The impact of functional class and depressive symptomatology on rule-based insensitivity

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Conor McCloskey, Alison Stapleton, Louise McHugh
{"title":"The impact of functional class and depressive symptomatology on rule-based insensitivity","authors":"Conor McCloskey,&nbsp;Alison Stapleton,&nbsp;Louise McHugh","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rule-governed behavior (RGB) is important for accounting for complex human behavior, as well as informing clinical practice. In line with Relational Frame Theory, RGB is divided into functional classes including pliance, which is rule-following under the control of apparent arbitrary social consequences, and tracking, which is rule-following under the control of apparent natural non-arbitrary consequences. In theory, pliance should produce lower levels of contingency sensitivity compared to tracking, but how this effect relates to nonclinical populations is unclear. This study (<em>n</em> = 134) tested the relationship between contingency sensitivity in pliance and tracking through a Matching-to-Sample task, while incorporating a measure of depressive symptomatology to test if a distinction in insensitivity would be seen in nondepressed participants. Results indicated that pliance was associated with lower levels of contingency sensitivity relative to tracking overall, and that depressive symptomatology did not influence this. Results are discussed in relation to prior inconsistencies in the experimental literature on RGB, and potential methods for operationalizing pliance in experimental settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100774"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000541/pdfft?md5=f14db06805df7361b66bf4b3ba4ab273&pid=1-s2.0-S2212144724000541-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rule-governed behavior (RGB) is important for accounting for complex human behavior, as well as informing clinical practice. In line with Relational Frame Theory, RGB is divided into functional classes including pliance, which is rule-following under the control of apparent arbitrary social consequences, and tracking, which is rule-following under the control of apparent natural non-arbitrary consequences. In theory, pliance should produce lower levels of contingency sensitivity compared to tracking, but how this effect relates to nonclinical populations is unclear. This study (n = 134) tested the relationship between contingency sensitivity in pliance and tracking through a Matching-to-Sample task, while incorporating a measure of depressive symptomatology to test if a distinction in insensitivity would be seen in nondepressed participants. Results indicated that pliance was associated with lower levels of contingency sensitivity relative to tracking overall, and that depressive symptomatology did not influence this. Results are discussed in relation to prior inconsistencies in the experimental literature on RGB, and potential methods for operationalizing pliance in experimental settings.

功能分级和抑郁症状对基于规则的不敏感性的影响
规则支配行为(RGB)对于解释复杂的人类行为以及指导临床实践非常重要。根据 "关系框架理论"(Relational Frame Theory),规则支配行为被划分为不同的功能类别,包括服从(pliance)和追踪(tracking),前者是在明显的任意社会后果控制下的规则支配行为,后者是在明显的自然非任意后果控制下的规则支配行为。从理论上讲,遵从应该比追踪产生更低水平的或然敏感性,但这种效应与非临床人群的关系尚不清楚。本研究(n = 134)通过一项 "匹配到样本 "任务测试了 "遵从 "和 "追踪 "中或然率敏感性之间的关系,同时纳入了一项抑郁症状测量,以测试在非抑郁参与者中是否会出现或然率不敏感的区别。结果表明,相对于整体追踪,依从与较低水平的或然敏感性相关,而抑郁症状并不影响这一点。本研究结合之前有关 RGB 的实验文献中的不一致之处以及在实验环境中操作依从性的潜在方法对结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信