonia or Podocarpus species mixed with hematite and another plant exudate; 3) resin/tar without hematite. The studied scrapers were used in hide-working activities, and the studied cutting tools were used to work animal and soft plant matters. All scrapers display evidence of intense resharpening and were discarded when no longer useable. The combination of different methods for residue analysis reveals the flexibility of adhesive technology at Steenbokfontein. Despite the consistent use of conifer resin/tar throughout the sequence, we observed that other ingredients were added or excluded independently of the tools’ raw materials and functions. Our results highlight the long-lasting tradition of using adhesive material from conifer species but also the adaptability and flexibility of adhesive traditions. The systematic application of this multi-analytical approach to Pleistocene adhesives will be useful to better characterise adhesive traditions and enhance the debate on the technological, cognitive, and behavioural implications of this technology.

多分析方法揭示西开普省 Steenbokfontein 洞穴的柔性复合粘合剂技术
南非至少在 7.7 万年前就有不同的复合树脂基粘合剂的证据。古代胶水生产被认为是已知最古老的高度复杂技术之一,需要先进的技术和思维能力。然而,由于缺乏对残留物的深入分析和分子特征描述,我们目前对南非粘合剂材料、配方和用途的了解十分有限。为了加深对过去粘合剂技术的了解,我们对南非 Steenbokfontein 洞穴出土的 30 件带有粘合剂残留物的后石器时代工具进行了详细的多分析(使用磨损、XRD、μ-CT、红外光谱、气相色谱-质谱)。在该遗址中,由各种岩石制成的工具上都有复合粘合剂,我们确定了三种配方:我们确定了三种配方:1)含有赤铁矿的维德林桐或荚果树种的树脂/焦油;2)含有赤铁矿和另一种植物渗出物的维德林桐或荚果树种的树脂/焦油;3)不含赤铁矿的树脂/焦油。所研究的刮削器用于兽皮加工活动,所研究的切割工具用于加工动物和软体植物物质。所有的刮削器都显示出锐化过的痕迹,并且在无法继续使用时被丢弃。不同残留物分析方法的结合显示了 Steenbokfontein 粘合剂技术的灵活性。尽管在整个序列中始终使用针叶树脂/焦油,但我们观察到,其他成分的添加或排除与工具的原材料和功能无关。我们的研究结果凸显了使用针叶树树种粘合材料的悠久传统,同时也体现了粘合剂传统的适应性和灵活性。将这种多重分析方法系统地应用于更新世粘合剂将有助于更好地描述粘合剂传统的特征,并加强对这种技术的技术、认知和行为影响的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信