A Phase II Study About Efficacy and Safety of the Continuous IntraVenous Infusion of Ketamine as Adjuvant to Opioids in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients With Refractory Cancer Pain (CIVIK Trial).

Kwonoh Park, Jae-Joon Kim, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Oh, Yun Jeong Hong, Seo-Jun Kim, Eun-Ju Park, Nayeon Choi, Seon-Hi Shin, Sungeun Kim, Heejung Ko
{"title":"A Phase II Study About Efficacy and Safety of the Continuous IntraVenous Infusion of Ketamine as Adjuvant to Opioids in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients With Refractory Cancer Pain (CIVIK Trial).","authors":"Kwonoh Park, Jae-Joon Kim, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Oh, Yun Jeong Hong, Seo-Jun Kim, Eun-Ju Park, Nayeon Choi, Seon-Hi Shin, Sungeun Kim, Heejung Ko","doi":"10.1177/10499091241252977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketamine has been used to control refractory cancer pain as an adjuvant to opioids. We conducted a prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of Ketamine in terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled. Refractory cancer pain was indicated by requirements for 4 or more rescue opioids or pain intensity using numerical rating scale > personalized pain goal (PPG) despite of intravenous morphine equivalent daily dose (IV MEDD) ≥ 120 mg/day. The CIVI of ketamine was increased from .05 mg/kg/hour to .5 mg/kg/hour by .05 every 8 hours if pain intensity exceeded PPG or if number of rescue opioids ≥2 during prior 8 hours was required. The primary end-point was overall pain response rate, which indicates complete response (both rescue opioid ≤3/day and pain intensity ≤ PPG) plus partial response (rescue opioid ≤3/day), without unacceptable toxicities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 21 eligible patients enrolled between September 2019 and January 2023, 20 were analyzed. Most pain mechanisms were mixed type (n = 15, 75%), with neuropathic component (n = 17, 85%). The baseline background opioids were IV MEDD 186 mg/24hour (range, 124-592), number of rescue opioids was 6 (IQR, 5-9), and median PPG was 4 (IQR, 3-4). The overall pain response rate was 50% (n = 10) including 40% (n = 8) for complete pain response and 10% (n = 2) for partial pain response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed efficacy of gradually increasing CIVI of ketamine for terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. CIVI of ketamine could be a useful tool in these patients considering the limited treatment options. (NCT03362073, Initial Release: November 15, 2017).</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"244-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241252977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ketamine has been used to control refractory cancer pain as an adjuvant to opioids. We conducted a prospective phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of Ketamine in terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain.

Methods: Hospitalized terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain were enrolled. Refractory cancer pain was indicated by requirements for 4 or more rescue opioids or pain intensity using numerical rating scale > personalized pain goal (PPG) despite of intravenous morphine equivalent daily dose (IV MEDD) ≥ 120 mg/day. The CIVI of ketamine was increased from .05 mg/kg/hour to .5 mg/kg/hour by .05 every 8 hours if pain intensity exceeded PPG or if number of rescue opioids ≥2 during prior 8 hours was required. The primary end-point was overall pain response rate, which indicates complete response (both rescue opioid ≤3/day and pain intensity ≤ PPG) plus partial response (rescue opioid ≤3/day), without unacceptable toxicities.

Results: Among 21 eligible patients enrolled between September 2019 and January 2023, 20 were analyzed. Most pain mechanisms were mixed type (n = 15, 75%), with neuropathic component (n = 17, 85%). The baseline background opioids were IV MEDD 186 mg/24hour (range, 124-592), number of rescue opioids was 6 (IQR, 5-9), and median PPG was 4 (IQR, 3-4). The overall pain response rate was 50% (n = 10) including 40% (n = 8) for complete pain response and 10% (n = 2) for partial pain response.

Conclusion: This study showed efficacy of gradually increasing CIVI of ketamine for terminally ill cancer patients with refractory cancer pain. CIVI of ketamine could be a useful tool in these patients considering the limited treatment options. (NCT03362073, Initial Release: November 15, 2017).

关于静脉内持续输注氯胺酮作为阿片类药物辅助治疗晚期难治性癌痛患者的疗效和安全性的 II 期研究(CIVIK 试验)。
背景:氯胺酮作为阿片类药物的辅助药物已被用于控制难治性癌痛。我们开展了一项前瞻性 II 期研究,调查氯胺酮 5 天连续静脉输注(CIVI)在患有难治性癌痛的晚期癌症患者中的疗效和安全性。难治性癌痛的指征是:尽管静脉注射吗啡等效日剂量(IV MEDD)≥ 120 毫克/天,但仍需使用 4 种或更多阿片类药物或使用数字评分量表进行疼痛强度评分 > 个性化疼痛目标(PPG)。如果疼痛强度超过 PPG,或在前 8 小时内需要使用的阿片类药物≥2 次,氯胺酮的 CIVI 将从 0.05 毫克/千克/小时增加到 0.5 毫克/千克/小时,每 8 小时增加 0.05 毫克。主要终点是总体疼痛反应率,即完全反应(救援阿片类药物≤3/天且疼痛强度≤PPG)加部分反应(救援阿片类药物≤3/天),且无不可接受的毒性反应:在2019年9月至2023年1月期间入组的21名符合条件的患者中,对20名患者进行了分析。大多数疼痛机制为混合型(15 人,75%),其中有神经病理性成分(17 人,85%)。基线背景阿片类药物为静脉注射 MEDD 186 毫克/24 小时(范围为 124-592),救援阿片类药物的数量为 6(IQR,5-9),PPG 中位数为 4(IQR,3-4)。总体疼痛反应率为 50%(n = 10),其中完全疼痛反应率为 40%(n = 8),部分疼痛反应率为 10%(n = 2):本研究表明,逐渐增加氯胺酮 CIVI 对患有难治性癌痛的晚期癌症患者具有疗效。考虑到治疗方案有限,氯胺酮CIVI对这些患者可能是一种有用的工具。(NCT03362073,初次发布:2017年11月15日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信