Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Brayan Díaz , Miguel Nussbaum
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence","authors":"Brayan Díaz ,&nbsp;Miguel Nussbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has been hailed for its potential to revolutionize teaching and learning practices. Undoubtedly, there has been development, but has it transferred to a new pedagogical trend? Indeed, research shows more tools, software, etc., built through AI, but there is still a limited understanding of its pedagogical impact. This review aims to assess whether AI has indeed led to new pedagogical trends in education using a Human Center AI framework. To accomplish this, a systematic review of research on the pedagogical applications of AI in K-12 contexts was conducted, following the PRISMA guidelines. The review involved an inductive coding analysis of a comprehensive search across WoS, Scopus, and EBSBU. From a pool of 3277 publications spanning 2019 to 2023, 183 papers met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis. Six categories emerged: Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, Social Constructivism, Experiential Learning, and Community of Practices. The findings of this research provide a promising perspective on synthesizing the results based on the pedagogical framework that describes AI implementation. While technological advancements have improved AI capabilities, the application of AI in education largely follows the same principles of previous technologies. This research suggests that the failure to transform education through AI stems from a lack of consideration of Gardner's proposed ninth intelligence type—pedagogical intelligence. Furthermore, this paper offers a critical analysis of the HCAI framework and proposes an adaptation called Pedagogical Centered AI (PCAI) for designing and using AI in K-12 education. Final discussions highlight the implications and future perspectives of AI in educational settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 105071"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013152400085X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been hailed for its potential to revolutionize teaching and learning practices. Undoubtedly, there has been development, but has it transferred to a new pedagogical trend? Indeed, research shows more tools, software, etc., built through AI, but there is still a limited understanding of its pedagogical impact. This review aims to assess whether AI has indeed led to new pedagogical trends in education using a Human Center AI framework. To accomplish this, a systematic review of research on the pedagogical applications of AI in K-12 contexts was conducted, following the PRISMA guidelines. The review involved an inductive coding analysis of a comprehensive search across WoS, Scopus, and EBSBU. From a pool of 3277 publications spanning 2019 to 2023, 183 papers met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis. Six categories emerged: Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism, Social Constructivism, Experiential Learning, and Community of Practices. The findings of this research provide a promising perspective on synthesizing the results based on the pedagogical framework that describes AI implementation. While technological advancements have improved AI capabilities, the application of AI in education largely follows the same principles of previous technologies. This research suggests that the failure to transform education through AI stems from a lack of consideration of Gardner's proposed ninth intelligence type—pedagogical intelligence. Furthermore, this paper offers a critical analysis of the HCAI framework and proposes an adaptation called Pedagogical Centered AI (PCAI) for designing and using AI in K-12 education. Final discussions highlight the implications and future perspectives of AI in educational settings.

人工智能在学校教学中的应用:教学智能的必要性
人工智能(AI)被誉为有可能彻底改变教学实践。毋庸置疑,人工智能已经得到了发展,但它是否已经转化为一种新的教学趋势?事实上,研究表明,通过人工智能构建的工具、软件等越来越多,但人们对其教学影响的了解仍然有限。本综述旨在利用 "以人为本 "的人工智能框架,评估人工智能是否确实在教育领域引领了新的教学趋势。为此,我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,对 K-12 阶段人工智能教学应用研究进行了系统性综述。综述包括对 WoS、Scopus 和 EBSBU 的全面搜索进行归纳编码分析。在 2019 年至 2023 年期间的 3277 篇出版物中,有 183 篇论文符合详细分析的纳入标准。共产生了六个类别:行为主义、认知主义、建构主义、社会建构主义、体验式学习和实践社区。这项研究的结果为根据描述人工智能实施情况的教学框架来综合研究成果提供了一个前景广阔的视角。虽然技术进步提高了人工智能的能力,但人工智能在教育中的应用在很大程度上遵循了以往技术的相同原则。这项研究表明,人工智能未能改变教育的原因在于没有考虑到加德纳提出的第九种智能--教学智能。此外,本文还对 HCAI 框架进行了批判性分析,并提出了一种名为 "以教学为中心的人工智能(PCAI)"的调整方案,用于在 K-12 教育中设计和使用人工智能。最后的讨论强调了人工智能在教育环境中的影响和未来前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信