Brigitte Linder , Guo-Yan Yang , Kathleen Lumiere , Lisa Taylor-Swanson , Sandro Graca , Mike Armour
{"title":"Collaborative design of a Chinese herbal medicine case report guideline (CHM-CARE)","authors":"Brigitte Linder , Guo-Yan Yang , Kathleen Lumiere , Lisa Taylor-Swanson , Sandro Graca , Mike Armour","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Case reports have a long history in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), and even into the modern day, case reports are still a preferred format for traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) practitioners. However, the tradition of case reports in teaching and research is not nearly as common in the English-speaking world as in China, possibly due to the lack of a specific case report guideline. This study aimed to co-design a CHM guideline (CHM-CARE) to assist practitioners in compiling structured and comprehensive case reports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-phased mixed approach was used to develop the case report guideline. In phase one, focus groups of TEAM practitioners were used to determine what components of existing guidelines (e.g., Case Report (CARE) and Case Report in Chinese Medicine (CARC)) were relevant to include, along with any additions or changes. Content analysis of phase 1 provided the checklist items for a two-round Delphi process (Phase 2). All checklist items from the first Delphi round with a median of three or higher were included in the second round, with consensus set at >70 % for inclusion in the final guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 18 CHM practitioners from four countries joined five separate focus group discussions. Focus group discussions led to 98 checklist items being used in the first round of the Delphi process. Fifteen international experts on case reports participated in two rounds of Delphi. A total of 69 checklist items moved forward into the second round where 61 items (88 %) reached consensus and formed the final CHM-CARE guideline.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Key elements of a herbal medicine case report checklist were identified, and a 61-item case report guideline (CHM-CARE) was produced, providing clear guidelines for case reports to TEAM practitioners operating in private practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349/pdfft?md5=5127bbf54801801e63ce09c599b36635&pid=1-s2.0-S1876382024000349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Case reports have a long history in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), and even into the modern day, case reports are still a preferred format for traditional East Asian medicine (TEAM) practitioners. However, the tradition of case reports in teaching and research is not nearly as common in the English-speaking world as in China, possibly due to the lack of a specific case report guideline. This study aimed to co-design a CHM guideline (CHM-CARE) to assist practitioners in compiling structured and comprehensive case reports.
Methods
A two-phased mixed approach was used to develop the case report guideline. In phase one, focus groups of TEAM practitioners were used to determine what components of existing guidelines (e.g., Case Report (CARE) and Case Report in Chinese Medicine (CARC)) were relevant to include, along with any additions or changes. Content analysis of phase 1 provided the checklist items for a two-round Delphi process (Phase 2). All checklist items from the first Delphi round with a median of three or higher were included in the second round, with consensus set at >70 % for inclusion in the final guideline.
Results
A total of 18 CHM practitioners from four countries joined five separate focus group discussions. Focus group discussions led to 98 checklist items being used in the first round of the Delphi process. Fifteen international experts on case reports participated in two rounds of Delphi. A total of 69 checklist items moved forward into the second round where 61 items (88 %) reached consensus and formed the final CHM-CARE guideline.
Conclusion
Key elements of a herbal medicine case report checklist were identified, and a 61-item case report guideline (CHM-CARE) was produced, providing clear guidelines for case reports to TEAM practitioners operating in private practice.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education.
EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians.
The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.