Fear of negative and positive evaluation as mediators and moderators of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Amanda S. Morrison , Philippe R. Goldin , James J. Gross
{"title":"Fear of negative and positive evaluation as mediators and moderators of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder","authors":"Amanda S. Morrison ,&nbsp;Philippe R. Goldin ,&nbsp;James J. Gross","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Elevated fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE) are thought to play key roles in the maintenance of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Although efficacious therapies exist for SAD, the potential mediating and moderating effects of FNE and FPE on social anxiety treatment outcome have not been examined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This sample comprised a secondary analysis of 210 individuals who participated in one of three randomized controlled trials for the treatment of SAD. Participants were randomized to: individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), group CBT, community mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), group MBSR, or they were randomized to waitlist and offered treatment after waitlist. Assessments were completed pre- and post-treatment/waitlist and, for the treatment groups, at three-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CBT and MBSR led to greater reductions in FNE and FPE than waitlist, with CBT more efficacious in reducing FPE than MBSR. For both CBT (vs. waitlist) and MBSR (vs. waitlist), there were significant indirect effects on post-treatment social anxiety through both FNE and FPE, and the indirect effect through FPE was greater for CBT than MBSR. However, in the fully longitudinal model testing mediation, CBT and MBSR were not differentially mediated by FPE. Baseline FNE and FPE each moderated CBT treatment outcome compared to waitlist – higher baseline FNE and FPE were associated with higher baseline social anxiety and greater reductions in social anxiety during CBT.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>FNE and FPE contributed in sometimes similar and sometimes distinct ways to the mediation and moderation of psychosocial approaches for treating SAD. This supports the importance of distinguishing between fears of negative and positive evaluation in the assessment and treatment of SAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000501/pdfft?md5=5580ab63d135da502baf04bcac5e0b5f&pid=1-s2.0-S0887618524000501-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Elevated fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE) are thought to play key roles in the maintenance of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Although efficacious therapies exist for SAD, the potential mediating and moderating effects of FNE and FPE on social anxiety treatment outcome have not been examined.

Methods

This sample comprised a secondary analysis of 210 individuals who participated in one of three randomized controlled trials for the treatment of SAD. Participants were randomized to: individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), group CBT, community mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), group MBSR, or they were randomized to waitlist and offered treatment after waitlist. Assessments were completed pre- and post-treatment/waitlist and, for the treatment groups, at three-month follow-up.

Results

CBT and MBSR led to greater reductions in FNE and FPE than waitlist, with CBT more efficacious in reducing FPE than MBSR. For both CBT (vs. waitlist) and MBSR (vs. waitlist), there were significant indirect effects on post-treatment social anxiety through both FNE and FPE, and the indirect effect through FPE was greater for CBT than MBSR. However, in the fully longitudinal model testing mediation, CBT and MBSR were not differentially mediated by FPE. Baseline FNE and FPE each moderated CBT treatment outcome compared to waitlist – higher baseline FNE and FPE were associated with higher baseline social anxiety and greater reductions in social anxiety during CBT.

Discussion

FNE and FPE contributed in sometimes similar and sometimes distinct ways to the mediation and moderation of psychosocial approaches for treating SAD. This supports the importance of distinguishing between fears of negative and positive evaluation in the assessment and treatment of SAD.

害怕负面和正面评价是社交焦虑症治疗结果的中介和调节因素
简介:人们认为,对负面评价的恐惧(FNE)和对正面评价的恐惧(FPE)的升高在社交焦虑症(SAD)的维持中起着关键作用。尽管目前已有治疗 SAD 的有效疗法,但尚未研究 FNE 和 FPE 对社交焦虑症治疗结果的潜在中介和调节作用。参与者被随机分配到:个人认知行为疗法(CBT)、团体 CBT、社区正念减压疗法(MBSR)、团体 MBSR,或者被随机分配到候选名单,并在候选名单之后接受治疗。结果CBT和MBSR对FNE和FPE的降低幅度大于等待治疗,其中CBT对FPE的降低幅度大于MBSR。对于CBT(与候补表相比)和MBSR(与候补表相比),通过FNE和FPE对治疗后社交焦虑都有显著的间接影响,而且CBT通过FPE产生的间接影响比MBSR更大。然而,在测试中介作用的完全纵向模型中,CBT 和 MBSR 通过 FPE 产生的中介作用并无差异。与等待表相比,基线FNE和FPE各自调节了CBT治疗结果--较高的基线FNE和FPE与较高的基线社交焦虑和CBT期间社交焦虑的较大幅度减少有关。这证明了在评估和治疗 SAD 时区分对负面和正面评价的恐惧的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信