Program logic of a service collaboration to support parents with intellectual disability

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Elizabeth Jane Doery, Jay Varcoe, Michelle Benstead, Matin Ghayour-Minaie, Rebecca Sheils, Siobhan Kavanagh, Keriann Little, Allie Pert, John W. Toumbourou
{"title":"Program logic of a service collaboration to support parents with intellectual disability","authors":"Elizabeth Jane Doery,&nbsp;Jay Varcoe,&nbsp;Michelle Benstead,&nbsp;Matin Ghayour-Minaie,&nbsp;Rebecca Sheils,&nbsp;Siobhan Kavanagh,&nbsp;Keriann Little,&nbsp;Allie Pert,&nbsp;John W. Toumbourou","doi":"10.1111/jar.13249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This article describes the Steps to Confident Parenting (SCP) program, developed by an Australian family service consortium. The SCP integrates home-based and case-management services to enhance the skills of parents with a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability/cognitive impairment and to prevent child protection interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>‘Program explication’ methodology documented the components/activities, and underpinning evidence for this practitioner designed service through interviews with nine agency staff. A literature review evaluated evidence for the implicit program benefit theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The SCP comprised five logically consistent components—Targeted Referral, Assessments, Initial Consultation, Program Delivery, Closure and Follow-up. Components generally had ‘some’ supportive evidence, however there was a ‘lack of’ evidence for Closure and Follow-up. In the context of a partnership seeking to build the evidence for the SCP, it was recommended that a protocol for a randomised trial evaluation with longer term follow-up be drafted by the consortia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.13249","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.13249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This article describes the Steps to Confident Parenting (SCP) program, developed by an Australian family service consortium. The SCP integrates home-based and case-management services to enhance the skills of parents with a diagnosed or suspected intellectual disability/cognitive impairment and to prevent child protection interventions.

Method

‘Program explication’ methodology documented the components/activities, and underpinning evidence for this practitioner designed service through interviews with nine agency staff. A literature review evaluated evidence for the implicit program benefit theory.

Results and Conclusion

The SCP comprised five logically consistent components—Targeted Referral, Assessments, Initial Consultation, Program Delivery, Closure and Follow-up. Components generally had ‘some’ supportive evidence, however there was a ‘lack of’ evidence for Closure and Follow-up. In the context of a partnership seeking to build the evidence for the SCP, it was recommended that a protocol for a randomised trial evaluation with longer term follow-up be drafted by the consortia.

支持智障父母的服务合作计划逻辑。
背景介绍本文介绍了澳大利亚家庭服务联盟开发的 "自信为人父母的步骤"(SCP)计划。方法:"计划阐释 "方法通过对九名机构工作人员的访谈,记录了这项由从业人员设计的服务的组成部分/活动和基本证据。文献综述评估了隐性计划效益理论的证据:SCP 由五个逻辑上一致的部分组成--目标转介、评估、初步咨询、项目实施、结束和跟踪。各组成部分一般都有 "一些 "支持性证据,但 "结束 "和 "后续行动 "则 "缺乏 "证据。在伙伴关系寻求为 SCP 建立证据的背景下,建议由联合体起草一份进行长期跟踪的随机试验评估规程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信