Dobromil Galvánek, Eva Uhliarová, Karol Ujházy, Mariana Ujházyová, Monika Janišová, Jakub Těšitel
{"title":"Reversing expansion of Calamagrostis epigejos in Carpathian mountain grasslands by mowing and application of hemiparasitic Rhinanthus alectorolophus","authors":"Dobromil Galvánek, Eva Uhliarová, Karol Ujházy, Mariana Ujházyová, Monika Janišová, Jakub Těšitel","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>The expansion of <i>Calamagrostis epigejos</i> poses a significant threat to the biodiversity of mountain grasslands. We asked whether grasslands dominated by <i>C. epigejos</i> can be restored through mowing and the application of hemiparasitic <i>Rhinanthus alectorolophus</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Carpathian <i>Violion caninae</i> alliance mountain grassland close to Vrchslatina, Veporské vrchy Mts, Slovakia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a before–after control–impact experiment in a grassland entirely dominated by <i>C. epigejos</i>: six blocks, each with four treatment combinations: (i) mowing once in summer, (ii) mowing in summer and autumn, (iii) mowing in summer and seed sowing of <i>R. alectorolophus</i>, (iv) mowing in summer and autumn along with seed sowing of <i>R. alectorolophus</i>. We monitored the above-ground biomass of <i>C. epigejos</i>, <i>R. alectorolophus</i>, the combined above-ground biomass of other species, and the vegetation composition annually from 2014 to 2017. Linear mixed-effect models and redundancy analysis (RDA) were employed to analyze the effects of the treatments on <i>C. epigejos</i> and community parameters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sowing established <i>R. alectorolophus</i> at the plots mown twice in the first year, but its density strongly declined in subsequent years. <i>R. alectorolophus</i> and mowing twice significantly reduced <i>C. epigejos</i> biomass and herb layer cover. They also increased community evenness and the ratio between other species and <i>C. epigejos</i> biomass with a more pronounced effect on the plots where <i>R. alectorolophus</i> was applied. Mowing twice led to increased species richness, evenness, the number of target grassland species and their proportion in the community. <i>R. alectorolophus</i> had an additional positive impact on community evenness and the proportion of target species. RDA identified <i>R. alectorolophus</i> as the main driver of the directional community change triggered by the experimental treatments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Mowing twice per season proves to be an efficient restoration management strategy for mountain grasslands dominated by <i>C. epigejos</i>. Sowing <i>R. alectorolophus</i>, however, may be employed as an additional measure to accelerate the decline of <i>C. epigejos</i> at the outset of the restoration process and enhance community structure and composition.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Questions
The expansion of Calamagrostis epigejos poses a significant threat to the biodiversity of mountain grasslands. We asked whether grasslands dominated by C. epigejos can be restored through mowing and the application of hemiparasitic Rhinanthus alectorolophus.
Location
Carpathian Violion caninae alliance mountain grassland close to Vrchslatina, Veporské vrchy Mts, Slovakia.
Methods
We conducted a before–after control–impact experiment in a grassland entirely dominated by C. epigejos: six blocks, each with four treatment combinations: (i) mowing once in summer, (ii) mowing in summer and autumn, (iii) mowing in summer and seed sowing of R. alectorolophus, (iv) mowing in summer and autumn along with seed sowing of R. alectorolophus. We monitored the above-ground biomass of C. epigejos, R. alectorolophus, the combined above-ground biomass of other species, and the vegetation composition annually from 2014 to 2017. Linear mixed-effect models and redundancy analysis (RDA) were employed to analyze the effects of the treatments on C. epigejos and community parameters.
Results
Sowing established R. alectorolophus at the plots mown twice in the first year, but its density strongly declined in subsequent years. R. alectorolophus and mowing twice significantly reduced C. epigejos biomass and herb layer cover. They also increased community evenness and the ratio between other species and C. epigejos biomass with a more pronounced effect on the plots where R. alectorolophus was applied. Mowing twice led to increased species richness, evenness, the number of target grassland species and their proportion in the community. R. alectorolophus had an additional positive impact on community evenness and the proportion of target species. RDA identified R. alectorolophus as the main driver of the directional community change triggered by the experimental treatments.
Conclusion
Mowing twice per season proves to be an efficient restoration management strategy for mountain grasslands dominated by C. epigejos. Sowing R. alectorolophus, however, may be employed as an additional measure to accelerate the decline of C. epigejos at the outset of the restoration process and enhance community structure and composition.
期刊介绍:
Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.