Factors Considered by Experienced Urologists when Selecting Alpha-Blockers for Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia according to Age.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologia Internationalis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1159/000539313
Hyomyoung Lee, Jung Hoon Lee, Min Soo Choo, Min Chul Cho, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Sangjun Yoo
{"title":"Factors Considered by Experienced Urologists when Selecting Alpha-Blockers for Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia according to Age.","authors":"Hyomyoung Lee, Jung Hoon Lee, Min Soo Choo, Min Chul Cho, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Sangjun Yoo","doi":"10.1159/000539313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objectives of the study were to examine the opinions of urology specialists on whether there are actual differences in efficacy among α1-blockers and to identify the factors that should be considered when prescribing these medications according to age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 50 South Korean urology specialists with over 3 years of clinical experience in secondary or tertiary hospitals in July-August 2021. The survey covered urologists' demographics, awareness of α1-blocker prescription differences, and key factors in α1-blocker selection based on LUTS severity and patient age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 82% of the respondents believed that there were differences in the efficacy of α1-blockers in actual practice according to age. Over 90% of the respondents agreed on the need for head-to-head comparison studies to compare the effects of different α1-blockers. Regardless of the severity of LUTS, urologists prioritize cardiovascular side effects when prescribing α1-blockers to patients aged ≥70 years. Further, 19% of the urologists prioritized ejaculatory side effects for mild-to-moderate LUTS and 9% for severe LUTS (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of different α1-blockers are highly valuable for the real-world clinical application of α1-blockers. Notably, urologists prioritize cardiovascular and ejaculatory side effects in older and younger patients while prescribing α1-blockers, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"434-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objectives of the study were to examine the opinions of urology specialists on whether there are actual differences in efficacy among α1-blockers and to identify the factors that should be considered when prescribing these medications according to age.

Methods: We surveyed 50 South Korean urology specialists with over 3 years of clinical experience in secondary or tertiary hospitals in July-August 2021. The survey covered urologists' demographics, awareness of α1-blocker prescription differences, and key factors in α1-blocker selection based on LUTS severity and patient age.

Results: Overall, 82% of the respondents believed that there were differences in the efficacy of α1-blockers in actual practice according to age. Over 90% of the respondents agreed on the need for head-to-head comparison studies to compare the effects of different α1-blockers. Regardless of the severity of LUTS, urologists prioritize cardiovascular side effects when prescribing α1-blockers to patients aged ≥70 years. Further, 19% of the urologists prioritized ejaculatory side effects for mild-to-moderate LUTS and 9% for severe LUTS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study shows that head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of different α1-blockers are highly valuable for the real-world clinical application of α1-blockers. Notably, urologists prioritize cardiovascular and ejaculatory side effects in older and younger patients while prescribing α1-blockers, respectively.

经验丰富的泌尿科医生在根据年龄为下尿路症状或良性前列腺增生患者选择α-受体阻滞剂时考虑的因素。
引言研究泌尿科专家对α1-受体阻滞剂之间是否存在实际疗效差异的看法,并确定根据年龄开具这些药物处方时应考虑的因素:我们于 2021 年 7 月至 8 月对韩国 50 名在二级或三级医院拥有 3 年以上临床经验的泌尿科专家进行了调查。调查内容包括泌尿科医生的人口统计学特征、对α1-受体阻滞剂处方差异的认识以及根据 LUTS 严重程度和患者年龄选择α1-受体阻滞剂的关键因素:总体而言,82%的受访者认为在实际应用中,α1-受体阻滞剂的疗效因年龄而异。超过 90% 的受访者认为有必要进行头对头比较研究,以比较不同 α1 受体阻滞剂的效果。无论 LUTS 的严重程度如何,泌尿科医生在为年龄≥70 岁的患者开具 α1 受体阻滞剂处方时都会优先考虑心血管副作用。此外,19% 的泌尿科医生会优先考虑轻度至中度 LUTS 患者的射精副作用,9% 的泌尿科医生会优先考虑重度 LUTS 患者的射精副作用(p < 0.001):本研究表明,比较不同α1受体阻滞剂疗效的头对头研究对于α1受体阻滞剂在现实世界中的临床应用非常有价值。值得注意的是,泌尿科医生在开具α1-受体阻滞剂处方时,会分别优先考虑老年患者和年轻患者的心血管副作用和射精副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信