Pioneering a multi-phase framework to harmonize self-reported sleep data across cohorts.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae115
Meredith L Wallace, Susan Redline, Nina Oryshkewych, Sanne J W Hoepel, Annemarie I Luik, Katie L Stone, Rachel P Kolko, Joon Chung, Yue Leng, Rebecca Robbins, Ying Zhang, Lisa L Barnes, Andrew S Lim, Lan Yu, Daniel J Buysse
{"title":"Pioneering a multi-phase framework to harmonize self-reported sleep data across cohorts.","authors":"Meredith L Wallace, Susan Redline, Nina Oryshkewych, Sanne J W Hoepel, Annemarie I Luik, Katie L Stone, Rachel P Kolko, Joon Chung, Yue Leng, Rebecca Robbins, Ying Zhang, Lisa L Barnes, Andrew S Lim, Lan Yu, Daniel J Buysse","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Harmonizing and aggregating data across studies enables pooled analyses that support external validation and enhance replicability and generalizability. However, the multidimensional nature of sleep poses challenges for data harmonization and aggregation. Here we describe and implement our process for harmonizing self-reported sleep data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a multi-phase framework to harmonize self-reported sleep data: (1) compile items, (2) group items into domains, (3) harmonize items, and (4) evaluate harmonizability. We applied this process to produce a pooled multi-cohort sample of five US cohorts plus a separate yet fully harmonized sample from Rotterdam, Netherlands. Sleep and sociodemographic data are described and compared to demonstrate the utility of harmonization and aggregation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 190 unique self-reported sleep items and grouped them into 15 conceptual domains. Using these domains as guiderails, we developed 14 harmonized items measuring aspects of satisfaction, alertness/sleepiness, timing, efficiency, duration, insomnia, and sleep apnea. External raters determined that 13 of these 14 items had moderate-to-high harmonizability. Alertness/Sleepiness items had lower harmonizability, while continuous, quantitative items (e.g. timing, total sleep time, and efficiency) had higher harmonizability. Descriptive statistics identified features that are more consistent (e.g. wake-up time and duration) and more heterogeneous (e.g. time in bed and bedtime) across samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our process can guide researchers and cohort stewards toward effective sleep harmonization and provide a foundation for further methodological development in this expanding field. Broader national and international initiatives promoting common data elements across cohorts are needed to enhance future harmonization and aggregation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Harmonizing and aggregating data across studies enables pooled analyses that support external validation and enhance replicability and generalizability. However, the multidimensional nature of sleep poses challenges for data harmonization and aggregation. Here we describe and implement our process for harmonizing self-reported sleep data.

Methods: We established a multi-phase framework to harmonize self-reported sleep data: (1) compile items, (2) group items into domains, (3) harmonize items, and (4) evaluate harmonizability. We applied this process to produce a pooled multi-cohort sample of five US cohorts plus a separate yet fully harmonized sample from Rotterdam, Netherlands. Sleep and sociodemographic data are described and compared to demonstrate the utility of harmonization and aggregation.

Results: We collected 190 unique self-reported sleep items and grouped them into 15 conceptual domains. Using these domains as guiderails, we developed 14 harmonized items measuring aspects of satisfaction, alertness/sleepiness, timing, efficiency, duration, insomnia, and sleep apnea. External raters determined that 13 of these 14 items had moderate-to-high harmonizability. Alertness/Sleepiness items had lower harmonizability, while continuous, quantitative items (e.g. timing, total sleep time, and efficiency) had higher harmonizability. Descriptive statistics identified features that are more consistent (e.g. wake-up time and duration) and more heterogeneous (e.g. time in bed and bedtime) across samples.

Conclusions: Our process can guide researchers and cohort stewards toward effective sleep harmonization and provide a foundation for further methodological development in this expanding field. Broader national and international initiatives promoting common data elements across cohorts are needed to enhance future harmonization and aggregation efforts.

率先采用多阶段框架,协调不同群体的自我睡眠数据。
研究目标:统一和汇总各项研究的数据有助于进行汇集分析,从而支持外部验证并提高可复制性和可推广性。然而,睡眠的多维性为数据协调和汇总带来了挑战。在此,我们介绍并实施了协调自我报告睡眠数据的流程:我们建立了一个协调自我报告睡眠数据的多阶段框架:(1) 编制项目;(2) 将项目按领域分组;(3) 协调项目;(4) 评估协调性。我们采用这一流程,汇总了五个美国队列的多队列样本,以及一个来自荷兰鹿特丹的单独但完全统一的样本。我们对睡眠和社会人口数据进行了描述和比较,以证明协调和汇总的效用:结果:我们收集了 190 个独特的自我报告睡眠项目,并将其归纳为 15 个概念领域。以这些领域为指导,我们开发了 14 个统一项目,分别测量满意度、警觉性/睡意、时间、效率、持续时间、失眠和睡眠呼吸暂停。外部评定人员认为,这 14 个项目中有 13 个具有中度到高度的协调性。警觉/嗜睡项目的协调性较低,而连续性、定量项目(如定时、总睡眠时间、效率)的协调性较高。描述性统计确定了不同样本中一致性更强(如起床时间、持续时间)和异质性更强(如上床时间、就寝时间)的特征:我们的研究过程可以指导研究人员和队列管理员有效地协调睡眠,并为这一不断扩大的领域提供进一步的方法论发展基础。需要更广泛的国家和国际倡议来促进队列间的通用数据元素,以加强未来的协调和汇总工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信